Journal of Intellectual Property Rights

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Second Decade of Twenty-First Century (2015–2019) - V


Affiliations
1 Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, India
2 Council for Scientific & Industrial Research–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi - 110 012, India
 

This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in the second half of the second decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 20 (1) (2015) to Volume 24 (6) (2019). This is the fifth paper on the theme 'JIPR in IPR Research‘ and proceeds with the same method and arguments as adopted and developed in the previous four papers published on the theme. In this decade, a total of 144 articles were published including one Special Issue on the theme 'New Technologies, Climate Change and IPR‘. These 144 articles were published in 30 issues of 5 volumes. JIPR in this decade published 6 regular issues in Volumes 20 (2015) and 22 (2017). Whereas, the Issues 4 and 5 of Volume 21 (2016); Issues 2 and 3, and 4 and 5 of Volume 23 (2018); and Issues (1) and (2), (3) and (4), and (5) and (6) of Volume 24 (2019) were published jointly. Out of total articles published in JIPR till Volume 24, the number of articles published in this decade (144) constitutes 17.60 (point six zero) percent, and the contribution of this decade (2015–2019) is 19.27 (point two seven) percent.

Keywords

JIPR, IP Statutes, Scholars, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design, Integrated Circuit, Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, IPRs, Treaties, A
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through the articles published in the last decade of twentieth-century (1996–1999) — I, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28 (1)(2023) 68–78.

  • Malik K & Raza A, Contribution of Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through thearticles published in the first decade of twenty-first century(2000–2004) — II, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights,28 (2) (2023) 171–186.

  • Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through thearticles published in the first decade of twenty-first century(2005–2009) — III, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights,28 (3) (2023) 242–266.

  • Raza A & Malik K, Contribution of Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights (JIPR) in IPR research: A view through thearticles published in the second decade of twenty-firstcentury (2010–2014) — IV, Journal of Intellectual PropertyRights, 28 (4) (2023) 347–376.

  • Hanchinal R R, Providing intellectual property protection tofarmers‘ varieties in India under the Protection of PlantVarieties & Farmers‘ Rights Act, 2001, Journal ofIntellectual Property Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 7–18.

  • Sastry K R, Shrivastava A &Venkateshwarlu G, Assessmentof current trends in R&D of chitin-based technologies inagricultural production-consumption systems using PatentAnalytics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (1)(2015) 19–38.

  • Panja S, Majumdar P, Sarkar B K, Mukim K K&Hati A,global research on medical cotton – evidence from PatentLandscape Study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20(1)(2015) 39–50.

  • Pathak H, The jurisdictional dilemma surrounding theIntellectual Property Appellate Board, Journal of IntellectualProperty Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 51–59.

  • Cook T, The restricted act of making available andcommunication to the public in the European Union, Journalof Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 60–66. 10 Wilson N, Guidelines for access and benefit sharing for utilization of biological resources based on Nagoya Protocol effective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (1) (2015) 60–66.

  • The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (Act 18 of 2003).

  • Srivastava M, Chaudhary V &Pilania D S, intellectual property rights on plant varieties in India: A sector-wise analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 81–88.

  • The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers‘ Rights Act, 2001 (Act 53 of 2001).

  • Yamanbhai I & Smith R D, To what extent are pharmaceutical prices determined by patents? A case study of oncology medicines in Thailand, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 89–95.

  • Xu-kun W, Qu Z, Kun D & Shanshan Z, Studies of Chinese intellectual property: Academic basis and development idea, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 96–103.

  • Shrivastava S, Verma H N &Saha R, Strategies for technical assessment via Patent Analysis − A case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 104–111.

  • Kuanpoth J, Intellectual property and transparency in trade negotiations: The experience of Thailand, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 112–121.

  • Cook T, The restricted acts of reproduction and distribution in EU Copyright Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 122–126.

  • Wilson N, Speedy patent application examination at the Indian Patent Office: Impact of Nitto Denko Corporation Case, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (2) (2015) 127–130.

  • Sapatnekar A M, Doctrine of Willful Patent Infringement: Evolution under American Patent Law and need of further research, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 139–146.

  • Joshi O, Roy A &Janodia M, PTE provisions relating to pharmaceutical products in Australia in comparison with European SPC and USA PTE, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 147–154.

  • Xin L & Xiang Y, Potential challenges of 3D printing technology on patent enforcement and considerations for countermeasures in China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 155–163.

  • Rahman Md R, Protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions in Bangladesh, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 164–171.

  • Hsu Shun-liang, Fair and equitable exceptions for farming practice in plant IPR protection in Taiwan, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 172–184.

  • Cook T, Update on the Unitary Patent Court and the European Patent with Unitary Effect, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 185–188.

  • Nair M D, Indo-US IPR Conundrum, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (3) (2015) 189–191.

  • Singh A, Suman T &Thripura V, interfaces and synergies between intellectual property rights and Consumer Protection Law in India: An analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 201–209.

  • Chingale R R&Srikrishna D, Software Patent in India: A comparative judicial and empirical overview, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 210–222.

  • Fatokun O, Hassali M A A& Ibrahim M I M, Characterizing pharmaceuticals on data exclusivity in Malaysia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 223–229.

  • Saidin O K, Transplantation of Foreign Law into Indonesian Copyright Law: The victory of Capitalism Ideology on Pancasila Ideology, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 230–249.

  • Pawar M, Patent portfolio analysis of hair/scalp cosmeceuticals, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4)(2015) 250–263.

  • Cook T, Enforcement Directive and harmonisation of remedies for intellectual property infringement in the EU, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (4) (2015) 264–269.

  • Kaur A & Chaturvedi R, Compulsory licensing of drugs and pharmaceuticals: Issues and dilemma, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 297–287.

  • Kumar V & Sinha K, Status and challenges of intellectual property rights in agriculture innovation in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 288–296.

  • Lenin B K & Rohatgi H, Exceptions and limitation of Patent Rights and its enforcement in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 297–304.

  • Malwadkar P S & Pandey M, Study of Patents filed in India in mechanical engineering sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 305–319.

  • Lertdhamtewe P, Reinventing Thailand‘s plant protection regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 320–329.

  • Zhang H & Yang X, Appropriate patent protection for industries at different levels of technology: Evidence from China, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (5) (2015) 330–338.

  • Kumar A & Mishra A, Gene patenting vis-a-vis notion of patentability, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 349–362.

  • Mysore S, Technology commercialization through licensing: Experiences and lessons-A case study from Indian horticulture sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 363–374.

  • Manjunatha B L, Rao D U M, Dastagiri M B, Sharma J P & Burman R R, Need for Government intervention in regulating seed sale price and trait fee: A case of Bt cotton, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 375–387.

  • Chakraverty P, Effective applicability of Sections 65A and 65B of Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 using case study of digital watermarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 388–397.

  • The Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012 (Act 27 of 2012). Vide Notification No. 29 dated 8 June 2012, Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 1.

  • The Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957).

  • Burhan M & Jain S K, Management of intellectual property and technology transfer by public funded research organizations in India: A case of CSIR, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 398–410.

  • Wilson N, New Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules 2015 - Impact of Court Orders at the Indian Patent Office, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 20 (6) (2015) 411–412.

  • Kochhar S, Indian perspective for sustainable development agenda and functional IPR and ABS domains in agriculture, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 7–15.

  • Arora S & Chaturvedi R, Section 3(d): Implications and key concerns for pharmaceutical sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 16–26.

  • Han J & Lee H J, Study on patent trust system in Korea, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 27–37.

  • Jain B, Impact of granting data exclusivity in agro-chemical sector, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 38–41.

  • Singh V, Chakraborty K & Vincent L, Patent database: Their importance in prior art documentation and patent search, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 42–56.

  • Cook T, New European Union trade mark regime and the institutionalization within it of the co-existence of National and European Union Trade Mark Rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (1) (2016) 57–61.

  • Manjunatha B L, Rao D U M, Dastagiri M B, Sharma J P & Burman R R, New Indian Seeds Bill: Stakeholders‘ policy advocacies to enact, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 73–88.

  • Bill LII of 2004.

  • Viswanath R, Demystifying the Indian FRAND Regime: The interplay of competition and intellectual property, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 89–95.

  • Bortey H M &Mpanju F, Adoption of Plant Breeders‘ Rights System: Perceived implication for food, seed security and sovereignty in Ghana, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 96–104.

  • Sharma A, Investor-State dispute settlement mechanism and intellectual property matters, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 105–109.

  • Manap N A, Shapjee R B, Tehrani P M & Shariff A A bin Mohd, Protecting R&D inventions through intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2)(2016) 110–116.

  • Wilson N, Computer Related Inventions (CRIs) revisited by Indian Patent Office – finalizing the CRI guidelines – Third attempt, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (2) (2016) 117–119.

  • Kumar A, Protecting smell marks: Breaking conventionality, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 129–139.

  • Dountio J O, The Indian protection and utilisation of public funded Intellectual Property Bill, 2008: Does it secure access to medicines?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 140–148.

  • Mehrotra B &Saberwal G, Patents protecting biologics or small molecule drugs are litigated, not others awarded to drug discovery companies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 149–156.

  • Shaikh Shabib-Ahmad &Londhe B R, Intricacies of software protection: A Techno-Legal Review, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 157–165.

  • Bakhtiarvand M, Legal nature and protection of domain names with emphasis on Iranian Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 166–174.

  • Garg K C & Srivastava J, Knowledge structure of IPR as reflected by the content analysis of papers published in Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3) (2016) 175–179.

  • Cook T, The differing protective scope of registered trade marks in Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (3)(2016) 180–183.

  • Dhankar D, Commercialisation and biopiracy of genetic resources in the 21st Century: The imminent need for stronger regulation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 193–210.

  • Mehrotra D, Sabitha S, Nagpal R & Mattas N, Landscape analysis of patent dataset, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 211–225.

  • Amaral C E &Forcellini F A, Patent development and filing in Brazil: Application of value stream mapping to optimize the patent generating process of a company, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 226–237.

  • Gogoi J, ‗Judima‘ the traditional rice wine of Dimasacommunity of Assam: A potential candidate for GI registration, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 238–242.

  • Jui Chia-Wei, Trappey A J C & Fu Chien-Chung, Method of claim-based technology analysis for strategic innovation management – Using TPP-related patents as case examples, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 243–259.

  • Bhagwat M, Kaushik G &Shivpuje V, Second medical use patenting: A review of practices across different jurisdictions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (4) (2016) 260–264.

  • Lukose P, Copyright issues in legal research and writing, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 275–282.

  • Meena R S, Possession and transfer of copyrights of a cinematograph film, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 283–287.

  • Devi S & Padmavati M, Biodiversity monitoring: A pre-condition to access and benefit sharing under the Indian Biological Diversity Act, 2002, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 288–294.

  • Kansal V, Reporters‘ copyright in verbatim transcription and audio record of an extempore speech: Why the UK Act is more lenient than India‘s?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 295–303.

  • Alkhasawneh A A, The legal system for the protection of geographical indications: A study in Jordanian and Comparative Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 304–326.

  • Ghosh E, What should it take to be well-known? Fashioning an evidence-for-benefits matrix for ‗well-known marks‘ under Indian Trademark Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 327–336.

  • Deshpande N A & Nagendra A, Climate mitigation technologies–Perspective based on patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 337–346.

  • Vats N K, Geographical indication–The factors of rural development and strengthening economy, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 347–354.

  • Cook T, ―BREXIT‖ and intellectual property protection in the UK and the EU, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 21 (5–6) (2016) 356–361.

  • Agarwal P, Impact of TPP on international, regional and other plurilateral IP norm setting, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 7–15.

  • Joshi O U, Roy A &Janodia M, Comparative quantitative analysis of Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) in Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 16–22.

  • Raju K D, Compulsory v Voluntary Licensing: A legitimate way to enhance access to essential medicines in developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 23–31.

  • Jaipura L, Singh B & Nayak R, An introduction to intellectual property rights and their importance in Indian Context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 32–41.

  • Sundaram S & Dubey S K, A Sequel to a Relatively Unusual and Complex Patent Situation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (1) (2017) 42–45.

  • Kumari V V, Sastry R K, Chandran M A S & Srivastava T K, Managing intellectual property in collaborative way to meet the agricultural challenges in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 55–64.

  • Ryu C H & Suh M, Strategies used by patentees to delay patent disclosure in literature searches and measures for counteracting them, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 65–75.

  • Raina A, The T(i)PP(ing) point for pharma: Why having TRIPS+ patenting standards in the TPP is bad news for developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 76–82.

  • Issar N and Goel A, A critique of the Indian Patent Assignments Regime: Pre-invention assignments and employee‘s inventions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 83–89.

  • Act 39 of 1970.

  • 2015 (2) Bom CR 100.

  • 131 S. Ct. 2188 (2011).

  • Rahman M, The protection of agricultural products under geographical indication: An alternative tool for agricultural development in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (2) (2017) 90–103.

  • Lenin B K & Babu A, Comparative advertising and the consumer - Changing dynamics, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 113–120.

  • Tyagi A & Chopra S, Standard Essential Patents (SEP‘s) – Issues & challenges in developing economies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 121–135.

  • Banerji A & Suri F K, Patents, R&D expenditure, regulatory filings and exports in Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 136–145.

  • Massadeh F & Al-Nusair F, Consumer protection in the UAE: The Trademarks Act in light of TRIPS provisions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3) (2017) 146–153.

  • Bhardwaj S, Padmanabham G, Jain K, Rao D S & Joshi S V, Technology commercialization in advanced materials sector: Indian context, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (3)(2017) 154–167.

  • Sapatnekar A M &Nemane V V, Legal dynamics of intellectual property relating to nuclear innovations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 177–187.

  • Joshi O, Roy A & Janodia M, Unitary Patent Protection, Unified Patent Court, Supplementary Protection Certificate and Brexit, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 188–199.

  • Raizada G & Dhillon S D, Impact of intellectual property rights on international trade: Evidence from India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 200–210.

  • Krishna V, Jain S K &Chugh A, Commercialization and renewal aspects of patent management in Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 211–223.

  • Nagpal M, Copyright protection through Digital Rights Management in India: A non-essential imposition, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (4) (2017) 224–237.

  • Kumar A, IP protection to software: Conflict between Indian provision and practice, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 247–256.

  • Arora S & Chaturvedi R, Impact of TRIPS on Providing Easy Access to Affordable Medicines in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 257–265.

  • Muralidharan V N, Educational institutions and Copyright Laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 266–269.

  • The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford and Orsv Rameshwari Photocopy Services and Anr, (2016) 73 taxmann.com 214 (Delhi). Judgment dated 16 September 2016. The citation of the judgment has been taken from the article: Muralidharan V N, Educational institutions and Copyright Laws, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 266–269, 269 (Reference No. 2).

  • Article has referred: RBI v Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., (1987) 1 SCC 424; International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) v Aditya Pandey, Civil Appeal Nos. 9412–9413 of 2016; and Entertainment Networks (India) Ltd v Super Cassette Industries Ltd., (2008) 13 SCC 30. The citations of these judgments have been taken from the article.

  • Asok A, Compulsory licensing of patented drugs under national emergency, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 270–275.

  • Triyanto, Copyright Law Enforcement: An Indonesia case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (5) (2017) 276–284.

  • Mittal S, Effects of TRIPS plus provisions in international trade agreements upon Access to medicines in developing countries, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 295–302.

  • Saraswat J & Chaturvedi R, Copyright protection in the digital environment: Indian perspective and international obligations, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 303–310.

  • Gandhi V H, International legal obligation of the state with reference to intellectual property rights (Patents) vis-à- vis right to health: The Indian case study, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 311–319.

  • Massadeh F & Alkrisheh M, The fair trial procedure for intellectual property in light of TRIPS provisions: An analytical study of Jordan and the UK, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 320–328.

  • Sahu S &Panja S, Current status and challenges of medical device innovations- Indian perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22 (6) (2017) 329–335.

  • Bouwer K, Insights for Climate technology transfer from international Environmental and Human Rights Law, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 7–21.

  • Rosencranz A, Modi P, Parab S & Vora A, Climate change and the patent regime: Are patents the answer?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 22–26.

  • Sankar U, Bandopadhyaya T K & Mehta C, Climate change and technology transfer: Tying the knot through human rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 27–34.

  • Padmavati M, Ensuring longevity of traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity to address climate change, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 35–43.

  • Bandopadhyay K, Patenting in renewable energy sector- An analysis, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 44–50.

  • Basu A, Grasping climate technology transfer: A brief discussion on Indian practice, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (1) (2018) 51–59.

  • Klien J A, Rao P M & Dalvi M, Competition and consumer privacy in the cyberspace market, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 70–85.

  • Lisitsa V N, Intellectual property and intellectual rights: Issues of correlation, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 86–93.

  • Khanna N, The securitization of IP assets: Issues and opportunities, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3)(2018) 94–100.

  • Verma S & Mishra N, Recognition and marketing opportunities of a ―GI‖ tag in handloom product: A study of Banaras Brocades and Sarees, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 101–110.

  • Vaidya M, Garg S, Singh C & Mahajan M M, Changing dimensions of drug patents of Indian pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 111–118.

  • Sharma G & Kumar H, Exploring the possibilities of Utility Models patent regime for grassroots innovations in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 119–130.

  • Samuel M P, Sastry R K & Pavani S, A strategic framework for technology valuation in agriculture and allied sectors in India – Case study of chitosan, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (2–3) (2018) 131–140.

  • Egwu C H N &Egwu C, Genetically modified crops controversy: The actualization of intellectual property rights regime, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 151–158.

  • Kishore K, Geographical indications in horticulture: An Indian perspective, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 159–166.

  • Act 48 of 1999.

  • Roy A, Kardile M &Janodia M, Comparative analysis of Canadian ‗Certificate of Supplementary Protection‘ with USA and Australian ‗Patent Term Extension‘ and European ‗Supplementary Protection Certificate‘, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 167–173.

  • Palar M R A, Sukarsa D E & Ramli A M, Indonesian system of geographical indications to protect genetic resources, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 174–193.

  • Vats N K, Electronic library of spiritual heritage: Copyright limitations and exceptions, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 194–197.

  • Campi M, The co-evolution of science and law in plant breeding: Incentives to innovate and access to biological resources, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 198–210.

  • Male G, Enabling environment for research and development growth in Africa: IP protection, challenges, drivers and approaches, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (4–5) (2018) 211–221.

  • Joshi O, Roy A &Janodia M, Analysis of SPC regulation associated with pharmaceutical products in Europe, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 233–242.

  • Shaikh S A, Khode A & Deshpande N, Prior art searches in software patents – Issues faced, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 243–249.

  • Verma S, Kumar R & Yadav S K, An empirical study on consumers‘ buying intentions of counterfeit products in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 250–260.

  • Begum I & Sharma H K, Piracy: A threat to academicians and publishers, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6)(2018) 261–269.

  • Aher S B, Lakaria B L & Yadav B S, Limitations of existing IPR legislations in managing emerging environmental issues, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 270–272.

  • Srivastava S & Chetan, Continental impact and assorted empirical study of intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 23 (6) (2018) 273–276.

  • Joshi O, Roy A &Janodia M, SPC regulation, analysis of SPC case laws and roadmap for pharmaceutical industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 5–20.

  • Sarkar A, Reddy N & Sethi N, The menace of patent trolls: What the world can learn from India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 21–27.

  • Bagal Y, Contributory copyright infringement in music industry: Technological implications, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 28–34.

  • The Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 1998 (112 Stat. 2860, Public Law 105–304).

  • The Information and Technology Act, 2000 (Act 21 of 2000).

  • Agarwal V, IPR registration in fashion industry of India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 35–40.

  • Singh B P & Tripathi A K, Blockchain technology and intellectual property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (1–2) (2019) 41–44.

  • Chakrabarti G, Biological Diversity Act: A concern for conservation of genetic resource and associated traditional knowledge in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 53–61.

  • Adekola T A, Abolition of graphical representation in EU Trademark Directive: Should countries with similar provisions follow EU‘s footsteps?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 62–68.

  • Singh A & Gupta P D, Pharmaceutical test data protection and demands for data-exclusivity: Issues and concerns of developing countries and India‘s position, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 69–88.

  • Kariuki F, Notion of ‗Ownership‘ in IP: Protection of traditional ecological knowledge vis-a-vis protection of TK and Cultural Expressions Act, 2016 of Kenya, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 89–102.

  • Tafreshi Say-yed H, Anti Pharmaceutical Patent Ever-greening Law: Global need in support of public health, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 103–112.

  • Suluk C &Artemel M N, The Turkish Supreme Court of Appeals on non-use of trademarks, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (3–4) (2019) 113–114.

  • Asok A, Compulsory licensing for public health and USA‘s Special 301 pressure: An Indian experience, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 125–131.

  • Krishna A, Is Traditional Knowledge Digital Library a success?, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 132–139.

  • Rajeswari R K, Durga Sri C H & Gupta R M V, Regulatory challenges in clinical trials: Strategies to overcome commonly observed deficiencies, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 140–148.

  • Singh D & Singh R K, Licensing of Standard Essential Patents on FRAND Terms in India, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 149–159.

  • Paserangi H, Sakharinalin K, Heryani W, Famauri A T &Ratnawato K, PulutMandoti: Potential GI of Enrekang Regency in Indonesia, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 24 (5–6) (2019) 160–166.


Abstract Views: 64

PDF Views: 46




  • Contribution of Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in IPR Research: A View through the Articles Published in the Second Decade of Twenty-First Century (2015–2019) - V

Abstract Views: 64  |  PDF Views: 46

Authors

Aqa Raza
Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat — 131 001, Haryana, India
Kanika Malik
Council for Scientific & Industrial Research–National Institute of Science, Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi - 110 012, India

Abstract


This Paper seeks to review the articles published in the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (JIPR) in the second half of the second decade of the twenty-first century from Volume 20 (1) (2015) to Volume 24 (6) (2019). This is the fifth paper on the theme 'JIPR in IPR Research‘ and proceeds with the same method and arguments as adopted and developed in the previous four papers published on the theme. In this decade, a total of 144 articles were published including one Special Issue on the theme 'New Technologies, Climate Change and IPR‘. These 144 articles were published in 30 issues of 5 volumes. JIPR in this decade published 6 regular issues in Volumes 20 (2015) and 22 (2017). Whereas, the Issues 4 and 5 of Volume 21 (2016); Issues 2 and 3, and 4 and 5 of Volume 23 (2018); and Issues (1) and (2), (3) and (4), and (5) and (6) of Volume 24 (2019) were published jointly. Out of total articles published in JIPR till Volume 24, the number of articles published in this decade (144) constitutes 17.60 (point six zero) percent, and the contribution of this decade (2015–2019) is 19.27 (point two seven) percent.

Keywords


JIPR, IP Statutes, Scholars, CSIR-NIScPR, CSIR-NISCAIR, IP Awareness, Articles, Copyright, Patents, Trade marks, Geographical Indications, Trade Secrets, Industrial Design, Design, Integrated Circuit, Plant Varieties, TRIPS, WIPO, IPRs, Treaties, A

References