Journal of Intellectual Property Rights

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Economic Justification of Traditional knowledge with Insights from Identity Economics


Affiliations
1 Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur, West Bengal - 721 302, India
 

Within the conventional economic framework, the defence of traditional knowledge as a form of Intellectual Property often lacks a robust foundation. While human rights theories offer a more compelling justification, the economic rationale for protecting traditional knowledge remains elusive at the international stage. This ambiguity has even prompted some academics to challenge the relevance and practicality of safeguarding traditional knowledge through the framework of intellectual property rights. This paper seeks to present an economic argument in favour of traditional knowledge protection, drawing from the principles of ‘Identity Economics’. Interestingly, identity economics provides a rationale for both the widely accepted positive protection and the more debated negative protection of traditional knowledge. Furthermore, the paper delves into justifying additional policy measures to enhance the protection of traditional knowledge.

Keywords

Traditional Knowledge, Economic Rationale, Economic Justification, Identity Economics, Property as Identity
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Akerlof G & Kranton R, Economics and identity, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3) (2000) 715-753.

  • Locke J, Two treatises of Government, (Peacock Books, India) Peacock Books Edition 2017. Originally published 1698.

  • Becker L, the moral basis of property rights, In Nomos XXII: Property, Pennock J and Chapman J ed, (New York University Press, New York) (1980) 187-220.

  • Lemley M A, Property, intellectual property and free riding, Texas Law Review, 83 (2005) 1031-1032.

  • Smith H E, IP as property: Delineating Entitlements in Information, Yale Law Journal, 116 (2007) 1742, 1745.

  • Becker L, Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations, (Routledge, New York) Routledge Revivals, 2014, 48-56, Originally published 1977.

  • Becker L, Deserving to own intellectual property, Chicago- Kent Law Review, 68 (2) (1993) 609-629.

  • Aristotle, Politics Book II, in The Complete Works of Aristotle (Princeton University Press, Princeton) Jonathan Barnes ed., 1984, Chapter 5, at 1262b 38 - 1264b 25.

  • Hegel G W F, Philosophy of Right, (Dover Publications) S W Dyde trans., 2005, paragraphs 41 – 71.

  • WIPO Composite study on the protection of traditional knowledge, 5th session, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/8 (28 April 2003).

  • Ilie L, Intellectual Property Rights: An economic approach, Procedia Economics and Finance, 16 (2014) 548-552.

  • Kitch E W, The nature and function of the patent system, Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2) (1977) 265-290.

  • Merges R & Duffy P, Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials, (LexisNexis) Fourth edition, 2007, 253-256.

  • Drahos P, Global law reform and rent seeking: The Case of Intellectual Property, in Copyright Law Volume III: Copyright in the 21st Century, Atkinson B & Fitzgerald B ed., (Routledge, London) eBook version, 2017, First published 2011.

  • WIPO Composite study on the protection of traditional knowledge, 5th session, WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/8 (28 April 2003) at 15.

  • Carvalho N, Sisyphus redivivus? The work of WIPO on genetic resources and traditional knowledge, in Routledge Handbook of Biodiversity and the Law, McManis C & Ong B ed., (Routledge, Abingdon) eBook version, 2017.

  • Landes W & Posner R A, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law, (Harvard University Press) Illustrated Kindle edition, 2009.

  • Raustiala K & Munzer S, The global struggle over geographic indications, European Journal of International Law, 18 (2) (2007) 361-63, 365.

  • Simon H A, Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioural science, American Economic Review, 49 (3) (1959) 253-283.

  • Simon H A, Rationality in psychology and economics, Journal of Business, 59 (4) Part 2 (1986) S209-S224.

  • Tversky A & Kahnemann D, Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185 (4157) (1974) 1124-1131.

  • Khattab H, Women’s Perceptions of Sexuality in Rural Giza, (Reproductive Health Working Group, The Population Council) Monographs in Reproductive Health No 1, 1996.

  • Nisbett R & Cohen D, Culture of Honor: The psychology of violence in the south, (Routledge, New York) Kindle edition, 2018, First published in 1996 by Westview Press.


Abstract Views: 139

PDF Views: 65




  • Economic Justification of Traditional knowledge with Insights from Identity Economics

Abstract Views: 139  |  PDF Views: 65

Authors

Anshuman Sahoo
Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur, West Bengal - 721 302, India

Abstract


Within the conventional economic framework, the defence of traditional knowledge as a form of Intellectual Property often lacks a robust foundation. While human rights theories offer a more compelling justification, the economic rationale for protecting traditional knowledge remains elusive at the international stage. This ambiguity has even prompted some academics to challenge the relevance and practicality of safeguarding traditional knowledge through the framework of intellectual property rights. This paper seeks to present an economic argument in favour of traditional knowledge protection, drawing from the principles of ‘Identity Economics’. Interestingly, identity economics provides a rationale for both the widely accepted positive protection and the more debated negative protection of traditional knowledge. Furthermore, the paper delves into justifying additional policy measures to enhance the protection of traditional knowledge.

Keywords


Traditional Knowledge, Economic Rationale, Economic Justification, Identity Economics, Property as Identity

References