Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kalpana Sastry, R.
- Managing Intellectual Property in Collaborative Way to Meet the Agricultural Challenges in India
Abstract Views :163 |
PDF Views:110
Authors
Affiliations
1 Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, IN
2 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad-500030, IN
3 Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226002, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad-500059, IN
2 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad-500030, IN
3 Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226002, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 22, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 55-64Abstract
Research and development in all the fields of technology, including agriculture are taking place at an impressive pace today. In parallel, the number of intellectual property rights being applied proliferate in order to compensate innovators for these efforts and investments and to foster further innovation. Innovations are also being rewarded by temporarily restricting competition in the production of the resulting goods and services. Patent thicket or “patent floods” is surely making its impact in country like India by hindering the development and commercialization of technology. This can grow into a larger problem in near future with many more challenges to come. The concept of patent pools and clearing houses can be a likely solution to deal with this impediment. This paper has attempted to explain the concept of patent pool and clearing house and also a basic suggestive model for Indian National agricultural research system to facilitate the access to best technology options available with less risk of stalking licenses and much less R&D cost.Keywords
PIPRA, NARS, Patent Pools, Patent Thicket, Clearing House, Open Source, Patent Assertion Entity, Private Public Partnership.- A Strategic Framework for Technology Valuation in Agriculture and Allied Sectors in India–Case Study of Chitosan
Abstract Views :203 |
PDF Views:120
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, CIFT Junction, Matsyapuri, P.O Kochi – 682029, IN
2 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad – 500030, IN
1 ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, CIFT Junction, Matsyapuri, P.O Kochi – 682029, IN
2 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad – 500030, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 23, No 2-3 (2018), Pagination: 131-140Abstract
Standardized tools for valuation of agricultural technologies developed in National Agricultural Research System of India are featured in this study with a generalised framework. A valuation pyramid with several levels of qualitative and quantitative approaches was designed. The new framework was articulated by a case study on production of Chitin & Chitosan from crustacean waste, a technology of Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Kochi. The value of the novel technology was calculated using various methods, customized for the specific domain. With few suppositions at every level of the process flow, the value worth of the technology was calculated using different methods. This system attempts to deliver a valuation practice which is suitable for most of the technologies coming up in the public agricultural research system.Keywords
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Agricultural Research System, Reproduction Cost Method, Replacement Cost Method, Competitive Advantage Valuation, IP Valuation Methods, Valuation Pyramid, Chitosan Technology, Net Present Values, Discounted Cash Flow, Surrogate Measures, Monte Carlo Method, OPT Black Scholes, Technology Life Cycle, IP Management.References
- ICAR Guidelines for Intellectual Property Management and Technology Transfer and Commercialization, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi (2006) 68.
- IP Valuation-WIPO Workshop on Innovation, Intellectual Asset Management and Successful Technology Licensing: Wealth Creation in the Arab Region, Muscat, Oman, 12-13 December 2011, 13.
- Final Report from the Expert Group on Intellectual Property Valuation, Brussels: European Commission, 2013, 14-15.
- Marakku H, Enhancing patent valuation with the pay-off method, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 16 (2011) 377-384.
- Smith G V & Russell L P, Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets, Third Edition, Wiley Intellectual Property Series, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2011).
- Harald W, Valuation of intellectual property: A review of approaches and methods, International Journal of Business and Management, 7 (9) (2012) 40-48.
- Chandra N, Valuation of intellectual property rights, Corporate Law Cases, 9 (2005) 465.
- HIPO, IP Valuation at Research Institutes an Essential Tool for Technology Transfer, Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO), Budapest (2016) 8, http://www.hipo.gov.hu.
- Manhattanakul C, Monetising Intellectual property- Aspects of valuation of IP, Sripatum University, Thailand (2013) 62.
- Ranaulo A, Domenico N, Luigi I, Iacobelli M, Techitra S, Torino & Technapoli C Napoli, Technology Valuation for Biotechnology: Techniques for Valuation of Intellectual Property, International Conference on Industrial Biotechnology, (2008) 4.
- Hagelin T, Valuation of patent license, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 12 (2004) 423.
- Hagelin T, Competitive advantage valuation of intellectual property assets: A new tool for IP managers, The Journal of Law and Technology, 44 (4) (2003) 4.
- Flignor P & Orozco D, Intangible Asset and Intellectual Property Valuation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, (2006) 1-17, http://www.ipthought.com.
- Porter M E, How competitive forces shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, 57 (2) (1979) 137–145.
- Tonisson L & Lutz M, Patents, their importance and valuation methods, Fraunhofer MOEZ, Working Paper, (2012) http://publica.fraunhofer.de/starweb/servlet.starweb?path=epub.web&search=N-226453.
- Dong-Hyun Baek, Wonsik S, Hong Kil-Pyo & Kim H, A technology valuation model to support technology transfer negotiations, R&D Management, 37 (2) (2007) 123-138.