Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ramli, Tasya Safiranita
- Copyrighted Content Commercialization on OTT Media in Indonesia
Abstract Views :177 |
Authors
Affiliations
1 Cyber Law and Digital Transformation Center, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung-Sumedang Road, KM 21, West Java, Jawa Barat 45363,, ID
1 Cyber Law and Digital Transformation Center, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung-Sumedang Road, KM 21, West Java, Jawa Barat 45363,, ID
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 26, No 6 (2021), Pagination: 351-356Abstract
Over-the-Top (OTT) can be defined as a service provider delivered through a network and/or infrastructure owned by an operator without directly involving telecommunication operators. OTT as a media can be in a form of video, voice, news, conference, data centre, cloud service, networking service, game, mobile messaging and many others. Initially, OTT was needed as a telecommunications network operator and Internet Service Provider (ISP), hereinafter referred to as an operator. The OTT media was also intended to increase the number of customers and profit earned. Data traffic is predominantly driven by the number of users making cyberspace the main consumption in the form of data, bandwidth and content. OTT has absolutely no accountability to bandwitdh, copyright content and redistribution of content.Full Text
- Identifying, Preventing and Overcoming Trademark Bullying in Indonesia
Abstract Views :206 |
PDF Views:117
Authors
Affiliations
1 Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung-Sumedang Road, KM 21, West Java, ID
1 Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung-Sumedang Road, KM 21, West Java, ID
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 27, No 6 (2022), Pagination: 389-396Abstract
On the one side, trademark owners must be proactive in protecting their trademark from other trademarks to prevent their trademark from becoming generic. However, on the other side, it can cause negative effects for the community, especially trademark owners who are categorized as small business owners. The act of trademark owners excessively protecting their trademarks by accusing small businesses of violating their trademark is termed “trademark bullying”. This article's discussion will focus on a number of important goals. In addition, it will provide explanations and definition of trademark bullying, as well as identifying preventing and overcoming trademark bullying in Indonesia. It can be concluded that trademark bullying has occurred in Indonesia. The disputed issue is the use of a common word that the trademark owner considers an essential element of his/her trademark. To prevent trademark bullying that takes issue with the use of the common word of a brand, Indonesian government must start making regulations on descriptive fair use defense in order to provide legal certainty and healthy business competition. To be able to overcome trademark bullying, victims can try shaming the trademark bullies. It is considered quite effective and can make trademark bullies rethink in sending cease-anddesist letter or lawsuit against small business owners.Keywords
Trademarks, Trademark Bullying, Indonesian Trademark Law, Intellectual Property, Genericide .Full Text
References
- Bone R G, Hunting Goodwill: A history of the concept of goodwill in Trademark Law, Boston University Law Review, 86 (2006) 547, http://www.bu.edu/law/journals-archive/ bulr/volume86n3/documents/BONEv2_000.pdf.
- Dogan S & Lemley M A, The merchandising right: Fragile theory or fait accompli? Stanford Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series, 105 (2004) 1, https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/874.
- Desai D R & Waller S, Brands, Competition, and the Law, BYU Law Review 2010, 5 (2010) 1425, https://core.ac.uk/ download/pdf/217062146.pdf.
- Michael J C, The likelihood of exclusion: Economic disparity in the United States Trademark System, The Journal of the Patent and Trademark Society 100 4 (2019), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3593040.
- Desai D R, From trademarks to brands, Florida Law Review, 64 4 (2012) 981, https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=flr.
- Nguyen Xuan-Thao & Hille E D, Article the puzzle in financing with trademark collateral, Houston Law Review, 56 2 (2018) 365, https://houstonlawreview.org/article/6778-thepuzzle-in-financing-with-trademark-collateral.
- Marlyna H & Sardjono A, Does the Trademark Protection Regulation Protect Consumers against Counterfeit Products? Analyzing the Theories of Trademark and Indonesian Trademark Law, Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 27 3 (2019) 1865, https://scholar.ui.ac.id/en/ publications/does-the-trademark-protection-regulationprotect-consumers-agains.
- Manta I D, Bearing down on trademark bullies, Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 22 4 (2012) 858, https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ iplj/vol22/iss4/3.
- Cuatrecasas L D, Failure to function and trademark law’s outermost bound, New York University Law Review (Forthcoming), 96 (2021) 101, https://ssrn.com/ abstract=3780255.
- Bartow A, Counterfeits, copying and class, Houston Law Review, 48 (2012) 707, https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1115&conte xt=law_facpub.
- Grinvald L C, Shaming trademark bullies, Wisconsin Law Review, 625 (2011) 625, https://cardozoaelj.com/wpcontent/uploads/2021/03/Shaming-TM-Bullies-GrinvaldSSRN-id1739008.pdf.
- Manta I D, Bearing Down on Trademark Bullies, Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 22 (2015) 853.
- USPTO, Report to Congress Trademark Litigation Tactics and Federal Government Services to Protect Trademarks and Prevent Counterfeiting, 2011, https://www.uspto.gov/sites/ default/files/trademarks/notices/TrademarkLitigationStudy.pdf.
- Port K L, Trademark extortion revisited: A response to vogel and schachter, Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 14 1 (2015) 217, http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/ facsch/266.
- Kiser J, To bully or not to bully: Understanding the role of uncertainty in Trademark Enforcement Decisions, Gonzaga University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper, 2 (2016) 211, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2748313.
- Callery T J, Baiting the Hook The Failure of the PTO Trademark Litigation Tactics Report to Dissuade Either Trademark Bullying or Trademark Baiting, Administrative Law Review, 64 4 (2012) 909, http://www.administrativelawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2014/04/Baiting-the-Hook-The-Failure-of-the-PTOTrademark-Litigation-Tactics-Report-to-Dissuade-EitherTrademark-Bullying-or-Trademark-Baiting.pdf.
- Nigam A, Trademark bullying: Enforcement of right or exceedance, International Journal For Legal Research & Analysis, 2 2 (2021), https://ijlra.com/wp-content/ uploads/2021/07/Archita-Nigam.pdf.
- Case No. 958 K/Pdt.Sus/2010.
- Sarie, Proses Negosiasi Sony Masih Alot, 12 March, 2010, https://techno.okezone.com/read/2010/03/12/55/311952/pros es-negosiasi-sony-masih-alot.
- Sarie, Sony Corp Tuntut Sony AK , 12 March 2010, https://techno.okezone.com/read/2010/03/12/55/311908/sony -corp-tuntut-sony-ak.
- Hindarto S Y, Pengamat: Sony Corp Sulit Menang, 12 March 2010, https://techno.okezone.com/read/2010/03/12/55/312091/ pengamat-sony-corp-sulit-menang.
- DetikInet, Apa Alasan Sony Corp Somasi Sony Ak?, 12 March 2010, https://inet.detik.com/law-and-policy/d1317125/apa-alasan-sony-corp-somasi-sony-ak.
- DetikInet, Sony Corp Klarifikasi Somasi Sony AK, 14 March 2010, https://inet.detik.com/law-and-policy/d-1317928/sonycorp-klarifikasi-somasi-sony-ak.
- Case No: 179 PK/PDT.SUS/2012.
- Case No: 48/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.
- Septiadi A, Ruben Onsu Gugat Merek Bensu Milik Pengusaha Kedai Bengkel Susu Jessy Handalim, 11 October 2018, https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ruben-onsu-gugatmerek-bensu-milik-pengusaha-kedai-bengkel-susu-jessyhandalim.
- Ramadhaniswara K T, Ruben Onsu Bukan Pemilik Pertama Merek ‘BENSU’, Sang Pengacara: Singkatan Dari Bengkel Susu, 14 June 2020, https://wow.tribunnews.com/2020/06/ 14/ruben-onsu-bukan-pemilik-pertama-merek-bensu-sangpengacara-singkatan-dari-bengkel-susu?page=2.
- Permata R R, Ramli T S & Utama B, Similarity In Indonesia Trademark Law, NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management, 8 1 (2019), https://iip.ntut.edu.tw/var/file /92/1092/img/Vol8No2-final.pdf.
- Dispoto A J, Protecting small businesses against trademark bullying: Creating a Federal Law to Remove the Disparity of Leverage Trademark Holders Maintain over Small Businesses, San Diego International Law Journal, 16 (2015) 457, https://digital.sandiego.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030& context=ilj.
- Grinvald, Shaming Trademark Bullies.
- Rosenblatt E L, Fear and loathing: Shame, shaming, and intellectual property, DePaul Law Review, 631 (2013) 1, https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol63/iss1/2.
- Marx G, Letter to Warner Brothers: A night in Casablanca, 1945, http://www.ankitoner.com/plunderphonics/05 groucho marx - letter to warner brothers.pdf.
- Kahn M A, Marx Bros v Warner Bros – An amusing lesson in the dangers of trademark bullying, 15 September 2016, https://www.capessokol.com/insights/marx-bros-v-warnerbros-amusing-lesson-dangers-trademark-bullying/.
- Utilization of Non-Fungible Token and Regulatory Challenges In Indonesia: Aspects of Copyright Law
Abstract Views :37 |
Authors
Affiliations
1 Cyber Law and Digital Transformation Center, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, ID
1 Cyber Law and Digital Transformation Center, Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, ID
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 29, No 5 (2024), Pagination: 389-395Abstract
A non-fungible token or NFT is a digital asset that is based on the use of blockchain technology to store digital artwork as aninvestment tool; it has increased the growth of digital trading, especially in marketplaces with huge volumes. However, the regulations in Indonesia have not been able to respond to the aboveconcept, for example, in the aspects of copyright. The article conducts an in-depth analysis of the above concept by determining the extent to which the utilization of NFT in the marketplacein Indonesia can provide economic benefits. It explores whether current regulations on copyright in Indonesia can provide legalprotection and optimize NFT technology. The research usesthe normative legal approach by conducting online library data research.The end of this research is to make inputs into government policies: first, it is expected to draw the attention of government that utilization of NFT in the marketplace are needed today because it can provide economic benefits through its copyright. It would encourage policy and regulatory optimization by the government on NFT technology to be able to provide optimal regulatory or policy directions so that the use of NFTs is in line with copyright protection.Keywords
NFT, Copyright, Electronic TransactionsFull Text