Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Nandekar, Ujwal Prabhakar
- Relationship between Human Rights and Copyright Law: Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract Views :67 |
PDF Views:67
Authors
Affiliations
1 Symbiosis Law School, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune — 411 014, Maharashtra, India., IN
1 Symbiosis Law School, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune — 411 014, Maharashtra, India., IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 1 (2023), Pagination: 15-20Abstract
Human rights are the paramount rights of the human race. Yet they are highly dynamic, much like the times we live in. With the change in human society, the regulations must change to suit the needs as well. This article analyses how Human Rights and Intellectual Property Rights, specifically copyrights are integral to each other when read together. The primary issue is the collision between copyright and the human right of free speech. The article discusses in detail how copyrights form a human right and the need for them to be recognized as the same. The nuance of free speech and copyrights in the internet domain and the need to account for the publisher‟s independence and IPR rights has been discussed. The article attempts to understand the reasons for copyright violations while exercising the human right of free speech and the possible legal solutions to this problem. The purpose of the article is to dig out all the research in this respect and to make the concept clear for future researchers. This bibliometric analysis is implemented using the Scopus and Web of Science repositories.Keywords
Bibliometric Analysis, Copyrights, Free Speech, Human Rights, Intellectual Property Rights.References
- Gordon W, Property right in self-expression: Equality and individusalism in the natural law of intellectual property, Yale Law Journal, 102 (7) (1993) 1533, https:// digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=74 91&context=ylj (accessed on 21 June 2021).
- Tarawneh M A & Helalat A M, Conflict of laws in case of violation to copyrights, European Journal of Social Sciences, 50 (4) (2015) 403, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ Mohamad-Helalat/publication/330366354_Conflict_of_Laws_ in_Case_of_Violation_to_Copyrights/links/5c3c9d5fa6fdccd6 b5ac5515/Conflict-of-Laws-in-Case-of-Violation-to-Copyrights. pdf (accessed on 11 June 2021).
- Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Paris Act of July 24, 1971.
- What is copyright, WIPO, https://www.wipo.int/copyright/ en/ (accessed on 11 June 2021).
- Netanel N, Copyright's Paradox: Property in Expression/ Freedom of Expression, Journal of Scholarly Perspectives, 2 (1) (2006), https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3952g11n (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Helfer L & Graeme A, Human Rights and Intellectual Property, Mapping the Global Interface, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
- Buss K, Copyright and free speech: the Human Rights perspective, Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 8 (2) (2015) 182, doi: 10.1515/bjlp-2015-0024 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Salisu S A & Ojoye O T, Bibliometric analysis of cancer publications in Nigeria during 2008-2012, International Journal of Library and Information Science, 7 (3) (2015) 69, Doi: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS2015.0552 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Gulasekaram P, Policing the Border Between Trademarks and Free Speech: Protecting Unauthorized Trademark Use in Expressive Works, Washington Law Review, 80 (2005) 887, https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/529/ (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Rothman J E, Liberating Copyright: Thinking beyond Free Speech, Cornell Law Review, 95 (2010) 463, https:// scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol95/iss3/6 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Marsoof A, 'Notice and Takedown': A copyright perspective, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 5 (2) (2015) 183, Doi:10.4337/qmjip.2015.02.04 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Von Hannover v Germany (No. 2), European Court of Human Rights, nos. 40660/08; 60641/08 (2012).
- Beiter K, Extraterritorial human rights obligations to “civilize” intellectual property law: Access to textbooks in Africa, copyright, and the right to education, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23 (2020) 232, https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jwip.12150 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Moreno F R, „Upload filters‟ and human rights: implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 34 (2) (2020) 153, https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2020.1733760 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Article 10(2), European Convention on Human Rights, 1950.
- Netanel N, Copyright's paradox, Oxford University Press, 2008.
- Frosio G, Copyright term Extensions: Good Morning to You Productions v Warner/Chappel Productions, Intellectual Property Excesses, 2021, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.3822018 (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Rautdesai R & Nandekar U, Online Photographs in News: Copyright Perspective, Media Watch VIII, 2017, 133.
- Ms Burney, Melissa, & Novak, Pamela, (2002), What is bibliometrics and why should you care? IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 20-20 September 2002, 108-114, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 3977508_What_is_bibliometrics_and_why_should_you_care (accessed on 22 June 2021).
- Nanotechnology Patent Applications and Section 3(d) of Indian Patents Act, 1970: An Empirical Research
Abstract Views :42 |
PDF Views:44
Authors
Affiliations
1 Symbiosis Law School, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune - 411 014, Maharashtra, IN
1 Symbiosis Law School, Pune, Symbiosis International (Deemed) University, Pune - 411 014, Maharashtra, IN
Source
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol 28, No 5 (2023), Pagination: 392-401Abstract
Nanotechnology is an evolving branch of science. It is one of the most promising and radical new technological frontiers. Being a hybrid of chemistry and engineering, nanotechnology holds some peculiarities that cause special problems for the application of Patent Law. India looks forward to develop in every field of Science and Technology including nanotech, and aspires to hold Intellectual Property rights in it. In 2016, India ranked 3rd in the nanotechnology publications after China and USA. The patenting process in nanotechnology is there but yet to increase in favour of domestic applications at the Indian Patent Office coupled with the lack of Indian case law on the subject makes the discussion on the Indian patent regime and nanotechnology most pertinent. Indian Patent Law when applied to the field of nanotechnology raises a number of concerns and difficulties in terms of grant of patent. Therefore, it is necessary to carefully consider whether the Indian Patent System offers a favourable environment for the growth of nanotech industry by motivating patent protection in India. In this research paper, the authors have addressed one specific issue that is of the impact of Section 3(d) of the Indian Patent Act, 1970 on the nanotechnology patent applications in India. The authors propose an amendment in Section 3(d) of the Indian Patent Act, 1970 and some steps that the patent office could take to promote nanotechnology patenting in India and in turn aid the nanotechnology industry growth in India.Keywords
Nanotechnology, Patent, Patent Applications, Nanotechnology Industry, Section 3(d) of Indian Patents Act, 1970References
- Mission on Nano Science and Technology (Nano Mission), https://dst.gov.in/scientific-programmes/mission-nano-science-and-technology-nano-mission.
- Indian National Education Policy, 2020, Page 51, Paragraph 20.6.
- Top 20 countries in publishing nano articles in 2021, 2022, https://statnano.com/news/70227/Top-20-Countries-in-Publishing-Nano-Articles-in-2021.
- Statistics collated from 7 different news reports of Statnano.com. The said 7 different news reports, https://statnano.com/news/52459/StatNano-Releases-World-Ranking-of-ISI-Indexed-Nano-Articles-in-2015; https://statnano.com/news/57105/Ranking-of-Countries-in-Nanotechnology-Publications-in-2016; https://statnano.com/news/61353/Publication-of-More-than-Half-of-Nanotechnology-Articles-in-2017-by-Top-Three-Countries; https://statnano.com/news/65056/Nanotechnology-Publications-of-2018-An-Overview https://statnano.com/news/67470/2019%E2%80%99s-20-Leading-Countries-in-Nanotechnology-Publications https://statnano.com/news/68509/2020%E2%80%99s-Statistical-Review-on-Nanotechnology-Publications https://statnano.com/news/70227/Top-20-Countries-in-Publishing-Nano-Articles-in-2021.
- WIPO IP Statistics Data Center, WIPO IP Portal, (Indicator used ―5a-PCT publications by technology‖), https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/pmhindex.htm?tab=pct.
- Mitchell J, Top 10 new nanotechnology innovations, Technology Insight, IN-PART 2021, https://in-part.com/blog/new-nanotechnology-innovations-top-10/.
- Samal S S & Samal A, Nanoscience and nanotechnology in India: What‘s happening, Electronicsforu, (3rd April 2019), https://www.electronicsforu.com/technology-trends/tech-focus/nanoscience-nanotechnology-india-happening.
- Ganguli P & Jabade S, Nanotechnology Intellectual Property Rights: Research, Design and Commercialization, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2012.
- Barpujari I, The patent regime and nanotechnology: Issues and challenges, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights,15 (2010)206-213.
- Anuar H S, Nawi M N M, Othman W N & Mahidin N, Patent protections, challenges and applications of nanotechnology, Journal of Technology and Operations Management 8 (2) (2013)17-29.
- Nobel pharma A B v Implant Innovations, Inc., 141 E3d 1059, 1070 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Eli Lilly & Co. v Barr Labs., Inc., 251 E3d 955, 968 (Fed. Cir. 2001); In re Soni, 54 F.3d 746, 750 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
- Uhlir N J, Throwing a wrench in the system: Size-dependent properties, inherency, and nanotech patent applications, Fed. Circuit B.J., 16 (2007) 327.
- Molenda J J, The Importance of defining novel terms in patenting nanotechnology inventions, Nanotechnology L. & Bus.1 (2004)174-177.
- 3M Innovative Properties Co. v Avery Dennison Corp., 350 F3d 1365, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (citing Texas Digital Sys., Inc, v Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d at 1204 (Fed. Cir. 2002)).
- Lemley M A, Patenting nanotechnology, Stanford Law Review, 58 (2005) 601-631.
- Zhang Y, Sulfab M & Fernandez D, Intellectual property protection strategies for nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Review, 2 (6) (2013)725-742.
- Costello-Caulkins, Michael, Nanotechnology Patent Law: A case study of The United States and European patent applications, The Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 37 (3) (2021).
- Mishra A K, Wadhai V S & Sontakke R P, To study the role of intellectual property rights in nanotechnology- An Indian perspective, Journal of Applied Science and Research, 4 (2) (2016)12-18.
- Shyam A, Patenting of nanotechnology: An analysis of the legal issues, Journal on Contemporary Issues of Law, 7 (6) (2021).
- What is Nanotechnology? United States National Nanotechnology Initiative, https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/definition.
- Supreme Court of India, 1 April 2013, Civil Appeal No. 2706-2716 of 2013.
- Section 3(e) makes a mere admixture non-patentable.
- Section 10 deals with Specification (Disclosure) and its requirements.