Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Uncitedness of Articles of University Faculty in Karnataka:A Study


Affiliations
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, India
2 Teresian College, Mysuru, India
 

Input Method Editors (IMEs) – keyboard layouts - are the applications essential for converting keystrokes to character in another language. The study examined four different Urdu IMEs (keyboard layouts) to compare them for the creation of bibliographic records in libraries. It was found that there is no significant difference between the keyboards. The implication of the study is that the cataloguers can choose any one of the IMEs of their choice as there is no distinct advantage of any one IME over others.

Keywords

Input Method Editors, IMEs, Keyboards, Indic Keyboards, Urdu Keyboards, Perso- Arabic Scripts, Soft keyboards, Bibliographic Data Entry.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Burrell, Q. L. (2013). A stochastic approach to the relation between the impact factor and the uncitedness factor. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 676-682.
  • Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2004). Demographers and their journals: Who remains uncited after ten years?. Population and Development review, 30(3), 489-506.
  • Danell, R. (2011). Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 50–60.
  • Egghe, L. (2010). The distribution of the uncitedness factor and its functional relation with the impact factor. Scientometrics, 83(3), 689-695.
  • Egghe, L., Guns, R., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1637-1644.
  • Garfield, E. (1998). I had a dream... about uncitedness. The Scientist, 12(14).
  • Hsu, J. W., & Huang, D. W. (2012). A scaling between Impact Factor and uncitedness. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(5), 2129-2134.
  • Lee, C. K. (2003). A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore. Scientometrics, 56(1), 95-110.
  • Rehn, C., & Kronman, U. (2008). Bibliometric handbook for Karolinska Institutet. Huddinge: Karolinska Institutet.
  • van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed, H. F. (2005). Characteristics of journal impact factors: the effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 63(2), 357-371.
  • Yeh, H. Y. et al. (2013). The bibliographic coupling approach to filter the cited and uncited patent citations: A case of electric vehicle technology. Scientometrics, 94(1), 75-93.

Abstract Views: 319

PDF Views: 1




  • Uncitedness of Articles of University Faculty in Karnataka:A Study

Abstract Views: 319  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

J. Manjunatha
Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, India
Tressie Rodrigues
Teresian College, Mysuru, India

Abstract


Input Method Editors (IMEs) – keyboard layouts - are the applications essential for converting keystrokes to character in another language. The study examined four different Urdu IMEs (keyboard layouts) to compare them for the creation of bibliographic records in libraries. It was found that there is no significant difference between the keyboards. The implication of the study is that the cataloguers can choose any one of the IMEs of their choice as there is no distinct advantage of any one IME over others.

Keywords


Input Method Editors, IMEs, Keyboards, Indic Keyboards, Urdu Keyboards, Perso- Arabic Scripts, Soft keyboards, Bibliographic Data Entry.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.32344/jld%2Fv3%2Fi1%2F2017%2F39-52