Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Knowledge Organization and Ranganathan


Affiliations
1 University of Madras & Member-Secretary, Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, India
 

Knowledge Organization (KO) is a sub-discipline at the core of Information 59 Studies. The term knowledge organization is of comparatively recent origin; however. Bliss titled one of his books as Organization of Knowledge in Libraries. Knowledge organization as a discipline has its origins in philosophy; most early classificationists were philosophers. The history of modern library classification, however, begins in the last quarter of the 19th Century with the works of Melville Dewey and Charles Cutter. In the initial decades, however, Classification and Cataloguing were treated as two related but distinct subdisciplines. Even Subject Cataloguing / subject indexing was being treated independently of developments in Classification.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Neelameghan A. and Gopinath, M.A. Postulate-based permuted subject indexing (Lib. Sc. Vol. 12; Paper H; 1975);
  • Neelameghan, A. and K. S. Raghavan. Frames of Knowledge: A perspective of Vedic Hinduism and Dravidian culture (In Smiraglia, Richard P. and Lee, Hur-Li. Cultural Frames of knowledge. – Wurzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2012. p. 19-61);
  • Neelameghan, A. and Raghavan, K. S. Semantics of relationships in knowledge organization: Lateral relationships. SRELS Journal of Information Management. Vol. 42 (4), Dec. 2005. p. 361-382);
  • Neelameghan, A. and Raghavan, K. S. Semantics of relationships in knowledge organization – lateral relationships: update 1 (2006). Information Studies, 12 (2); 115-122;
  • Prataplingam. 1972. Use of seminal mnemonics in the presentation of ideas. DRTC Annual Seminar, 10; Paper AN ;
  • Raghavan, K.S. General Theory of Classification as the basis for Structuring of Subject Headings (In Classification and Communication: Proceedings of the second FID/CR Regional Conference, New Delhi, Nov 1985, p 24-48);
  • Ranganathan, S. R. Heading and Canons: Comparative Study of FiveCatalogueCodes. Madras: S. Viswanathan, 1955;
  • Ranganathan, S. R. Hidden ischolar_mains of classification. Information Storage and Retrieval, Vol. 3; 1967; Sec. 7;
  • Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to library classification (cf. Prolegomena, XB1 and Xb2);
  • Roberts, Norman. An Examination of the Personality Concept and its relevance to the Colon Classification Scheme. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, July 1969 vol. 1 ( 3); 131-148;
  • Dsouza, Renato Rocha,Douglas Tudhope and Mauricio Barcellos Almeida. The KOS Spectra: A tentative typology of knowledge organization systems (In Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization / edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi. – Wurzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2010. p. 122-128;
  • Svenonius, Elaine. The intellectual foundation of information organization. – Cambridge(Mass): The MIT Press, 2000;
  • Weinberger, David. Colon Plan: Rediscovering Ranganathan (accessed on 2nd August2017at http://semanticstudios.com/pdfs/forrester.pdf)

Abstract Views: 269

PDF Views: 0




  • Knowledge Organization and Ranganathan

Abstract Views: 269  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

K. S. Raghavan
University of Madras & Member-Secretary, Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, India

Abstract


Knowledge Organization (KO) is a sub-discipline at the core of Information 59 Studies. The term knowledge organization is of comparatively recent origin; however. Bliss titled one of his books as Organization of Knowledge in Libraries. Knowledge organization as a discipline has its origins in philosophy; most early classificationists were philosophers. The history of modern library classification, however, begins in the last quarter of the 19th Century with the works of Melville Dewey and Charles Cutter. In the initial decades, however, Classification and Cataloguing were treated as two related but distinct subdisciplines. Even Subject Cataloguing / subject indexing was being treated independently of developments in Classification.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.32344/jld%2Fv3%2Fi2%2F2017%2F59-66