Journal of Library Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Use of Google Scholar:A Case Study of Faculty Members of Science And Technology, Gulbarga University, Kalburgi


Affiliations
1 Asst. Librarian, Dayananda Sagar University, Library and Information Centre, Bangalore, India
2 Chief Librarian, Dayananda Sagar University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
 

This paper deals with the Use of Google Scholar: A case study of faculty members of science and Technology, Gulbarga University, Kalburgi. This paper provides in summary form the important findings and suggestions/recommendation to improve and usefulness of the faculty members in a university environment and its features, & benefits.

Keywords

Use of Google Scholar, Faculty Members, University.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Almind, T.C., and Ingwersen, P. 1997. Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to Webometrics. Journal of Documentation 53(4): 404-26.

  • Barbara Quint. Changes at Google Scholar: A conversation with Anurag Acharya, Journal of library administration, 47(1/2):2008, pp. 77-79.

  • Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006). Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 7. Retrieved December 20, 2008, from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1533854

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.

  • Gail Herrera. Google scholar User and user behaviors: an Exploratory study, college and research libraries, 72(4):2011, pp. 316-330.

  • Google.com (http://www.Goolge.com)

  • Google Scholar. 2005. About Google Scholar. URL: http://www.scholar.google.com/scholar/about. Html [viewed September 20, 2005].

  • Hamid R. Jamali: Saeid Asadi. Google and the Scholar: The role of Google in scientist information-Seeking Behavior, Online information review; 34(2):2010 pp. 282-294.

  • Henderson J. Google Scholar: a Source for clinicians? (MA). 172(12): 1549-50.

  • Jared L. Howland; Thomas C. Wright; Rebecca A; Bough an; Brian C. Robert. How Scholarly is Google scholar? A Comparison to library, 70(3):2009.

  • John J. Meier, Thomas w. Cockling. Google Scholar’s coverage of the engineering literature: A empirical study. Journal of academic librarianship, 34(3):2008, pp.196-201.

  • Judit Bar-llan. Which h-index? A comparison of WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar, scientometrics, 74(2): 2008, pp. 257-271.

  • Kiduk Yang, Lokman I. Meho. Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol 43; No 1; Year 2006. 185.

  • Kirk Kirksey. Google scholar, computer edge. 2005.

  • Isidro f. Aguillo. Is Google scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webmeric analysis, the cybernetics lab, 2012, pp. 343-351.


Abstract Views: 377

PDF Views: 3




  • Use of Google Scholar:A Case Study of Faculty Members of Science And Technology, Gulbarga University, Kalburgi

Abstract Views: 377  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Amarnath
Asst. Librarian, Dayananda Sagar University, Library and Information Centre, Bangalore, India
J. C. David
Chief Librarian, Dayananda Sagar University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Abstract


This paper deals with the Use of Google Scholar: A case study of faculty members of science and Technology, Gulbarga University, Kalburgi. This paper provides in summary form the important findings and suggestions/recommendation to improve and usefulness of the faculty members in a university environment and its features, & benefits.

Keywords


Use of Google Scholar, Faculty Members, University.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.32344/jld%2Fv6%2Fi1%2F2020%2F19-36