Journal of Physics & Astronomy

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Physicalist Theories as Science and Physicalist Theories as Philosophy


Affiliations
1 Department of Academic Affairs, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA., United States
 

Physicists and philosophers sometimes claim that all of the phenomena of the universe, as in “theories of everything,” are or should be explainable in terms of the elementary constituents of matter or elementary particles; I seek to show that physicalist theories that attempt to reduce “higher order” phenomena in chemistry, bio-chemistry, biology, and the neuroscience of mind, brain, and consciousness to explanations involving elementary particles are either untestable or not empirically valid; moreover, I seek to show that there are successful cases of reduction in science, such as in chemistry, bio-chemistry, neuroscience, and evolutionary biology including Darwinism, that do not necessarily involve or imply “physicalism” or the tenets of physicalist theories; I also seek to show that physicalist theories undermine and do not address the empirical and theoretical content of successful discoveries and theories at different levels of reality, and within and across different branches of science.

Keywords

Elementary Particles, Penrose, Roger, Reductionism, Neuroscience, Written Languages, Moore’s Law, Graphical User Interfaces.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Penrose R. On understanding. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 1997;11(1):7-20

  • Crick F, Koch C. A framework for consciousness. Nature neuroscience. 2003;6(2):119-26.

  • Tononi G. Consciousness as integrated information: a provisional manifesto. Biol. Bull. 2008;215(3):216-42.

  • Boly M, Phillips C, Tshibanda L, et al. Intrinsic brain activity in altered states of consciousness: how conscious is the default mode of brain function?. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1129(1):119-29.

  • Darwin C. The origin of species: A variorum text. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2010.

  • Wallace AR. Natural selection and tropical nature: Essays on descriptive and theoretical biology. Macmillan Co.; 1891.

  • Hameroff SR, Penrose R. Conscious events as orchestrated space-time selections. J. conscious. stud. 1996;3(1):36-53.

  • Hameroff S, Penrose R. Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness. Math. comput. simul. 1996;40(3-4):453-80.

  • Portosa Stevens, C. Three Dimensional Venn diagram as an Explanation of Two Kinds of Generality in Science, Invention, & Engineering. 2021.

  • American Physical Society. Einstein’s Quest for a Unified Theory. 2005.

  • E. Witten. What every physicist should know about string theory. 2015. Physics Today

  • Rorty R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton university press; 2009.

  • Quine. W.V. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1961

  • Scupin R. Cultural anthropology: A global perspective. SAGE Publications; 2019.

  • Kroeber AL. Configurations of culture growth. Univ of California Press; 1969.

  • Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. science. 2002;298(5598):1569-79.

  • Hymes DH. " In vain I tried to tell you": Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics. U of Nebraska Press; 2004.

  • Morris CW. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Foundations of the Theory of Signs. University of Chicago Press; 1938.

  • Massey, G. Reflections on the Unity of Science. Ann. Jpn. Assoc. Philos. Sci.1973;4:203-212.

  • Little, D. Vienna Circle on Interdisciplinary Science. 2009

  • Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Edusp; 1994.


Abstract Views: 83

PDF Views: 0




  • Physicalist Theories as Science and Physicalist Theories as Philosophy

Abstract Views: 83  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Christopher Portosa Stevens
Department of Academic Affairs, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA., United States

Abstract


Physicists and philosophers sometimes claim that all of the phenomena of the universe, as in “theories of everything,” are or should be explainable in terms of the elementary constituents of matter or elementary particles; I seek to show that physicalist theories that attempt to reduce “higher order” phenomena in chemistry, bio-chemistry, biology, and the neuroscience of mind, brain, and consciousness to explanations involving elementary particles are either untestable or not empirically valid; moreover, I seek to show that there are successful cases of reduction in science, such as in chemistry, bio-chemistry, neuroscience, and evolutionary biology including Darwinism, that do not necessarily involve or imply “physicalism” or the tenets of physicalist theories; I also seek to show that physicalist theories undermine and do not address the empirical and theoretical content of successful discoveries and theories at different levels of reality, and within and across different branches of science.

Keywords


Elementary Particles, Penrose, Roger, Reductionism, Neuroscience, Written Languages, Moore’s Law, Graphical User Interfaces.

References