Journal of Rural Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Shifting Cultivation in Manipur:Land, Labour and Environment


Affiliations
1 Institute for Social and Economic Change, Dr. VKRV Rao Road, Nagarabhavi PO, Bengaluru – 560072 (Karnataka), India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Shifting cultivation is the main source of livelihood system in the hill areas of Manipur, one of the north-eastern States in India. It is widely prevalent due to lack of alternative farm employment. Its inputs are crude and traditional in nature resulting in subsistence income. Shifting cultivation is labour-intensive and has a traditional character. Empirical evidence shows that rapid population growth has increased the use of forest land for shifting cultivation in Manipur. The system's cycle has substantially declined due to population pressure on land thereby reducing the productivity. It has resulted in environmental degradation and problems of forest land re-vegetation. It has also led to a huge loss of forest resources every year. Its production is mostly organic due to sparingly use of inorganic fertilisers. Institutional changes in the form of private ownership of land have resulted in commercialisation of forest products like timber and firewood. Land use and forest laws need to be strengthened to safeguard and protect forest land. Ensuring food security and restructuring of land ownership system from community to private may reduce the practice of shifting cultivation and conserve forest cover.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bhattacharya, B. and Nanda S. K (2005), “Shifting Cultivation in North-east India: Technological Alternatives and Extension Implication”, in Bandopadhyay A., Sundaram K. V., Moni M., Kundu P.S and Mrityunjay M. Jha (Eds.), “Sustainable Agriculture: Issues in Production, Management, Agronomy and ICT Application”, Delhi, Northern Book Centre.

  • Bowler, Ian (2002), “Developing Sustainable Agriculture”, Geography, 87(3), 205-212.

  • Cramb, R. A (1988), “The Use and Productivity of Labour in Shifting Cultivation: An East Malaysian Case Study”, paper presented at the 32nd annual conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, February 8–11.

  • Central Statistics Organisation (2013), (October 16, 2013> http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/admin/ publication.aspx).

  • DES (2001), “Statistical Abstract of Manipur 2001”, Imphal, Directorate of Economics& Statistics.

  • DES (2007), “Report on Crop Estimation Survey: Manipur 2006-07”, Imphal, Directorate of Economics & Statistics.

  • DES (2014), “Economic Survey Manipur 2013-14”, Imphal, Directorate of Economics & Statistics.

  • Eden, Michael. J(1993), “Swidden Cultivation in Forest and Savanna in Lowland Southwest Papua New Guinea”, Human Ecology, 21(2), pp. 145-166.

  • Forestry Department(1985), “Changes in Shifting Cultivation in Africa”, FAO Forestry Paper 50, (February 15, 2015> http://www.fao.org/docrep/r5265e/r5265e06.htm#TopOfPage).

  • FSI (1987), “TheState of Forest Report”, Dehra Dun, Ministry of Environment and Forests.

  • FSI, (1995), “TheState of Forest Report”, Dehra Dun, Ministry of Environment and Forests.

  • FSI, (2005), “State of Forest Report”, Dehra Dun: Ministry of Environment and Forests.

  • FSI (2011), “India State of Forest Report”, Dehra Dun: Ministry of Environment and Forest.

  • FSI (2013), “India State of Forest Report”, Dehra Dun: Ministry of Environment and Forest.

  • Godden, Gertrude M (1898), “Naga and Other Frontier Tribes of North-East India”, The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 27, 2-51.

  • Gupta, A. K (2000), “Shifting Cultivation and Conservation of Biological Diversity in Tripura, Northeast India”, Human Ecology, 28(4), 605-629.

  • Gupta, S (2006), “Manipur State Development Report”, Imphal: Planning Department.

  • Hueiyen News Service (2011), “Reserved Forest Area in Manipur Reducing: Reports”, E-Pao, March 28 (January 1, 2015>http://e-pao.net/GP.asp?src=18..290311.mar11).

  • IBCN (2011), “Important Bird Areas in India – Manipur”, Indian Bird Conservation Network, December 30 (January 12, 2015> http://ibcn.in/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/30-735_753-manipur.pdf ).

  • Jamir, R. N and Lianchawii (2013), “Sustainable Land and Ecosystem Management in Shifting Cultivation Areas of Nagaland”, Dehradun: Directorate of Extension Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education.

  • Jarosz, Lucy (1993), “Defining and Explaining Tropical Deforestation: Shifting Cultivation and Population Growth in Colonial Madagascar (1896-1940)”, Economic Geography, 69, 366-379.

  • Kerkhoff, Elisabeth and Eklabya Sharma (2006), “Debating Shifting Cultivation in the Eastern Himalayas: Farmers’ Innovations as Lessons for Policy”, Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.

  • Maithani, B. P(2005), “Shifting Cultivation in North-East India: Policies Issues and Options”, Delhi Mittal Publication.

  • MEF and GBPIHED (2009), “Governance for Sustaining Himalayan Ecosystem Guidelines & Best Practices”, Delhi, Ministry of Environment & Forests and G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment & Development.

  • Mellor, John W (1962), “The Process of Agricultural Development in Low-Income Countries”, Journal of Farm Economics, 44(3), 700-716.

  • Ministry of Agriculture (1983), “Task Force on Shifting Cultivation”, Delhi, Ministry of Agriculture.

  • MLR & LR Act (1960), “Directorate of Settlement and Land Records”, (January 17, 2015> http:// manipurrev.nic.in/notes/MLRLRAct.pdf ).

  • MODONER and NEC (2008), “North Eastern Region Vision 2020”, Delhi: Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region and North East Council.

  • Mukherji, G. B (2010), “Report of the Task Force to Look into Problems of Hill States and Hill Areas and to Suggest Ways to Ensure that these States and Areas do not Suffer in Any Way Because of their Peculiarities”, Delhi, Planning Commission.

  • Ninan, K. N (1992), “Economics of Shifting Cultivation in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 27(13), A2-A6.

  • Peale, S. E (1874), “The Nagas and Neighbouring Tribes”, The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 3, 476-481.

  • Roy, R. D., Xavier B. and William M’Vidouboulou S (2012), “Study on Shifting Cultivation and the Socio-Cultural Integrity of Indigenous Peoples”, Economic and Social Council, United Nations, New York (February 20, 2015> http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N12/241/85/PDF/ N1224185.pdf?OpenElement).

  • Sachchidananda (1989), “Shifting Cultivation in India, Delhi, Concept Publishing Company.

  • Sastry, K. L. N. et al (2007), “Nationwide Forest Encroachment Mapping Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques - Manipur State”, Ahmedabad: Manipur Forest Department and Manipur State Remote Sensing Applications Centre and Space Applications Centre –ISRO.

  • Seavoy, Ronald E (1973), “The Shading Cycle in Shifting Cultivation”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 63(4), 522-528.

  • Shakespear, J (1909), “TheKuki-Lushai Clans”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 39, 371-385.

  • Shimray, U. A (2004), “Women’s Work in Naga Society: Household Work, Workforce Participation and Division of Labour”, Economic and Political Weekly, 39(17), 1698-1711.

  • Srinivas, K. Ravi (1996), “Sustainable Agriculture, Biotechnology and Emerging Global Trade Regime”, Economic and Political Weekly, 31(29), 1922-1923.

  • Thomas, William L. Jr. (1968), “Shifting Cultivation in South Eastern Asia” by J. E. Spencer (1966), Geographical Review, 58(1), 148-149.


Abstract Views: 275

PDF Views: 121




  • Shifting Cultivation in Manipur:Land, Labour and Environment

Abstract Views: 275  |  PDF Views: 121

Authors

Marchang Reimeingam
Institute for Social and Economic Change, Dr. VKRV Rao Road, Nagarabhavi PO, Bengaluru – 560072 (Karnataka), India

Abstract


Shifting cultivation is the main source of livelihood system in the hill areas of Manipur, one of the north-eastern States in India. It is widely prevalent due to lack of alternative farm employment. Its inputs are crude and traditional in nature resulting in subsistence income. Shifting cultivation is labour-intensive and has a traditional character. Empirical evidence shows that rapid population growth has increased the use of forest land for shifting cultivation in Manipur. The system's cycle has substantially declined due to population pressure on land thereby reducing the productivity. It has resulted in environmental degradation and problems of forest land re-vegetation. It has also led to a huge loss of forest resources every year. Its production is mostly organic due to sparingly use of inorganic fertilisers. Institutional changes in the form of private ownership of land have resulted in commercialisation of forest products like timber and firewood. Land use and forest laws need to be strengthened to safeguard and protect forest land. Ensuring food security and restructuring of land ownership system from community to private may reduce the practice of shifting cultivation and conserve forest cover.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd.v36i1.141870