Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Public Investment on Rural Road Transport and its Effect on Agricultural Crop Production: Evidence from Ethiopian Living Standard Measurement Survey (LSMS)


Affiliations
1 Addis Ababa University and Researcher, Centre for Development Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
2 Addis Ababa University College of Development Studies, Centre for Rural Development Studies, Ethiopia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Public investment on rural road transport system is an important factor affecting the growth and transformation of agriculture. Considering this fact, Ethiopia has made relatively massive investments in the development of roads to tackle isolation and improve the welfare of the rural poor. However, despite such efforts, rural road development indicators show that Ethiopia’s rural road transport has still remained low. As a result, close to 70 per cent of the rural population in Ethiopia still travels about six hours to reach all-weather roads. Besides, most rural roads are dry weather roads that cannot be passable by any formal transport modes during the wet season. Against this background, we investigated the effect of rural transport (access and mobility) on crop production in Ethiopia using a unique panel data from rural Ethiopia. We used both descriptive statistics and Econometric model to understand the effect of rural transport on crop production. The result of the analysis revealed that there exist low utilisation of modern mode of transport for agricultural activities and by far foot is still largely dominant mode of transport for agricultural purposes. On the other hand, the Econometric analysis revealed an interesting result. That is, while access to all-weather roads has a positive but insignificant effect on crop production, the effect of mode of transport was found to be positive and significant. The policy implication is improving rural roads to a level of all-weather road standards and provisions, and transport facilities should still be a priority for policymakers.


Keywords

Rural Road Investments, Access to Road, Mode of Transport, Cobb-Douglas Production Model, Fixed Effect, Random Effect.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Antle, J. M., and Susan, M. (1988), Agricultural Productivity: Measurements and Explanations, In: Resource for the Future, 1988.
  • Battese, E., and Coelli, T. J. (1995), A Model for Technical Inefficiency in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data, Empirical Economics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 325-332.
  • Coelli, T. (1996), A Guide to Data Envelopment Analysis Program Version 2. Working Paper, Queensland, Australia, Centre for Efficciency and Effectiveness Analysis.
  • Dercon, S., Gilligan, D.O., Hoddinott, J.,Woldehanna, T, (2009), The Impact of Agricultural Extension and Roads on Poverty and Consumption Growth in Fifteen Ethiopian Villages, IFPRI Discussion Paper 00840.
  • Ethiopian Road Authority (ERA), (2014), Assessment of 17 Years Performance Road Sector, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Fan, S., P. Hazell, S. Thorat. (2000), "Government Spending, Growth, and Poverty in Rural India," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 82, No.4, pp. 1038–1051.
  • Fan, S; L Zhang, and X. Zhang. (2002), Growth, Inequality and Poverty in Rural China: Role of Public Investment, Research Report 125, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C.
  • International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, (2014), Annual Report, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank.
  • Khachatryan, A., Von Oppen, Matthias, Doluschitz, Reiner and Khachatryand N. (2005), Response of Plant Productivity to Improved Agricultural Markets in India: Application of an Advanced Econometric CrossSection Time Series Analysis, Tropentag Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Stuttgart-Hohenheim, October 11-13, 2005.
  • Lulit, A. T. (2012), Impact of Road on Rural Poverty. Evidence Form Fifteen Rural Villages in Ethiopia.In partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of Masters of arts in development studies Specialization: Economics of Development (ECD).
  • Makhura, MN and Mokoena, M (2003), Market Access for Small-scale Farmers in South Africa, In: Nieuwoudt L and Groenewald J (eds), The Challenge of Change: Agriculture Land and the South African Economy, Scottsville, South Africa.
  • Ministry of Finance and Economic Development (MoFED), (2006), Building on Progress, A Plan for Accelerated and Sustained Development to End Poverty (PASDEP) (2005/06-2009/10), Addis Ababa.
  • Pinstrup-Anderson, P and Shimokawa, S. (2006), Demands on and Challenges for South African Agriculture, In: Nieuwoudt L and Groenewald J (eds), The Challenge of Change: Agriculture Land and the South African Economy, Scottsville, South Africa.
  • Wondemu, K. A., and Weissb, J. (2012), Rural Roads and Development: Evidence from Ethiopia, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 417-439.
  • Worku, Ibrahim (2011), Road Sector Development and Economic Growth in Ethiopia, EDRI Working Paper 4, Ethiopian Development Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Abstract Views: 181

PDF Views: 1




  • Public Investment on Rural Road Transport and its Effect on Agricultural Crop Production: Evidence from Ethiopian Living Standard Measurement Survey (LSMS)

Abstract Views: 181  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Naod Mekonnen
Addis Ababa University and Researcher, Centre for Development Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Bamlaku Alemarew
Addis Ababa University College of Development Studies, Centre for Rural Development Studies, Ethiopia

Abstract


Public investment on rural road transport system is an important factor affecting the growth and transformation of agriculture. Considering this fact, Ethiopia has made relatively massive investments in the development of roads to tackle isolation and improve the welfare of the rural poor. However, despite such efforts, rural road development indicators show that Ethiopia’s rural road transport has still remained low. As a result, close to 70 per cent of the rural population in Ethiopia still travels about six hours to reach all-weather roads. Besides, most rural roads are dry weather roads that cannot be passable by any formal transport modes during the wet season. Against this background, we investigated the effect of rural transport (access and mobility) on crop production in Ethiopia using a unique panel data from rural Ethiopia. We used both descriptive statistics and Econometric model to understand the effect of rural transport on crop production. The result of the analysis revealed that there exist low utilisation of modern mode of transport for agricultural activities and by far foot is still largely dominant mode of transport for agricultural purposes. On the other hand, the Econometric analysis revealed an interesting result. That is, while access to all-weather roads has a positive but insignificant effect on crop production, the effect of mode of transport was found to be positive and significant. The policy implication is improving rural roads to a level of all-weather road standards and provisions, and transport facilities should still be a priority for policymakers.


Keywords


Rural Road Investments, Access to Road, Mode of Transport, Cobb-Douglas Production Model, Fixed Effect, Random Effect.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.25175/jrd%2F2018%2Fv37%2Fi4%2F111484