Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Performance Evaluation of a Grinding Wheel Using Aggressiveness Number
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Under high temperature and stress, the wheel-workpiece contact zone experiences plastic deformation followed by adhesion at the junctions, resulting in the development of micro welds. As a result, the grits lose their sharpness, making the grinding wheel dull and raising both the grinding forces and temperature. Previous studies have suggested numerous ways of increasing grinding efficacy. The present study introduces a novel method to map the specific energy and surface roughness using a dimensionless entity known as the aggressiveness number. The surface grinding operation of medium carbon steel was performed using a vitrified bonded alumina wheel (A60K5V) under dry condition for varied grinding parameters. The corresponding grinding forces were measured to calculate the specific energy consumption of the process. Afterword, the variation of surface roughness values with process parameters has also been calculated. The verification results revealed that specific energy consumption was inversely proportional to aggressiveness number, whereas the relationship between surface roughness and aggressiveness number was non-linear. The findings of this study are likely to assist machine operators in selecting the appropriate parameters required to enhance surface finish.
Keywords
Line Aggressiveness Number, Plunge Surface Grinding, Specific Energy, Surface Roughness.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- Adibi, H., Rezaei, S. M., & Sarhan, A. A. D. (2013). Analytical modeling of grinding wheel loading phenomena. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(1-4), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4745-z
- Badger, J. (2008). Practical application of aggressiveness and chip thickness in grinding. Annals of the CIRP 3rd International Conference High Performance Cutting (HPC), Dublin, Ireland, 599-606.
- Badger, J., Dražumerič, R., & Krajnik, P. (2021). Application of the dimensionless Aggressiveness number in abrasive processes. Procedia CIRP, 102,361-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procir.2021.09.062
- Brinksmeier, E., Aurich, J. C., Govekar, E., Heinzel, C., Hoffmeister, H. W., Klocke, F., Peters, J., Rentsch, R., Stephenson, D. J., Uhlmann, E., Weinert, K., & Wittmann, M. (2006). Advances in modeling and simulation of grinding processes. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 55(2), 667-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2006.10.003
- Darafon, A., Warkentin, A., & Bauer, R. (2013). 3D metal removal simulation to determine uncut chip thickness, contact length, and surface finish in grinding. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66(9-12), 1715-1724.https://doi.org /10.1007/s00170-012-4452-1
- Dražumerič, R., Badger, J., Roininen, R., & Krajnik, P. (2020). On geometry and kinematics of abrasive processes: The theory of aggressiveness. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 154,103567. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103567 https://www.azom.com. (2020)
- Malkin, S. (1976). Selection of Operating Parameters in Surface Grinding of Steels.Journal of Engineering for Industry, 98(1), 56-62. https:// doi.org/10.1115/1.3438872
- Malkin, S., & Guo, C. (2008). Grinding technology: theory and application of machining with abrasives (2nd ed.), Industrial Press, New York.
- Setti, D., Ghosh, S., & Rao, P. V. (2017). A method for prediction of active grits count in surface grinding. Wear,(382-383), 71-77. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.04.012
- Shinozaki, K., Yokoi, M., Uematsu, K., Mizutani, N., Kato, M., Okada, S., & Kameyama, T. (n.d.). Study on Grinding Wheel Manufacture Vitrified Bonded Alumina Abrasive Wheel.
Abstract Views: 61
PDF Views: 0