Northern Journal of ISA

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Intermittent Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion Technique for Post Operative Analgesia


Affiliations
1 Kanika Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
 

Background and Aim: A consensus is yet to evolve over which of the two techniques, continuous epidural infusion or intermittent epidural bolus is better for post-op pain relief. The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of postoperative pain relief between continuous and bolus administrations of epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl solution. Material and Methods: The prospective, randomized study was conducted in 60 ASA I and ASA II patients of either sex, 20-50 years age scheduled for orthopedic lower limb surgery. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia was administered to all the patients. Following an epidural loading dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1.5 μg ml-1 post-operatively, group I (n = 30) patients received intermittent bolus of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1.5 μg mlml-1 at an hourly interval for 24 hours and group II (n = 30) patients received same drug combination through continuous epidural infusion technique at a rate of 10 ml hr-1 for 24 hours. Following variables were assessed during the study period of 24 hours: Pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry (SpO2), pain score (VAS), pruritus score, sedation score, sensory block and motor block. All the parameters were analysed statistically by adopting appropriate statistical tests. Results: On comparison, pain scores were statistically not significant in both groups (p>0.05). When compared within the respective groups, variation in pain score, both at rest and on movement, from the baseline value (zero hours postoperatively) were statistically not significant at all the time intervals in both the groups (p>0.05). Fifteen patients in the group I and five patients in group II required rescue analgesia (p<0.05). Thirteen patients (46.6%) in group I and 19 patients (63.33%) in group II assessed pain relief as excellent at the end of 24 hours of epidural analgesia (p<0.05). No adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. Conclusion: Continuous epidural infusion of a combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl provides better postoperative analgesia requiring less rescue analgesia than intermittent epidural bolus technique.


Keywords

Bupivacaine, Continuous Epidural Infusion, Epidural Analgesia, Fentanyl, Intermittent Epidural Bolus, Postoperative Analgesia.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bell SD, Seltzer JL. Postoperative pain management. In: Kaplan JA, editor. Vascular Anaesthesia. 1st ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1991. p. 565–86.

  • Rutberg H, Hakanson E, Anderberg B, Jorfeldt L, Martensson J, Schildt B. Effects of the extradural administration of morphine or bupivacaine on the endocrine response to upper abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 1984;56:233–7.

  • Scott NB, Mogensen T, Bigler D, Lund C, Kehlet H. Continuous thoracic extradural 0.55 bupivacaine with or without morphine: Effect on quality of blockade. Br J Anaesth 1989;2:253–7.

  • Shulman M, Sandler AN, Bradley JW, Young PS, Brebner J. Post thoracotomy pain and pulmonary function following epidural and systemic morphine. Anesthesiology 1984;61:569–75.

  • Cuschieri RJ, Mussan CG, Howie JC, Mcrdle CS. Post operative pain and pulmonary complications: Comparison of three analgesic regimens. Br J Surg 1985;72:495–8.

  • Liu S, Carpenter RL, Neal JM. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia: Their role in postoperative outcome. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1474–506.

  • Brodner G, Aken HV, Hertle LO, Fobker M. Multimodal perioperative management combining thoracic epidural analgesia, forced mobilization and oral nutrition reduces hormonal and metabolic stress and improves convalescence after major urologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1594–600.

  • Renck H, Edstran H. Thoracc epidural analgesia III-prolongation in the early postoperative period by intermittent injections of etidocaine with adrenaline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1976;20:104–10.

  • Lamont RF, Pinney D, Rodgers P, Bryant TN. Continuous versus intermittent epidural analgesia. A Randomized trial to observe obstetric outcome. Anaesthesia 1989;44:893–6.

  • Ducan LA, Fried MJ, Lee A, Wildsmith JA. Comparison of continuous and intermittent administration of extradural bupivacaine for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:7–10.

  • Fettes PDW, Moore CS, Whiteside JB, Mcleod GA, Wildsmith JAW. Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:359–64.

  • Kanai A, Kinoshita S, Suzuki A, Okamoto H, Hoka S. Advantage of ropivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia following leg orthopedic surgery. Masui 2005;54:8–13.

  • Kampe S, Randebrock G, Keincke P, Hunseler U, Cranfield K. Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and sufentanil with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after total hip replacement. Anaesthesia 2001;56:1189–92.

  • Salim R, Nachum Z, Moscovici R, Lavee M, Shalev E. Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labour and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:301–6.

  • Pitimana AS, Visalyaputra S, Komoltri C , Muangman S, Tiviraj S, Puangchan S, et al. An economic evaluation of bupivacaine plus fentanyl versus ropivacaine alone for patient controlled epidural analgesia after total knee replacement procedure: A double blinded randomized study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005;30:446–51.

  • Smedstad KG, Morison DH. A comparative study of continuous and intermittent epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. Can J Anaesth 1988;35:234–41.

  • Hicks JA, Jenkins JG, Newton MC, Findly IL. Continuous epidural infusion of 0.075% bupivacaine for pain relief in labour. A comparision with intermittent top-ups of 0.5% bupivacaine. Anaesthesia 1988;43:289–92.

  • Scott DA, Beilby DS, Mcclymont C. Postoperative analgesia using epidural infusion of fentanyl with bupivacaine. A prospective analysis of 1,014 patients. Anesthesiology 1995;83:727–37.


Abstract Views: 259

PDF Views: 82




  • Intermittent Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion Technique for Post Operative Analgesia

Abstract Views: 259  |  PDF Views: 82

Authors

Naveen Malhotra
Kanika Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
Ravinder Singh
Kanika Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
Sarla Hooda
Kanika Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
Vishal Singla
Kanika Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
Kanika
Kanika Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India

Abstract


Background and Aim: A consensus is yet to evolve over which of the two techniques, continuous epidural infusion or intermittent epidural bolus is better for post-op pain relief. The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of postoperative pain relief between continuous and bolus administrations of epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl solution. Material and Methods: The prospective, randomized study was conducted in 60 ASA I and ASA II patients of either sex, 20-50 years age scheduled for orthopedic lower limb surgery. Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia was administered to all the patients. Following an epidural loading dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1.5 μg ml-1 post-operatively, group I (n = 30) patients received intermittent bolus of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1.5 μg mlml-1 at an hourly interval for 24 hours and group II (n = 30) patients received same drug combination through continuous epidural infusion technique at a rate of 10 ml hr-1 for 24 hours. Following variables were assessed during the study period of 24 hours: Pulse rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry (SpO2), pain score (VAS), pruritus score, sedation score, sensory block and motor block. All the parameters were analysed statistically by adopting appropriate statistical tests. Results: On comparison, pain scores were statistically not significant in both groups (p>0.05). When compared within the respective groups, variation in pain score, both at rest and on movement, from the baseline value (zero hours postoperatively) were statistically not significant at all the time intervals in both the groups (p>0.05). Fifteen patients in the group I and five patients in group II required rescue analgesia (p<0.05). Thirteen patients (46.6%) in group I and 19 patients (63.33%) in group II assessed pain relief as excellent at the end of 24 hours of epidural analgesia (p<0.05). No adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. Conclusion: Continuous epidural infusion of a combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl provides better postoperative analgesia requiring less rescue analgesia than intermittent epidural bolus technique.


Keywords


Bupivacaine, Continuous Epidural Infusion, Epidural Analgesia, Fentanyl, Intermittent Epidural Bolus, Postoperative Analgesia.

References