Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial


Affiliations
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Satguru Pratap Singh Hospital, Ludhiana, India
 

Background and Aims: Ultrasound Guided (USG) Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a relatively new regional analgesic technique for postoperative pain relief after abdominal surgery. However, the efficacy and safety of TAP block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not well established. This prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study was designed to compare analgesic efficacy of USG guided TAP block over conventional analgesics in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery during post-operative period. Methods: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised into two groups. Patients in Group A (n = 50) received standard analgesics along with USG guided TAP block after induction of anaesthesia while patients in Group B (n = 50) received only standard analgesics postoperatively as per standard protocols of the institution. USG guided TAP block was given using high frequency linear probe (6-13 MHz) with 'in-plane' technique. Once the tip of the needle was confirmed in the facial plane between the Internal Oblique muscle and Transverse Abdominis muscle, Injection Ropivacaine 0.25%, 30 ml was administered bilaterally. Each patient was monitored in Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Time duration for demanding first dose of opioid, total dose of opioid used, opioid induced and TAP block technique related complications, hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores on rest and coughing at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours were recorded in each patient. At the end of study data was analysed using appropriate statistical tests and value of p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Group A patients had a lesser demand of opioid (mean ± SD) 2.44 ± 2.44 mg as compared to patients in Group B (3.96 ± 2.56 mg)(P<0.01). VAS scores at rest and coughing were (mean ± SE) 1.21 ± 0.07 and 1.43 ± 0.01 in group A and 1.72 ± 0.09 and 2.18 ± 0.18 in Group B (P<0.01). There was no difference in time duration for demanding first dose of opioid by patient postoperatively, hospital stay, and opioid related complications in both groups. There was no TAP block technique related complication seen during study. Patients had better analgesic satisfaction after TAP block. Conclusion: USG guided TAP block is a safe and effective mode of postoperative analgesia in 24 hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopy, Ultrasound Guided TAP Block.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2000; 87:273–84. Crossref PMid:10718794
  • Barczynski M, Herman RM. A prospective randomized trial on comparison of Low-Pressure (LP) and Standard-Pressure (SP) pneumoperitonium for laparoscopic cholecystctomy. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17:533–8. Crossref PMid:12582754
  • Mouton WG, Bessell JR, Millard SH, Baxter PS, Maddern GJ. A randomized controlled trial assessing the benefit of humidified insuffla tion gas during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13:106–8. Crossref PMid:9918607
  • Erol DD, Yilmaz S, Polat C, Arikan Y. Efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Adv Ther. 2008; 25: 45–52. Crossref PMid:18227981
  • Boddy AP, Mehta S, Rhodes M. The effect of intraperitoneal local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Anesth Analg. 2006; 103:682–8. Crossref PMid:16931681
  • Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anesthesia. 2001; 56:1024–6. Crossref
  • Netter FH. Abdomen posterolateral abdominal wall. In Atlas of human anatomy summit. Edited by Netter FH. New Jersey. The Ciba-Geigy Corporation. 1989: 231–40.
  • McDonnell J, O’Donnell, Brian M, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey J. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007; 104:193–7. Crossref .0f PMid:17179269
  • Farooq M, Carey M. A case of liver trauma with a blunt regional anesthesia needle while performing Transversus Abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008; 33:274–5. Crossref PMid:18433683
  • Willschke H, Marhofer P. Ultrasonography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95(2)226–30. Crossref PMid:15923270
  • Walter EJ, Smith P, Albertyn R, Uncles DR. Ultrasound imaging for Transverse Abdominis blocks. Anaesthesia. 2008; 63:211. Crossref PMid:18211466
  • Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007; 35:616–7. PMid:18020088
  • Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, Dahl JB. The Transverse Abdominis plane block: A valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010; 54:529–35. Crossref PMid:20175754
  • Kuthiala G, Chaudhary G. Ropivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and clinical use. Indian J Anesth. 2011; 55(2):104–10. Crossref PMid:21712863 PMCid:PMC3106379
  • Loukes M, Tubbs RS, Sedfi EL. The clinical anatomy of triangle of Petit. Hernia. 2007; 11:441–4. Crossref PMid:17492342
  • Hebbard P. Subcostal TAP block under ultrasonic guidance. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007; 35(4):616–7. PMid:18020088
  • Hebbard P. Subcostal TAP block under ultrasonic guidance. Anesth Analg. 2008; 106:674–5. Crossref PMid:18227342
  • Barrington MJ. Spread of injectate after ultrasonic guidance subcostal block. A cadaveric study. Anesthesia. 2009; 64:745–50. Crossref PMid:19624629
  • El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, et al. Ultrasound-guided Transverse abdominis plane block: Description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102:763–7. Crossref PMid:19376789
  • Ra YS, Kim CH. The analgesic effect of the ultrasound guided Transverse Abdominis plane block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean J Anesth. 2010; 58(4):362–8. Crossref PMid:20508793 PMCid:PMC2876857
  • Jackson SA, Laurence AS, Hill JC. Does post laparoscopic pain relate to residual carbon dioxide? Anesthesia. 1996: 51:485–7. Crossref
  • Aitola P, Airo I, Kaukinen S, Ylitalo P. Comparison of N2O and CO2 pneumoperitoneums during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with special reference to postoperative pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998: 8: 14044. Crossref PMid:9566570
  • Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ. Randomised trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br F Surg. 1997; 84:455–8. Crossref
  • Unbehaun N, Feussner H, Siewert JR, Niederdruck – insuffationstechnik in der laparoskopischen cholezystektomie. Minimal Invasive Chirurgie. 1995; 4:10–5.
  • Korell M, Schmaus F, Strowitzki T, Schneeweiss SG, Hepp. H. Pain intensity following laparoscopy. Surg Laparos Endos 1995; 6: 375-79. Crossref
  • Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, Weerts J, Lamy M. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal Bupivacain. Anesth Analg. 1995; 81:37–84. Crossref
  • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlling trials published in obstetrics and gynaecology journals. JAMA. 1994; 272:125–8. Crossref PMid:8015122
  • Mc Donnell JG, O’Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, Laffey JG. Transverse abdominis plane block: A cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007; 32(5):399–404. Crossref PMid:17961838
  • Mc Donnell JG, O’Donnell. The regional abdominal field infiltration (Rafi) technique. CT and anatomic identification of novel approach to Transverse Abdominis neurovascular fascial plane. Anaesthesiology. 2004; 101:899.
  • Hebbard P, Tran TM. Determination of spread of injectate after ultrasonographic guided transverse abdominis block. A cadaver study. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102:123–7. Crossref PMid:19059922
  • Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ. Ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block for analgesia after caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 103(5):726–30. Crossref PMid:19700776

Abstract Views: 283

PDF Views: 86




  • Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract Views: 283  |  PDF Views: 86

Authors

Gaurav Kuthiala
Department of Anaesthesiology, Satguru Pratap Singh Hospital, Ludhiana, India
Ritul Mehta
Department of Anaesthesiology, Satguru Pratap Singh Hospital, Ludhiana, India
Anupam Shrivastava
Department of Anaesthesiology, Satguru Pratap Singh Hospital, Ludhiana, India
Venus Aggarwal
Department of Anaesthesiology, Satguru Pratap Singh Hospital, Ludhiana, India

Abstract


Background and Aims: Ultrasound Guided (USG) Transverse Abdominis Plane (TAP) block is a relatively new regional analgesic technique for postoperative pain relief after abdominal surgery. However, the efficacy and safety of TAP block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not well established. This prospective, randomized, controlled, double blind study was designed to compare analgesic efficacy of USG guided TAP block over conventional analgesics in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery during post-operative period. Methods: One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised into two groups. Patients in Group A (n = 50) received standard analgesics along with USG guided TAP block after induction of anaesthesia while patients in Group B (n = 50) received only standard analgesics postoperatively as per standard protocols of the institution. USG guided TAP block was given using high frequency linear probe (6-13 MHz) with 'in-plane' technique. Once the tip of the needle was confirmed in the facial plane between the Internal Oblique muscle and Transverse Abdominis muscle, Injection Ropivacaine 0.25%, 30 ml was administered bilaterally. Each patient was monitored in Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Time duration for demanding first dose of opioid, total dose of opioid used, opioid induced and TAP block technique related complications, hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores on rest and coughing at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours were recorded in each patient. At the end of study data was analysed using appropriate statistical tests and value of p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Group A patients had a lesser demand of opioid (mean ± SD) 2.44 ± 2.44 mg as compared to patients in Group B (3.96 ± 2.56 mg)(P<0.01). VAS scores at rest and coughing were (mean ± SE) 1.21 ± 0.07 and 1.43 ± 0.01 in group A and 1.72 ± 0.09 and 2.18 ± 0.18 in Group B (P<0.01). There was no difference in time duration for demanding first dose of opioid by patient postoperatively, hospital stay, and opioid related complications in both groups. There was no TAP block technique related complication seen during study. Patients had better analgesic satisfaction after TAP block. Conclusion: USG guided TAP block is a safe and effective mode of postoperative analgesia in 24 hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords


Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopy, Ultrasound Guided TAP Block.

References