Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Lagrangian Relaxation for the Capacitated Dynamic Lot Sizing Problem


Affiliations
1 University of Houston-Downtown, College of Business, MMBA, Houston, Texas, United States
2 Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, IIT Kanpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In this paper, we consider the capacitated dynamic lot-sizing problem and assume that all conditions of Wagner-Whitin (1958) model apply except the capacity restriction. We give three different formulation of the problem. We relax the capacity constraint and initiate the Lagrangian procedure. At each Lagrangian iteration, we solved the uncapacitated lot-sizing problem by the Wagner-Whitin method that runs in O(n2) time. We compare the quality of bounds so obtained. In particular, we find that the Lagrangian procedure that modified the setup cost turned out to be inferior to the Lagrangian procedure that modified only the holding cost.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size


  • Lagrangian Relaxation for the Capacitated Dynamic Lot Sizing Problem

Abstract Views: 373  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Omprakash K. Gupta
University of Houston-Downtown, College of Business, MMBA, Houston, Texas, United States
Syed Ali
Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, IIT Kanpur, India
R. R. K. Sharma
Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, IIT Kanpur, India

Abstract


In this paper, we consider the capacitated dynamic lot-sizing problem and assume that all conditions of Wagner-Whitin (1958) model apply except the capacity restriction. We give three different formulation of the problem. We relax the capacity constraint and initiate the Lagrangian procedure. At each Lagrangian iteration, we solved the uncapacitated lot-sizing problem by the Wagner-Whitin method that runs in O(n2) time. We compare the quality of bounds so obtained. In particular, we find that the Lagrangian procedure that modified the setup cost turned out to be inferior to the Lagrangian procedure that modified only the holding cost.

References