Optimization: Journal of Research in Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Anthropological Approach to Understanding the ‘Social’ in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of Developing Countries


Affiliations
1 Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the current corporate scenario, Organisations are facing new community and ecological challenges to their dealing from issues about labor production to community conflict, climate change, or exhausted markets. As an answer to these issues, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) movement has emerged and established an authority to offer itself as a solution. Over the past decade, as Corporate Social Responsibility has entwined within the network of ethical standards and has become recognized as accepted view within the arena of both development and multinational business. These two domains are the concerns around which the discussion in this paper is restricted. As a result, this study, through the use of anthropology, have begun analysing how social and material “responsibility” is grounded in the normal functioning of organizations. Here the anthropological studies apply ethnographic lens on CSR’s functioning from two stand points; on the one hand, focusing on the CSR machinery and on the other hand, exploring CSR’s local impacts through the anthropological study of corporate social responsibility in a respective geographical area. The aim of this paper is to bring together many of the key issues involved in the functionality domain of CSR while tracking the processes and outcomes of CSR ethnographically in diverse contexts.

Keywords

CSR, Anthropology, Developing Countries, Ethnography of CSR.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • • Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical sociology, 34(1), 51-79.

  • • Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Editorial Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world. International affairs, 81(3), 499-513.

  • • Blowfield, M., & Dolan, C. S. (2014). Business as a development agent: evidence of possibility and improbability. Third World Quarterly, 35(1), 22-42.

  • • Cross, J., & Street, A. (2009). Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid. Anthropology Today, 25(4), 4-9.

  • • Cross, J. (2014). The coming of the corporate gift. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(2-3), 121-145.

  • • The Coca-Cola Company, ‘The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report’, 2012, p. 21.

  • • European Commission, Insead, BS, C., BS, B., Impact, & Academy, L. K. 2006. Understanding and Responding to Societal Demands on Corporate Responsibiliy. In M. Zollo (Ed.).

  • • Gardner, K. (2012). Discordant development: Global capitalism and the struggle for connection in Bangladesh. Pluto Press.

  • • IMF. 2006.World Economic Outlook: Financial Systems and Economic Cycles. Brussels: International Monetary Fund.

  • • Prahalad, C. K. (2009). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, revised and updated 5th anniversary edition: Eradicating poverty through profits. FT Press.

  • • Newell, P., & Muro, A. (2006). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Argentina. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24(December), 49-68.

  • • Rajak, D. (2011). In good company: An anatomy of corporate social responsibility. Stanford University Press.

  • • Rankin, K. N. (2001). Governing development: neoliberalism, microcredit, and rational economic woman. Economy and society, 30(1), 18-37.

  • • Reed, D. (2002). Employing normative stakeholder theory in developing countries: A critical theory perspective. Business & Society, 41(2), 166-207.

  • • Allen, A. L., & Regan, M. C. (Eds.). (1998). Debating democracy’s discontent: Essays on American politics, law, and public philosophy. OUP Oxford.

  • • Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • • Shamir, R. (2004). The de-radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30(3), 669-689.

  • • Watkins, K. (2006). Human Development Report 2006-Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis.

  • • Visser, W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility.

  • • Williams, C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in a comparative perspective.

  • • World Resources Institute. (2005). World Resources: The Wealth Of The Poor: Managing Ecosystems To Fight Poverty. World Resources Institute

  • • Mundial, B. (2006). World Development Report 2007: Development and the next generation. World Bank.


Abstract Views: 378

PDF Views: 0




  • An Anthropological Approach to Understanding the ‘Social’ in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of Developing Countries

Abstract Views: 378  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rubina Nusrat
Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
N. U. Khan
Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India

Abstract


In the current corporate scenario, Organisations are facing new community and ecological challenges to their dealing from issues about labor production to community conflict, climate change, or exhausted markets. As an answer to these issues, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) movement has emerged and established an authority to offer itself as a solution. Over the past decade, as Corporate Social Responsibility has entwined within the network of ethical standards and has become recognized as accepted view within the arena of both development and multinational business. These two domains are the concerns around which the discussion in this paper is restricted. As a result, this study, through the use of anthropology, have begun analysing how social and material “responsibility” is grounded in the normal functioning of organizations. Here the anthropological studies apply ethnographic lens on CSR’s functioning from two stand points; on the one hand, focusing on the CSR machinery and on the other hand, exploring CSR’s local impacts through the anthropological study of corporate social responsibility in a respective geographical area. The aim of this paper is to bring together many of the key issues involved in the functionality domain of CSR while tracking the processes and outcomes of CSR ethnographically in diverse contexts.

Keywords


CSR, Anthropology, Developing Countries, Ethnography of CSR.

References