Oriental Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study and Comparison of Integrated Circuits in Digital and Analog Form of Present Day Technology – Review


Affiliations
1 Soe Vistas Chennai, India
 

Fifty years ago instrumentation and control (I&C) systems at nuclear power plants (NPP) were analog and relied on a mixture of mechanical, pneumatic and electric components. Today analog technology has been replaced with digital technology. Digital I&C has over the years experienced difficulties in the licensing process, which has delayed and escalated costs of both NPP and I&C projects. In the paper it is argued that some of the difficulties are connected to misunderstandings regarding differences between analog and digital I&C. These misunderstandings have led to unrealistic expectations regarding proofs that selected I&C systems can be considered acceptable. To ensure a successful licensing process it would be necessary to agree on evidence for safety that can be considered sufficient. Such evidence should be collected both from the I&C design process and from testing intermediate and final I&C solutions. By a combination of evidence from different sources it should be possible to build a safety case that can be agreed to give sufficient proofs for acceptability. The first component in building the safety case is to make use of safety principles to provide structural evidence that certain classes of design errors have been avoided. The second component is to use simulators and targeted testing to demonstrate functionality of the I&C in different plant situations.

Keywords

Analog, Digital, I&C Functions, Safety Principles, Verification and Validation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • B. Wahlström, Safety principles in I&C design, NPIC & HMIT 2015, Charlotte NC,2015.

  • IAEA, Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control: A Guidebook, TRS239,1984.

  • L. Bainbridge. Ironies of Automation, Automatica.1983;19:775-779.

  • R.C. Conant, W.R. Ashby. Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. Int. J. Systems Sci.1970;1:89-97.

  • B. Wahlström, C. Rollenhagen. Safety management – a multi-level control problem. Safety Science.2014;69:3–17.

  • B. Wahlström, A. Duchac. IAEA safety principles applied to NPP instrumentation and control, NPIC & HMIT 2015, Charlotte, NC, 2015.

  • O. Bäckström, J.-E. Holmberg, M. Jockenhövel-Barttfeld, M. Porthin, A. Taurines. Software reliability analysis for PSA, NKS-304, Nordic Nuclear Safety Research, 2014.

  • J. Valkonen, I. Karanta, M. Koskimies, K. Heljanko, I. Niemelä, D. Sheridan, R.E. Bloomfield. NPP Safety Automation Systems Analysis State of the Art, VTT Working Papers 94;2008. 10(10)

  • C. Larman, Applying UML and patterns; an introduction to object-oriented analysis and design and iterative development, Prentice Hall.2005.

  • J. Lahtinen, J. Valkonen, K. Björkman, J. Frits, I. Niemelä, K. Heljanko. Model checking of safety-critical software in the nuclear engineering domain. Reliability Engineering & System Safety.2012;105:104-113.

  • Jussi Lahtinen. Hardware failure modelling methodology for model checking, VTT-R-00213-14.2014.

  • EPRI, Operating Experience Insights on Common-Cause Failures in Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems, Report 1016731 (2008).

  • IAEA, Protecting against Common Cause Failures in Digital I&C Systems of Nuclear Power Plants, NP-T-1.5, 2009.

  • P. Savioja, Evaluating systems usability in complex work; development of a systemic usability concept to benefit control room design, VTT Science 57, 2014.

  • Licensing of safety critical software for nuclear reactors – Common position of seven European nuclear regulators and authorised technical support organisations, BEL V, BfS, CSN, ISTec, ONR, SSM, STUK, http://www.onr.org.uk/software.pdf. 2013.

  • CHANG, J., CHEN, Y., CHAN, W., et. al., A 7nm 256Mb SRAM in high-k metal-gate fin FET technology with write-assist circuitry for low-VMIN applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. 2017, p. 206–208. DOI: 10.1109/ISSCC.2017.7870333.

  • RAKUS, M., STOPJAKOVA, V., ARBET, D. Analysis of bulk-driven technique for low-voltage IC design in 130 nm CMOS technology. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). 2017, p. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICETA.2017.8102522

  • GODOY, P., DAWSON, J. L. Chopper stabilization of analog multipliers, variable gain amplifiers, and mixers. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 2018; 43(10):2311–2321. DOI: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2004328

  • SOVCIK, M., KOVAC, M., ARBET, D., et al. Ultra-low-voltage boosted driver for self-powered systems. Microelectronics Reliability.2018;80:155–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2017.11.006

  • ARBET, D., KOVAC, M., NAGY, L.,et al., Low-voltage bulk-driven variable gain amplifier in 130 nm CMOS technology In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits Systems (DDECS). Kosice (Slovakia).2016;1–6. DOI: 10.1109/DDECS.2016.7482439.


Abstract Views: 245

PDF Views: 0




  • Study and Comparison of Integrated Circuits in Digital and Analog Form of Present Day Technology – Review

Abstract Views: 245  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

E. N. Ganesh
Soe Vistas Chennai, India

Abstract


Fifty years ago instrumentation and control (I&C) systems at nuclear power plants (NPP) were analog and relied on a mixture of mechanical, pneumatic and electric components. Today analog technology has been replaced with digital technology. Digital I&C has over the years experienced difficulties in the licensing process, which has delayed and escalated costs of both NPP and I&C projects. In the paper it is argued that some of the difficulties are connected to misunderstandings regarding differences between analog and digital I&C. These misunderstandings have led to unrealistic expectations regarding proofs that selected I&C systems can be considered acceptable. To ensure a successful licensing process it would be necessary to agree on evidence for safety that can be considered sufficient. Such evidence should be collected both from the I&C design process and from testing intermediate and final I&C solutions. By a combination of evidence from different sources it should be possible to build a safety case that can be agreed to give sufficient proofs for acceptability. The first component in building the safety case is to make use of safety principles to provide structural evidence that certain classes of design errors have been avoided. The second component is to use simulators and targeted testing to demonstrate functionality of the I&C in different plant situations.

Keywords


Analog, Digital, I&C Functions, Safety Principles, Verification and Validation.

References