Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Political Leaders & Parties as Brands:A Theoretical Perspective


Affiliations
1 Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
 

Universally, there doesn't exist a predominant perception as to whether political parties or political leaders could be treated as brands on lines with commodities. This paper attempts to theoretically establish a relationship between these two terms, namely brand and political parties or leaders. Further it details the various bases on which consumer-citizens develop an understanding about political brands. It builds upon this to talk about the formation of political brand images in the eyes of consumer-citizens which results from the interactions between the leaders, their parties and the ideologies or policies. Following this, the paper talks about the tentative benefits for the consumer-citizen which might result because of the political branding phenomenon. The consumer-citizen, swayed by the benefits arising out of political brands, gets motivated to know more about it, getting in touch in the process and eventually makes the decision with regard to the same. The modern consumer is at the focal point of this research paper and the choices which s/he has with regard to vouching for a particular political party or leader makes for a compelling case for them being considered on lines with a brand.

Keywords

Political Brand, Political Marketing, Consumer-Citizen, Leader, Party.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • American Marketing Association (AMA) (1960) Marketing Definitions: A Glossary of Marketing Terms. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
  • French, A. and Smith, I.G. (2008) ‘Measuring Political Brand Equity: A Consumer Approach.’ Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Political Marketing, Manchester Business School, March.
  • Henneberg, S.C. (2006) ‘The Views of an Advocatus Dei: Political Marketing and its Critics’, Journal of Public Affairs 4(3): 225–43.
  • Jevons, C. (2006) ‘Universities: a Prime Example of Branding Going Wrong’, Journal of Product and Brand Management 15(7): 466–7.
  • John, D.R., Loken, B., Kim, K. and Monga, A.B. (2006) ‘Brand Concept Maps: A Methodology for Identifying Brand Association Networks’, Journal of Marketing Research 43(4): 549–63.
  • Keller, K.L. and Lehmann, D.R. (2006) ‘Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities’, Marketing Science 25(6): 740–59.
  • Lilleker, D. and Negrine, R. (2003) ‘Not Big Brand Names but Corner Shop: Marketing Politics to a Disengaged Electorate’, Journal of Political Marketing 2(1): 55–75.
  • Needham, C. (2005) ‘Brand Leaders: Clinton, Blair and the Limitations of the Permanent Campaign’, Political Studies 53: 343–61.
  • Newman, B.I. and Sheth, J.N. (1985) ‘A Model of Primary Voter Behaviour’, Journal of Consumer Research 12(2): 178–87.
  • O’Cass, A. and Pecotich, A. (2003) ‘The Dynamics of Voter Behaviour and Influence Processes in Electoral Markets: A Consumer Behaviour Perspective’, Journal of Business Research 58: 406–13.
  • O’Shaughnessy, N.J. and Henneberg, S.C. (2007) ‘The Selling of the President 2004: A Marketing Perspective’, Journal of Public Affairs 7: 249–68.
  • Scammell, M. (1999) ‘Political Marketing: Lessons for Political Science’, Political Studies 47(4): 718–39.
  • Schneider, H. (2004) ‘Branding in Politics – Manifestations, Relevance and Identity-oriented Management’, Journal of Political Marketing 3(3): 41–67.
  • Zinkin, J. (2004) ‘The Roman Catholic Church as a Case Study in Global Branding’, International Journal of Applied Marketing 3(1): 145–67.

Abstract Views: 500

PDF Views: 8




  • Political Leaders & Parties as Brands:A Theoretical Perspective

Abstract Views: 500  |  PDF Views: 8

Authors

Amit Kumar
Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Somesh Dhamija
Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Universally, there doesn't exist a predominant perception as to whether political parties or political leaders could be treated as brands on lines with commodities. This paper attempts to theoretically establish a relationship between these two terms, namely brand and political parties or leaders. Further it details the various bases on which consumer-citizens develop an understanding about political brands. It builds upon this to talk about the formation of political brand images in the eyes of consumer-citizens which results from the interactions between the leaders, their parties and the ideologies or policies. Following this, the paper talks about the tentative benefits for the consumer-citizen which might result because of the political branding phenomenon. The consumer-citizen, swayed by the benefits arising out of political brands, gets motivated to know more about it, getting in touch in the process and eventually makes the decision with regard to the same. The modern consumer is at the focal point of this research paper and the choices which s/he has with regard to vouching for a particular political party or leader makes for a compelling case for them being considered on lines with a brand.

Keywords


Political Brand, Political Marketing, Consumer-Citizen, Leader, Party.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana%2F2017%2Fv13%2Fi1%2F151276