Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impediments to Public-Private Partnership Projects In Aftermath of Covid-19 Pandemic


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara Punjab, India
2 Assistant Professor, Mittal school of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
 

India has enjoyed impressive economic growth over the past two decades. The country possesses the world’s second-largest road system, fourth-largest rail system, and fifth-largest electric power generating manufacturing capability. Despite progress and good prospects for the future, investors continue to face many challenges, which have worsened after Covid-19. Nearly 90% of the world’s population has faced travel restrictions, a sharp decline in the global economy during the Covid-19 pandemic. There had been significant downward trend in the infrastructure investment during Pandemic, keeping in view the slowdown of private investment in infrastructure; the present study was carried out to investigate the complexities in PPP infrastructure projects by looking at the elements that impede the successful implementation of PPP in India. The study relies on primary and secondary data. To better understand the constraints to PPP implementation, a questionnaire survey was performed to collect the viewpoints of partners who have a good grasp of the PPP concept and have worked on PPP projects in India. There was a total of 94 valid submissions. The overall findings show that the top five challenges for speeding PPP in India are ‘Inefficient and inequitable risk allocation in PPPs,’ ‘Over leveraged debt and paucity of equity,’ ‘Weak regulatory and institutional frameworks,’ ‘Delay in issuing clearances by authorities,’ and ‘Land selection and acquisition.

Keywords

Finance, Infrastructure, Projects, Public Private partnerships (PPPs).
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Arndt, R., & Maguire, G. (1999). Private Provision of Public Infrastructure: Risk Identification and Allocation Survey Report. Departament of Treasury and Finance, Melbourne.
  • Ahluwalia, M. S. (2011). Prospects and policy challenges in the twelfth plan. Economic and Political weekly, 88-105.
  • Akintoye, A. (2009). PPPs for Physical Infrastructure in Developing Countries. Finance & Management for Public-Private Partnerships (pp. 123-141).
  • Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J. & Hardcastle C. (2005). “The allocation of risks in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 23, pp. 25 – 35.
  • Cheung, E., Chan, A. P., & Kajewski, S. (2009). Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects: Findings from a survey conducted in Hong Kong and Australia compared to findings from previous research in the UK. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction.
  • Ernst & Young (2006), ‘PPPs in Education’, October, Project Finance Advisory, Australia.
  • Finnerty, J. D., Project Financing: Asset-Based Financial Engineering (New York: Wiley, 1996).
  • Fitzgerald, P. (2004), Review of Partnerships Victoria Provided Infrastructure, Review of Partnerships Victoria, Melbourne
  • Flanagan, R. and Norman, G. (1993) Risk Management and Construction. London: Blackwell.
  • Flyvbjerg, B., M. Holm and S. Buhl (2002), ‘Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects - Error or Lie?’, Journal of the American Planning Association 68(3):279-295.
  • Katz, G. & Smith, S. (2003). “Build-Operate-Transfer: The future of construction?”, Journal of Construction Accounting and Taxation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 36-48.
  • Li, B., Akintoye. A.Edwards, P.J. Hardcastle C. (2005), “The allocation of Risk in PPP/PFI Construction Projects in the UK”, International Journal of Project Management 23 (1), pages: 25-35.
  • Merna and Khu (2003) have also indicated that there are instances where the projects failed to achieve
  • Nataraj, G. (2014). Infrastructure challenges in India: The role of public-private partnerships. Observer Research Foundation.
  • Payson, W. H., & Steckler, S. A. (1992). Expanding airport capacity: getting privatization off the ground(No. Policy Insight No. 141). ^ eCalifornia California: Reason Foundation..
  • Payson, William H., and Steven A. Steckler. 1996. Developing Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure. In Privatizing Transportation Systems, edited by Simon Hakim, Paul Seiderstat, and Gary W Bowman, 33-51. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Planning Commission. (2008). Manual for integrated district planning.
  • Sachs, T., C. Elbing, R. Tiong and H. Alfen (2005), ‘Efficient Assessment of Value for Money (VFM) for Selecting Effective Public Private Partnership (PPP) Solutions - A Comparative
  • Sendt, R. (2006), ‘Public Private Partnerships’, CEDA Lunch, 10 April, The Audit Office of New South Wales. Stone, T. (2006), ‘PFI - Is There a Better Way?’ KPMG Global Infrastructure and Projects Group, London.
  • Shen, L.Y., Platten, A., Dang, X. (2006), “Role of public private partnership to manage risk in public sector project in Hong Kong”, International Journal of Project Management Vol 24, pages: 587-594.
  • Singh, R. (2010). Delays and cost overruns in infrastructure projects: extent, causes and remedies. Economic and Political Weekly, 43-54.
  • Skietrys, E., Raipa, A., & Bartkus, E. V. (2008). Dimensions of the efficiency of public-private partnership. Engineering economics, 58(3).
  • Thomas, A. V., Kalidindi, S. N., & Ananthanarayanan, K. A. B. T. (2003). Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India. Construction management and economics, 21(4), 393-407
  • Thomson, C. (2005), ‘Public-Private Partnerships: Prerequisites for Prime Performance,’ EIB Papers 10(2) : 1 12-129.
  • Wang, W., & Dai, D. (2009, September). Risk allocation mechanism for public-private partnership (PPP) projects. In 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science(pp. 1-4). IEEE.
  • World Bank. (2006). The World Bank Annual Report 2006. The World Bank.
  • World Bank. 1994. Development Report: Infrastructure for development. New York: Oxford University Press.

Abstract Views: 422

PDF Views: 0




  • Impediments to Public-Private Partnership Projects In Aftermath of Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract Views: 422  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mushtaq Ahmad Shah
Assistant Professor, Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara Punjab, India
Atif Ghayas
Assistant Professor, Mittal school of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

Abstract


India has enjoyed impressive economic growth over the past two decades. The country possesses the world’s second-largest road system, fourth-largest rail system, and fifth-largest electric power generating manufacturing capability. Despite progress and good prospects for the future, investors continue to face many challenges, which have worsened after Covid-19. Nearly 90% of the world’s population has faced travel restrictions, a sharp decline in the global economy during the Covid-19 pandemic. There had been significant downward trend in the infrastructure investment during Pandemic, keeping in view the slowdown of private investment in infrastructure; the present study was carried out to investigate the complexities in PPP infrastructure projects by looking at the elements that impede the successful implementation of PPP in India. The study relies on primary and secondary data. To better understand the constraints to PPP implementation, a questionnaire survey was performed to collect the viewpoints of partners who have a good grasp of the PPP concept and have worked on PPP projects in India. There was a total of 94 valid submissions. The overall findings show that the top five challenges for speeding PPP in India are ‘Inefficient and inequitable risk allocation in PPPs,’ ‘Over leveraged debt and paucity of equity,’ ‘Weak regulatory and institutional frameworks,’ ‘Delay in issuing clearances by authorities,’ and ‘Land selection and acquisition.

Keywords


Finance, Infrastructure, Projects, Public Private partnerships (PPPs).

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana%2F2022%2Fv18%2Fi1%2F212347