Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Does the Weavers’ Cooperative Society Yield Higher Income to the Handloom Weavers? Evidence from Odisha


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur-303007, Rajasthan, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur-610005, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Professor, Department of Economics, School of Management, Pondicherry University, Kalapet-605014, Puducherry, India
 

The study aims to analyse whether the Weavers’ Cooperative Society (WCS) fetches higher income for the weavers as compared to the other two systems of production-marketing such as independent weavers and working under a Master Weaver (MW)/Middleman (MM). It also seeks to examine the social and demographic factors that influence the handloom weavers to join a cooperative society in Odisha. Primary data collected from 435 handloom weaving households shows that the master weaver system of production-marketing is dominant in the study area. The results of one-way ANOVA revealed that the independent weavers earn the highest income, whereas the weavers working under MW/MM receive the lowest. Though the WCS, in comparison to the master weaver system, yields higher income to the weavers, fewer workers are employed under the cooperative society for various reasons. The results of binary logistic regression analysis tell us that the skill and marital status of the weaver are the significant factors affecting the handloom weavers to work under a WCS. Government policies should aim to strengthen cooperative societies with adequate training facilities to enhance the skill of the handloom weavers.

Keywords

Weavers Cooperative Society, Handloom Weavers, Production- Marketing System, Income Variation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adekunle O.A, Olalekan Ola .T. Ogunrinde R., Odebunm T.(2021). The Role of Cooperative Societies in Advancing Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of International Business and Management 4(6): 01-13.

  • Bhowmik M.R. (2021). SDGs, Social Responsibility, Institutions and Cooperatives: Evidence from the Handloom Weaving Sector in India. International Journal of Rural Management, 17(IS), 97 S-114S.

  • Datta, D.B., & Agrawal, B. (2018). A Study on the Economic Impact of Handloom Cooperatives on Weavers.

  • Dev, S. M., Galab, S., Reddy, P. P., & Vinayan, S. (2008). Economics of handloom weaving: A field study in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 43-51.

  • Dharmaraju, P. (2006, August). Marketing in Handloom Cooperatives. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(31), 3385-3387.

  • Divya C.V., Gopika C.V and Krishna M.B. (2020). Financial Problem Faced by the Handloom Weavers in Chendamangalam Cooperative Society. Easy Chair. Dogarawa, A. B. (2010). The role of cooperative societies in economic development. Available at SSRN 1622149.

  • Ezekiel, P.O. (2014). A Study on Cooperative Societies, Poverty Reduction And Sustainable Development in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16, 132-140.

  • Gertler, M. (2001): Rural Cooperatives and Sustainable Development, Saskatoon SK: Centre for the Study of Cooperatives, University of Saskatchewan.

  • Hussain, M. S. (2014). The role of cooperative organizations in rural community development in Nigeria: Prospects and challenges. Academic Research International, 5(3), 189.

  • ICA (1995). Review of International cooperation. Geneva.

  • Kumudha, A., & Rizwana, M. (2013). Problems Faced by Handloom Industry -

  • A Study with Handloom Weavers. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, 2(3), 50-56.

  • Meher, R. (1995). The Handloom Industry and the Socioeconomic Conditions of Weavers in Orissa. Journal of Rural Development, 14(3), 301 322.

  • Meher, R. (1997). Cooperatives for whom? The Myth and Reality of Cooperativisation of Handloom Sector in Orissa. In B. Misra, Cooperative

  • Movement in India (A Case Study of an Indian State) (pp. 219-230). New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation.

  • Ministry of Textiles, Government of India (2019): “Fourth All India Handloom Census 2019–20,” New Delhi, http://handlooms.nic.in/writereaddata/3736. pdf.

  • Mishra, A. K. (1994). Social impact of handloom cooperatives on weavers in western Orissa-an empirical-study. Journal of Rural Development, 13(2), 259- 267.

  • Mishra, S., & Subudhi, R. N. (2019). The Methodological Domain in Management Research. Methodological Issues in Management Research: Advances, Challenges, and the Way Ahead, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973- 973-220191001

  • Mohanty, A. K., & Acharya, S. C. (2003). Strategy for the Growth and Survival of Small Scale Sector in Orissa: A Case Study of Sambalpuri Bastralaya Handloom Cooperative Society Ltd.(SBHCS Ltd.,) Bargarh. Journal of Rural Development, 22(2), 271-288.

  • Olive Flowrine. P, Mahendran. K, Moghana Lavanya S and Devi H.D (2021). An Empirical Analysis of Constraints Faced by the Handloom Weavers and weaver cooperative Societies in Virudhunagar District in Tamil Nadu. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 40 (45), 34-38.

  • RBCDS (1995): What Are Cooperatives? Washington: Cooperative Information Report.

  • Somavia, J. (2002): ILO Recommendations No 193 on Cooperatives, at www.ica. coop/europe/ra2002/speech.

  • Taimni, K.K. (1997): Cooperatives in the New Environments: A study of the Role of the Registrar of Cooperative Societies in Selected Countries in Asia, Rome: FAOUN.

  • Yamane, Taro (1967): Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd ed, New York: Harper and Row.


Abstract Views: 102

PDF Views: 0




  • Does the Weavers’ Cooperative Society Yield Higher Income to the Handloom Weavers? Evidence from Odisha

Abstract Views: 102  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ashish Kumar Meher
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur-303007, Rajasthan, India
T. K. Venkatachalapathy
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur-610005, Tamil Nadu, India
Prasant Kumar Panda
Professor, Department of Economics, School of Management, Pondicherry University, Kalapet-605014, Puducherry, India

Abstract


The study aims to analyse whether the Weavers’ Cooperative Society (WCS) fetches higher income for the weavers as compared to the other two systems of production-marketing such as independent weavers and working under a Master Weaver (MW)/Middleman (MM). It also seeks to examine the social and demographic factors that influence the handloom weavers to join a cooperative society in Odisha. Primary data collected from 435 handloom weaving households shows that the master weaver system of production-marketing is dominant in the study area. The results of one-way ANOVA revealed that the independent weavers earn the highest income, whereas the weavers working under MW/MM receive the lowest. Though the WCS, in comparison to the master weaver system, yields higher income to the weavers, fewer workers are employed under the cooperative society for various reasons. The results of binary logistic regression analysis tell us that the skill and marital status of the weaver are the significant factors affecting the handloom weavers to work under a WCS. Government policies should aim to strengthen cooperative societies with adequate training facilities to enhance the skill of the handloom weavers.

Keywords


Weavers Cooperative Society, Handloom Weavers, Production- Marketing System, Income Variation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana%2F2023%2Fv19%2Fi2%2F223466