Records of the Zoological Survey of India - A Journal of Indian Zoology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Zooplankton Diversity and Physicochemical Profile of Ameenpur Tank, Telangana, India


Affiliations
1 Freshwater Biology Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Hyderabad-500048, India
2 Department of Zoology, St. Xavier’s College (Autonomous), Palayamkottai - 627002, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Zooplankton composition and diversity in Ameenpur tank, Telangana, India were investigated during the year 2010-2012. The study reveals the occurrence of 55 species of zooplankton, of which 38 species rotifers, 14 cladocerans and 03 copepods. The population density varied from 195 to 5500Ind./L. The highest density of zooplankton was due to rotifer population. Diversity (H´) ranged from 0.6 to 2.45, evenness (J´) was 0.21 to 0.80 and species richness was 5 to 27. The population abundance because of Brachionus angularis, B. calyciflorus, B. caudatus, B. falcatus and B. rubens, Keratella tropica, Ceriodaphnia cornuta, Moina micrura, Bosmina longirostris, Indialona ganapati and Mesocyclops leuckarti. The significant inter and intra relationship between and within physicochemical and zooplankton indices were noted. Zooplankton diversity and physicochemical parameter reveal the change in the trophic status of Ameenpur tank.

Keywords

Zooplankton, Diversity, Physicochemical, Ameenpur Tank.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • APHA 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste water (16th edition). American Public Health Association, Washington DC, United State of America. pp 1-1268.

  • Blancher, C.E. 1984. Zooplankton-trophic relationship in some north and central Florida lakes. Hydrobiologia, 109: 251-263.

  • Chattopadhyay, C., and Barik, A. 2009. The Composition and Diversity of Net Zooplankton Species in a Tropical Freshwater Lake. Inter. J. Lakes and Rivers, 2(1): 21-30.

  • Dhanapathi, M.V.S.S.S. 2000. Taxonomic notes on the Rotifers. Indian Association of Aquatic Biologists, Hyderabad. pp 1- 178.

  • Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., Kawabata, Z.I., Knowler, D.J., Leveque, C., Naiman, R.J., Prieur-Richared, A., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J., and Sulliva, C.A. 2005. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol. Rev., 81: 163-182.

  • Ferdous, Z., and Muktadir A.K.M. 2009. A Review: Potentiality of Zooplankton as Bioindicator. American J. Appl. Sci., 6(10): 1815-1819.

  • Gliwicz, Z.M. 1969. Studies on the feeding of pelagic zooplankton in lakes with varying trophy. Ekologia Polska, 17: 663-707.

  • Haberman, J and Haldan, M. 2014. Indices of zooplankton community as valuable tools in assessing the trophic satate and water quality of eutrophic lakes: long term study of lake Vortsjarv. J. Limnol., 73(2): 263-273.

  • Hayek, L.C and Buzas, M.A. 1997. Surveying Natural Populations. Columbia University Press, New York. 1-563.

  • Jolliffe, I.T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis, Second Edition. Springer, New York.

  • Jyoti, M.K., and Sehgal, H. 1979. Ecology of rotifers of surinsar, a subtropical, freshwater lake in Jammu (J and K), India. Hydrobiologia, 65(1): 23-32.

  • Kadam, S.D. 1990. Environmental study of lake Rankala, Jaynatinala and lake kotitirth from Kolhapur City. Envi. Ecol., 8: 95-97.

  • Kannan, V., and Job, S.V. 1980. Diurnal depth wise and seasonal changes physicochemical factors in Sathior reservoir. Hydrobiologia, 70: 103-117.

  • Khan, R.A. 1987. Observation on zooplankton composition, abundance and periodicity in two flood plain lakes of the Kashmir, Himalayan valley. Acta Hydroch. Hydrobiol., 15: 167-174.

  • Kiran, B.R., Puttaiah, E.T., and Kamath, D. 2007. Diversity and seasonal fluctuation of zooplankton in fish pond of Bhadra fish farm, Karnataka. Zoos’ print J., 22(12): 2935-2936.

  • Kudari, V.A., Kanamadi, R.D., and Kadadevaru, G.G. 2004. Present status of Naregal tank (district Haver, Karnataka) with reference to water quality, plankton and Wetland birds. Environ. Ecol., 22(1): 182-187.

  • Kudari, V.A., Kanamadi R.D., and Kadadevaru G.G. 2006. Limnological studies of Attiveri and Bachanki reservoir of Uttat Kannada district, Karnataka, India. Ecol. Environ. Cons., 13(1): 1-6.

  • Maier, G. 1998. Copepod communities in lakes of varying trophic degree. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 136(4): 455-465.

  • Manickam, N., Saravana Bhavan, P., Santhanam, P., Muralisankar, T., Srinivasan, V., Radhakrishnan, S., Vijayadevan, K., Chitrarasu, P and Jawahar Ali, A. 2014. Seasonal Variations of Zooplankton Diversity in a Perennial Reservoir at Thoppaiyar, Dharmapuri District, South India. Austin J. Aquac. Mar. Biol., 1(1): 1-7.

  • Michael, R.G. 1966. Diurnal variation in physico-chemical factors and zooplankton in the surface layer of three freshwater fish ponds. Indian J. Fish., 13: 48-82.

  • Michael, R.G., and Sharma, B.K. 1988. Indian Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Cladocera). Published by Director, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta. pp 1-262.

  • Mishra, A., Chakaraborty, S.K., Jaiswar, A.K., Sharma, A.P., Deshmakhe, G., and Mohnm, M. 2010. Plankton diversity in Dhaura and Baigal reservoir of Uttarakhand. Indian J. Fish., 57(3): 19-27.

  • Negi, V., and Pant, M.C. 1983. Analysis of zooplankton community of lake Khurpatal (Kumaun- Himalaya). Trop. Ecol., 24(2): 271-282.

  • Nogueira, M.G. 2001. Zooplankton composition, dominance and abundance as indicators of environmental compartmentalization in Jurumirim Reservoir (Paranapanema River), Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 455: 1-18.

  • Ostoji, A. 2000. Effect of eutrophication on changes in the composition of zooplankton in the Grosnica reservoir (Serbia, Yugoslavia). Hydrobiologia, 436: 171-178.

  • Patalas, K. 1972. Crustacean plankton and the eutrophication of St. Lawrence Great Lakes. J. Fish. Res. Boar. Canada, 30: 519-542.

  • Patil, C.S., and Gouder, B.Y.M. 1985. Ecological study of freshwater Zooplankton of a subtropical pond (Karnataka State, India). Inter. Rev. Hydrobiol. Hydrograph., 70(2): 259–267.

  • Pattnaik, A. K. 2007. Institutional Mechanism for Monitoring and evaluation. Proceedings of Taal 2007: The 12th World Lake Conference, India. pp 17.

  • Plafkin, J.L., Barber, M.T., Poter, K.D., Gross, S.K., and Highes, R.M. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocol for use in streams and rivers for benthic macro invertebrates and Fish. EPA/444/4-89/001. Office of the water regulation and standard. U.S. Environmental protection Agency, Washington DC. USA.

  • Ranga Reddy, Y. 1994. Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae. In: Guides to the identification of microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, Edited by H.J.F. Dumont, SPB Academic Publishing bv. Netherlands. Viii+220.

  • Sampaio, E.V., Rocha, O., Matsumura-Tundisi, T., and Tundisi, J.G. 2002. Composition and abundance of zooplankton in the limonitic zone of seven reservoirs of the Paranapanema River, Brazil. Brazil J. Biol., 62: 325-545.

  • Sanjer, L.R. and Sharma, U.P. 1995: Community structure of plankton in Kawar lake wetland, Begu-sarai, Bihar: II Zooplankton. J. Fresh. Biol., 7: 165–167.

  • Schindler, D.W., and Noven, B. 1971. Vertical distribution and seasonal abundance of zooplankton in two shallow Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Boar. Canada, 28: 245-256.

  • Segers, H. 1995. The Lecanidae (Monogononta). In Nogrady T. (Ed.) Rotifera 2 In: Dumont H.J (Ed.) Guides to the identification of the Continental Waters of the World 6. SPB Academic, The Hague, Netherlands. 226 pp.

  • Shapiro, J. 1970. A statement on Phosphorus. J. Water Poll. Cont. Fed. Washington, 42: 772-775.

  • Sharma, B.K. 1992. Freshwater rotifers (Rotifera: Eurotatoria). In: Fauna of West Bengal. State Fauna Series, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta. 3(13): 1-121.

  • Sharma, B.K. 1996. Biodiversity of freshwater Rotifera in India-A Status Report. Proc. Zool. Soci. Calcutta, 49(2): 73-85.

  • Sharma, B.K., and Dudani, V.K. 1992. Rotifers from some tropical ponds in Bihar: species composition, similarities and trophic indicators. J. Indian Inst. Sci., 72: 121-130.

  • Sharma, S., and Sharma, B.K. 2008. Zooplankton diversity in floodplain lakes of Assam. Rec. zool. Surv. India (Occ. Paper) 290: 1-370.

  • Sharma, B.K., and Sharma, S. 2011. Zooplankton diversity of Loktak lake, Manipur, India. J. Threat. Taxa, 3(5): 1745-1755.

  • Sladecek, V. 1983. Rotifers as indicators of pollution. Hydrobiologia, 100: 169-201.

  • Staub, R., Hofstaler., and Hass I, J. 1970. The effect of industrial effluents of Memphis and shelhy country on primary plankton production. Biosci., 20: 905-912.

  • Uttangi, J.C. 2001. Conservation and management strategy for the water fowls of minor irrigation tank habits and theirimportance as stopover site in Dharwad Dist. In: Hosetti and M. Venkateshwaralu (eds.), Trends in Wild life and Management. Daya publ. House, New Delhi, India. pp 179-221.

  • Welch, P.S. 1948. Limnological Methods. MC Graw Hill. Co., New York, 1-381.

  • Wetzel, R.G. 1992. Clean water: A fading resource. Hydrobiologia, 243/244: 21-30.


Abstract Views: 527

PDF Views: 195




  • Zooplankton Diversity and Physicochemical Profile of Ameenpur Tank, Telangana, India

Abstract Views: 527  |  PDF Views: 195

Authors

M. Karuthapandi
Freshwater Biology Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Hyderabad-500048, India
D. V. Rao
Freshwater Biology Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Hyderabad-500048, India
B. Xavier Innocent
Department of Zoology, St. Xavier’s College (Autonomous), Palayamkottai - 627002, India

Abstract


Zooplankton composition and diversity in Ameenpur tank, Telangana, India were investigated during the year 2010-2012. The study reveals the occurrence of 55 species of zooplankton, of which 38 species rotifers, 14 cladocerans and 03 copepods. The population density varied from 195 to 5500Ind./L. The highest density of zooplankton was due to rotifer population. Diversity (H´) ranged from 0.6 to 2.45, evenness (J´) was 0.21 to 0.80 and species richness was 5 to 27. The population abundance because of Brachionus angularis, B. calyciflorus, B. caudatus, B. falcatus and B. rubens, Keratella tropica, Ceriodaphnia cornuta, Moina micrura, Bosmina longirostris, Indialona ganapati and Mesocyclops leuckarti. The significant inter and intra relationship between and within physicochemical and zooplankton indices were noted. Zooplankton diversity and physicochemical parameter reveal the change in the trophic status of Ameenpur tank.

Keywords


Zooplankton, Diversity, Physicochemical, Ameenpur Tank.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.26515/rzsi.v116i4.142111