Research Journal of Animal Husbandry & Dairy Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Infectious Bursal Disease Standardization and Seroprevalence Study in Ranchi in Poultry


Affiliations
1 Division of Microbiology, Ranchi Veterinary College, Birsa Agricultural University, Kanke, RANCHI (JHARKHAND), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The work was planned to develop diagnostic assay using hyper immune sera and poultry sera with seroprevalence monitoring in Ranchi (Jharkhand). The best result for dot-ELISA was standardized with 1.2 μl of BursaB2K and Gumboro strain, skimmed milk 1.5 per cent+gelatin 0.5 per cent+BSA 1 per cent as blocking solution, sera dilution of 1:10 and 1:500 conjugate dilution. Statistical analyses were showing there is a non-significant difference in results of dot-ELISA and ELISA test to detect specific anti IBDV antibodies. In the present study, dot-ELISA based seroprevalence study of 92 suspected poultry samples in 18 different places of Ranchi in the year 2014-15, revealed IBD antibodies existed in 38.04 per cent with sensitivity and specificity of 67.57 per cent and 81.82 per cent, respectively. Serodiagnosis helps in monitoring immune status of poultry flock in the area for IBD. There was large variation in IBD positive antibodies in different places of Ranchi, ranging between 14.29 per cent to 100 per cent by dot-ELISA. Similar degree of results were observed with two strains of live attenuated IBD antigen i.e. Bursa B2K (invasive intermediate) and Gumboro (intermediate) strain. Statistical analysis revealed non-significant difference between dot - ELISA and ELISA. Dot-ELISA can be taken as promising tool in field.

Keywords

Dot-ELISA, IBD, Seroprevalence, Poultry.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alam, J., Muhammad, F., Siddiqui, M.U., Khan, S.A., Rehmani, S. and Ahmad, A. (2012). Dot-ELISA for Newcastle disease, infectious bursal disease and mycoplasmosis. Pak. J. Zool., 44(5) : 1301-1305.

  • Botus, D., Popa, V., Radulescu, O. and Bucur, J. (2010). Serological data of avian infectious diseases during 2009. Lucrari Stiintifice Medicina Veterinara, 43 (1): 187-196.

  • Burkhardt, E. and Muller, H. (1987). Susceptibility of chicken blood lymphoblasts and monocytes to Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV). Arch. Virol., 94 : 297-303.

  • Chhabra, R., Sharma, M., Kumar, R. and Kalra, S. K. (2004). A study of sero-prevalence of Infectious bursal disease in Himanchal Pradesh. J. Immunol. Immunop., 6(1) : 16-21.

  • Choudhary, U.K., Tiwary, B.K., Prasad, A. and Ganguly, S. (2012). Study on incidence of infectious bursal disease in and around Ranchi. Indian J. Anim. Res., 46 (2) : 156-159.

  • de Paula, M.B.D., Yokosawa, J., Coutinho, M.D.B., Silva, P.L., Ferraz, R.A., Oliveira, T.F.M. and Queiroz, D.A.O. (2004). Identification and molecular characterization of the infectious bursal disease virus from an outbreak in a broiler flock in midwestern Brazil. Brazilian J. Microbiol., 35 : 352-358.

  • Ezeibe, M.C.O., Okoye, J.O.A., Ogunniran, T.M., Okoroafor, O.N., Ezeala, I.E. and Ngene, A.A. (2012). Modification of the passive heamagglutination test for detection of infectious bursal disease virus. Health, 4 (9) : 653-655.

  • Guvenc, T., Haziroglu, R., Yarim, M. and Tunca, R. (2004). Diagnosis of infectious bursal disease by immunoperoxidase technique. Ankara Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 51 : 237-238.

  • Howie, R. and Thorsen, J. (1981). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for infectious bursal disease virus. Can. J. Comp. Med., 45(1) : 51–55.

  • Iqbal, M., Mahboob, K., Zulfiqar, M., Anwar-ul-Flaq, G.N. and Tabassum, R. (2003). Production of hyper immune serum against newcastle disease (NDV) in rabbits. Pak. J. Vet. Res., 1 : 22-25.

  • Islam, M. T., Islam, M.N., Khan, M.Z.I. and Islam, M. A. (2011). Comparison of agar gel immunodiffusion test, immunohistochemsitry and Reverse Transcription - Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus. Bangl. J. Vet. Med., 9 (2): 121-125.

  • Karunakaran, K., Thanappapilldi, M. and Raghavan, N. (1993). Seroprevalence of infectious bursal disease (IBD) in parts of Tamil Nadu, India. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 16(3): 241-4.

  • Lalkhen, A.G. and McCluskey, A. (2008). Clinical tests: sensitivity and Specificity. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, 8(6) : 221-223.

  • Lasher, H.N. and Shane, S.M. (1994). Infectious Bursal Disease. Poult. Sci., 50 (2) : 133-166.

  • Lin, Z., Kato, A., Otaki, Y., Nakamura, T., Sasmaz, E. and Ueda, S. (1993). Sequence comparisons of a highly virulent infectious bursal disease virus prevalent in Japan. Avian Dis., 37 : 315– 323.

  • Lukert, P.D. and Saif, Y.M. (1991).Infectious bursal disease in Diseases of Poultry, 9th Edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, USA.

  • Mahgoub, H.A. (2012). An overview of infectious bursal disease. Arch.Virol., 157 : 2047-2057.

  • Makadiya, N.R., Jhala, M .K., Gaba, A., Joshi, C.G. and Rank, D.N. (2006). Detection of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) from bursal tissue by RTPCR and its comparative efficacy with conventional precipitation assays. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 41(1): 82-84.

  • Manoharan, S., Parthiban, M., Prabhakar, T.G., Ravikumar, G., Koteeswaran, A., Chandran, N.D.J. and Rajavelu, G. (2004).Rapid serological profiling by an Immunocomb-based dot-enzymelinked immunosorbent test for three major poultry diseases. Vet. Res. Commun., 28(4): 339-346.

  • Mor, S.K., Narang, G., Jindal, N., Mahajan, N., Sharma, P. and Rakha, N. (2010). Epidemiological studies on infectious bursal disease in broiler chickens in Haryana, India. Internat. J. Poult.Sci., 9 : 395-400.

  • Nurulfiza, I., Hair-Bejo, M., Omar, A.R. and Aini, I. (2011). Immunochromatographic gold-based test strip for rapid detection of Infectious bursal disease virus antibodies. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 23 : 320–324.

  • Okwor, E.C., Eze, D.C. and Okonkwo, K (2011). Serum antibody levels against infectious bursal disease virus in Nigerian village chickens. Pak. Vet. J., 32 : 286-287.

  • Parthiban, M. and Thiagarajan, V. (2000). Application of polymerase chain reaction for early detection of infectious bursal disease virus infection. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 70(12): 1201-1203.

  • Rakibul Hasan, A. K. M., Ali, M. H., Siddique, M.P., Rahman, M. M. and Islam, M. A. (2010). clinical and laboratory diagnoses of newcastle and infectious bursal diseases of chickens. Bangl.J. Vet. Med., 8(2): 131 – 140.

  • Ramadass, P., Parthiban, M., Thiagarajan, V., Chandrasekar, M., Vidhya, M.N. and Raj, G.D. (2008). Development of single serum dilution ELISA for detection of infectious bursal disease virus antibodies. Vet. Arhiv., 78 (1) : 23-30.

  • Snedcor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (2004). In: Statistical methods, 10th Edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, U.S.

  • Subramanyam, K.V., Purushothaman, V., Manohar, B.M., Ravikumar, G. and Manoharan, S. (2010). Development of dot – enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to infectious bursal disease, hydropericardium syndrome and chicken anaemia viruses. Eur. J. Biol. Sci.,4(1): 08-18.

  • Sultana, J., Hussain, M., Malik, S.A. and Naeem, K. (1999). Use of dot-ELISA for the diagnosis of infectious bursal disease in chickens. Pak. Vet. J., 19(3): 158-160.

  • Swai, E.S., Kessy, M J., Sanka, P.N. and Mtui, P.F. (2011). A serological survey for infectious bursal disease virus antibodies in free-range village chickens in northern Tanzania. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc., 82(1): 32-35.

  • Swain, P., Verma, K.C., Kataria, J. M. and Mohanty, S. K. (1999). Monoclonal antibody based dot-Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Dot-ELISA) and agar gel precipitation test (AGPT) for identification of NDV. Indian J. Experimental Biol., 37(10) : 1037-1038.


Abstract Views: 264

PDF Views: 0




  • Infectious Bursal Disease Standardization and Seroprevalence Study in Ranchi in Poultry

Abstract Views: 264  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anuradha Kumari
Division of Microbiology, Ranchi Veterinary College, Birsa Agricultural University, Kanke, RANCHI (JHARKHAND), India
Andarun Prasad
Division of Microbiology, Ranchi Veterinary College, Birsa Agricultural University, Kanke, RANCHI (JHARKHAND), India

Abstract


The work was planned to develop diagnostic assay using hyper immune sera and poultry sera with seroprevalence monitoring in Ranchi (Jharkhand). The best result for dot-ELISA was standardized with 1.2 μl of BursaB2K and Gumboro strain, skimmed milk 1.5 per cent+gelatin 0.5 per cent+BSA 1 per cent as blocking solution, sera dilution of 1:10 and 1:500 conjugate dilution. Statistical analyses were showing there is a non-significant difference in results of dot-ELISA and ELISA test to detect specific anti IBDV antibodies. In the present study, dot-ELISA based seroprevalence study of 92 suspected poultry samples in 18 different places of Ranchi in the year 2014-15, revealed IBD antibodies existed in 38.04 per cent with sensitivity and specificity of 67.57 per cent and 81.82 per cent, respectively. Serodiagnosis helps in monitoring immune status of poultry flock in the area for IBD. There was large variation in IBD positive antibodies in different places of Ranchi, ranging between 14.29 per cent to 100 per cent by dot-ELISA. Similar degree of results were observed with two strains of live attenuated IBD antigen i.e. Bursa B2K (invasive intermediate) and Gumboro (intermediate) strain. Statistical analysis revealed non-significant difference between dot - ELISA and ELISA. Dot-ELISA can be taken as promising tool in field.

Keywords


Dot-ELISA, IBD, Seroprevalence, Poultry.

References