Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study of Butterfly Diversity and Distribution at Kolkar Science College Campus Indore, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Seed Technology, Govt. Holkar Science College, Indore – 452001, India
2 Department of Botany, Govt. Holkar Science College, Indore – 452001, India
3 Department of Zoology, Govt. Holkar Science College, Indore – 452001, India
 

The photoautotroph’s and the heterotroph’s are associated with each other. The relationship may be either beneficial or determinant to each other. Such one beautiful beneficial relationship exists in nature between plants and butterflies. Flying insect are the most common and colorful component of an ecosystem in general and butterflies in particular. They play a very important in herbivorous food chain/web. The present study was carried out at Holkar Science College Campus Indore District, Madhya Pradesh, India, during 2014 to 2015. A total of 41 butterfly species were recorded. Family Nymphalidae (19) dominates in the study area, followed by Pieridae (08), with minimum members of Hesperiidae (02). Total larval food plants recorded from the campus are 44 belonging to 23 different families. Hygrophylla aericulata ware found most importance larval food plants as they supports the five pansies found here. The ratio of food plants and butterflies is near about 1:1. Plants of the Asteraceae family were more used by butterflies as nectar food plants. These findings are important with respect to butterfly diversity in planning conservation strategies in the area. The very common butterflies are Common jezebel, Common gull, Common emigrant, Mottled emigrant, Common grass yellow, Lime blue, Pale grass blue, Small grass jewel, and common are Lemon pansy, Great egg fly, Danaid egg fly, Plain tiger and among very rare includes Common baron, Common sailor, Chocolate pansy, Grey pansy Spot swordtail, Royal peacock, Commander, and Common wanderer.

Keywords

Butterfly Diversity, Larval Food Plants, Conservation, Asteraceae.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H. (2003). Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos, 102, 417-426.
  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H. (2006). Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodiversity and conservation, 15, 1943-1966.
  • Erhardt A. (1985). Diurnal Lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 22, 849-862.
  • Kremen C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural area monitoring. Ecological Application, 2, 203-17.
  • Kunte K. 2000. Butterflies of Peninsular India. Universities Press (Hyderabad) and India Academy of Science (Bangalore).
  • Pawar K, Alone RK. 2014. Study of Butterflies and their relationship with plants. a research report under the basic research scheme of UGC department of botany govt. holkar science college Indore, 1-60.
  • Pawar K, Prakash MM, DUBY B. 2011. A report on the occurrence of Butterflies in the Central Zone of Indore city. Paper presented in 1st world congress for man and nature global climate change and biodiversity conservation 11 to 13 November 2011, Gurukul kangri vishwavidhyalaya Haridwar India, 419.
  • Pollard E. 1991. Monitoring Butterfly Numbers; in Monitoring for Conservation and Ecology (ed.). F.B. Goldsmith (London: Chapman and Hall):87.
  • Sharma S, Mandloi R, Chariya D. 2013. Diversity of Butterflies in Omkareshwar region nearby area of Narmada river bank, Madhya Pradesh India. International Journal of Life Sciences, 3,2014. 144-148
  • Tiple AD, Deshmukh VP, Dennis RLH. 2006. Factors influencing nectar plant resource visits by butterflies on a university compus: implications for conservation. Nota lipid, 28, 213-224.
  • Tiple AD, Khurad AM, Dennis RLH. 2007. Butterfly diversity in relation to a huma-impact gradient on a Indian university campus. Nota Lepid, 30, 179-188.
  • Wynter-Blyth MA. 1957. Butterflies of the Indian Region. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, 523.

Abstract Views: 622

PDF Views: 8




  • A Study of Butterfly Diversity and Distribution at Kolkar Science College Campus Indore, India

Abstract Views: 622  |  PDF Views: 8

Authors

K. Pawar
Department of Seed Technology, Govt. Holkar Science College, Indore – 452001, India
R. K. Alone
Department of Botany, Govt. Holkar Science College, Indore – 452001, India
M. M. Prakash
Department of Zoology, Govt. Holkar Science College, Indore – 452001, India

Abstract


The photoautotroph’s and the heterotroph’s are associated with each other. The relationship may be either beneficial or determinant to each other. Such one beautiful beneficial relationship exists in nature between plants and butterflies. Flying insect are the most common and colorful component of an ecosystem in general and butterflies in particular. They play a very important in herbivorous food chain/web. The present study was carried out at Holkar Science College Campus Indore District, Madhya Pradesh, India, during 2014 to 2015. A total of 41 butterfly species were recorded. Family Nymphalidae (19) dominates in the study area, followed by Pieridae (08), with minimum members of Hesperiidae (02). Total larval food plants recorded from the campus are 44 belonging to 23 different families. Hygrophylla aericulata ware found most importance larval food plants as they supports the five pansies found here. The ratio of food plants and butterflies is near about 1:1. Plants of the Asteraceae family were more used by butterflies as nectar food plants. These findings are important with respect to butterfly diversity in planning conservation strategies in the area. The very common butterflies are Common jezebel, Common gull, Common emigrant, Mottled emigrant, Common grass yellow, Lime blue, Pale grass blue, Small grass jewel, and common are Lemon pansy, Great egg fly, Danaid egg fly, Plain tiger and among very rare includes Common baron, Common sailor, Chocolate pansy, Grey pansy Spot swordtail, Royal peacock, Commander, and Common wanderer.

Keywords


Butterfly Diversity, Larval Food Plants, Conservation, Asteraceae.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.22205/sijbs%2F2017%2Fv3%2Fi1%2F110355