Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Speaker’s Expression of ‘Self’:Discourse of Physically Disabled Student in Academic Setting


Affiliations
1 Islamia College, University Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
2 National University of Modern Languages, Peshawar Campus, Pakistan
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The way we perceive and present ourselves is the foundation of our social construction; an individual or group relationship. A particular discourse stems from the social or cultural background, power or social status and can be the best means to open an avenue to peep into individual’s sense of self and identity. To be healthy in itself becomes identity when one compares oneself with unhealthy ones; grounding on this assumption, this paper critically examines the discourse of physically disabled student aiming to discuss the realization of his identity and impression of self as expressed through words. I applied Goffman’s model as a comprehensive approach to analyze the data to understand the role of health in identity formation. While identity and self will be used largely as synonyms, the attempt is made to analyze the respondent’s perception of his self and identity as a social construction. The findings examined within the context of ideological and cultural background and interpreted in the light of Althusser’s (1971) ideological framework. The paper concludes by stating that identity is the product of social relationships implicitly formed in the ideological background and is a source of motivation and expectations to transform one into social being capable of expressive control.

Keywords

Identity, Power, Self, Ideology, Discourse.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Ann Arbor, Mich: Ardis.
  • Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.
  • Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Pelican.
  • Goffman, E. (1969). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
  • Hecht, M. L., & Choi, H. (2012). Health Communication Message Design Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Prude University, USA: SAGE publications.
  • Louis, A., Brewster, O. E. B., & trans, (1971). Lenin and philosophy. New York: Monthly review Press.
  • Marcia, J. (1980). Identity in Adolescence, in Handbook of Adolescent. New York: Joseph Adelson Wiley.
  • Manning, P. (1992). Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology. London: Polity Press.
  • Stavrakakis, Y. (1999). Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.
  • VandenBos Gary R, (2006). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Abstract Views: 213

PDF Views: 1




  • Speaker’s Expression of ‘Self’:Discourse of Physically Disabled Student in Academic Setting

Abstract Views: 213  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Mehnaz Khan
Islamia College, University Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
Hasnain Mashood Ali
National University of Modern Languages, Peshawar Campus, Pakistan

Abstract


The way we perceive and present ourselves is the foundation of our social construction; an individual or group relationship. A particular discourse stems from the social or cultural background, power or social status and can be the best means to open an avenue to peep into individual’s sense of self and identity. To be healthy in itself becomes identity when one compares oneself with unhealthy ones; grounding on this assumption, this paper critically examines the discourse of physically disabled student aiming to discuss the realization of his identity and impression of self as expressed through words. I applied Goffman’s model as a comprehensive approach to analyze the data to understand the role of health in identity formation. While identity and self will be used largely as synonyms, the attempt is made to analyze the respondent’s perception of his self and identity as a social construction. The findings examined within the context of ideological and cultural background and interpreted in the light of Althusser’s (1971) ideological framework. The paper concludes by stating that identity is the product of social relationships implicitly formed in the ideological background and is a source of motivation and expectations to transform one into social being capable of expressive control.

Keywords


Identity, Power, Self, Ideology, Discourse.

References