We'Ken- International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Concept Note on Execution and Impact of Agile Software Project Management Methods in Midsized it Product Development Companies


Affiliations
1 D Y Patil School of Management, Pune, India
2 Persistent Systems Ltd. in Pune, India
 

Agile methods are very helpful in cost effective development of software, it will greatly benefit the organizations in IT field. Empirical data comparing the effectiveness and limitations of agile and non-agile approaches would greatly enhance our understanding of the true benefits and limitations of agile processes. In this study we will be analyzing traditional development methods its disadvantages and agile software development methods with its advantages' This research study will be helpful to IT companies for proper implementation of agile software methods and for maximization of profits while minimizing the cost and delivery time.

Keywords

Project Management, Agile Software, Methods of Software Project Development.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.agiledevelopmentconference.c om/2003/files/AlanAgileSoftwareJun03.ppt

  • Abrahamsson, P. S. (2002). Agile Software Development methods:Review and Analysis . Espoo, Finland: VT Publications

  • Agile Alliance. Manifesto for Agile Software Development . (2009, March 16). Retrieved from http://www.agilemanifesto.org

  • Agile Modeling Home Page. Effictive Practices for Modeling and Documentation. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.agilemodeling.com.

  • Agile_software_development. (n.d.). Retrieved fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software _development

  • Ambler, S. ,. (2002,2003). Agile Modeling, Agile database techniques:Effective strategies for the agile software developer. New York: Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing Inc.

  • Auer, K. ,. (n.d.). XP Applied(The XP Series). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

  • Beck, K. B. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Retrieved from http://agilemanifesto.org/.

  • Beck, K. C. (2000,2003,2004). Extreme Programming explained.Reading, MA:Addison Wesley, Test driven development:By example. Reading:Addison

  • Wesley,Extreme programming explained: Embrace change(2nd Ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.

  • Burton, D. H. (2010). Considerations for Using Agile in DoD Acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/10tn002.pdf

  • C Schwaber, R. F. (2005). Corporate IT leads the second wave of agile adoption. Forrester Research, Inc.

  • Explore the Top 4 Project Management Methodologies. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.devx.com/enterprise/explore-the-top4-project-management-methodologies.html

  • Fowler, M. (n.d.). New methodology. Retrieved fromhttp://www.martinfowler.com/articles/newMe thodology.html

  • Frank Maurer, S. M. On the Productivity of Agile Software Practices: An Industrial Case Study, University of Calgary,. Canada: Department of Computer Science, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4, {Maurer, smartel}@cpsc.ucalgary.ca.

  • Gabriela Robiolo, D. G. (2014). Do Agile Methods Increase Productivity and Quality? . American Journal of Software Engineering and Applications. Vol. 3, No. 1 doi: 10.11648/j.ajsea.20140301.11, pp. 1-11.

  • GUSTAFSSON, J. Model of Agile Software Measurement: A Case Study.

  • J. Erickson, K. L. (2005). Agile Modeling, Agile Software Development, and Extreme Programming: The State of Research. . Journal of Database Management, 16(4), 88-100.

  • Jensen, R. W. (n.d.). Improving Software Development Productivity, Effective Leadership and Quantitative Methods in Software Management.

  • Jim, H. (2002). Agile Software Development ecosystems.Boston,. MA Pearson Education .

  • K. Beck, C. A. (2004). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2nd Edition), Addison-Wesley, Boston.

  • Larson, E. P. (2001). Preparing the U.S. Army for Homeland Security: Concepts, Issues, and Options. RAND Corporation,Issue 1251 .

  • MacCormack, A. (n.d.). Agile software development: Evidence from the field.

  • Manifesto for Agile software development. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://agilealliance.com

  • Pekka Abrahamsson, O. S. (n.d.). Agile Software Development methods-Review and analysis.

  • Scrum Is an Innovative Approach to Getting Work Done. The SCRUM Alliance. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.scrumalliance.org/pages/what_is_scru m.

  • Turk, D. F. (2002). Agile Software Processes: Principles, Assumptions and Limitations. Technical Report. Colorado State University.

  • Turk, R. F. ( 2002). Limitations of agile software processes. The Third International Conference on Extreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering.

  • Types of Agile Methodologies,. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.versionone.com/agile-101/agilemethodologies


Abstract Views: 308

PDF Views: 101




  • A Concept Note on Execution and Impact of Agile Software Project Management Methods in Midsized it Product Development Companies

Abstract Views: 308  |  PDF Views: 101

Authors

Mayanka Sharma
D Y Patil School of Management, Pune, India
Iqbal Kotwal
Persistent Systems Ltd. in Pune, India

Abstract


Agile methods are very helpful in cost effective development of software, it will greatly benefit the organizations in IT field. Empirical data comparing the effectiveness and limitations of agile and non-agile approaches would greatly enhance our understanding of the true benefits and limitations of agile processes. In this study we will be analyzing traditional development methods its disadvantages and agile software development methods with its advantages' This research study will be helpful to IT companies for proper implementation of agile software methods and for maximization of profits while minimizing the cost and delivery time.

Keywords


Project Management, Agile Software, Methods of Software Project Development.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21904/weken%2F2016%2Fv1%2Fi3%2F103459