Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Economic Analysis of Production and Marketing of Chilli in Mokokchung District of Nagaland


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Jubilee Memorial College, Near New Market, Salangtem Ward, P.O Mokokchung-798 601, Nagaland, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Nagaland University, Lumami -798 627, Nagaland, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study was based on information collected from 50 chilli growers, 12 retailers, and eight wholesalers from the Mokokchung district of Nagaland in the crop year 2012-13 through a pre-tested well designed questionnaire. Purposively, the paper intended to discover the surplus, cost, margin, and price spread of chilli production and marketing in Longsa village. The study revealed that after holding 9.5% for domestic purpose, producers were left with 90.5% as marketable surplus of which the actual marketed surplus was 86.33% due to 4.17% loss in spoilage and wastage. Regression coefficient with and without the dummy factor showed that area and production were two major determinants having a positive impact on marketed surplus at the 1% probability level of significance. Furthermore, it was observed that a majority of the farmer-producers (52.3%) sold their produce to retailers, that is, channel - II, indicating the most prominent channel. The net price received by producers in consumer's rupee in channel - I was 97.63%, channel - II: 82.43%, and channel - III: 61.9%, signifying that the producer-consumer channel was the highest marketing efficiency channel according to Shepherd's and Acharya-Agarwal's methods. It further concluded that 93% of chilli was traded in the market by way of retailers and wholesalers, and only 7% within the village.

Keywords

Production, Marketed Surplus, Cost, Margin, Price Spread, Efficiency, Constraints

C81, C87, D24, M31, Q12, Q13, Y10

Paper Submission Date : September 15, 2015 ; Paper sent back for Revision : January 4, 2016 ; Paper Acceptance Date : January 18, 2016.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 358

PDF Views: 0




  • An Economic Analysis of Production and Marketing of Chilli in Mokokchung District of Nagaland

Abstract Views: 358  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sashimatsung
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Jubilee Memorial College, Near New Market, Salangtem Ward, P.O Mokokchung-798 601, Nagaland, India
Giribabu M.
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Nagaland University, Lumami -798 627, Nagaland, India

Abstract


The present study was based on information collected from 50 chilli growers, 12 retailers, and eight wholesalers from the Mokokchung district of Nagaland in the crop year 2012-13 through a pre-tested well designed questionnaire. Purposively, the paper intended to discover the surplus, cost, margin, and price spread of chilli production and marketing in Longsa village. The study revealed that after holding 9.5% for domestic purpose, producers were left with 90.5% as marketable surplus of which the actual marketed surplus was 86.33% due to 4.17% loss in spoilage and wastage. Regression coefficient with and without the dummy factor showed that area and production were two major determinants having a positive impact on marketed surplus at the 1% probability level of significance. Furthermore, it was observed that a majority of the farmer-producers (52.3%) sold their produce to retailers, that is, channel - II, indicating the most prominent channel. The net price received by producers in consumer's rupee in channel - I was 97.63%, channel - II: 82.43%, and channel - III: 61.9%, signifying that the producer-consumer channel was the highest marketing efficiency channel according to Shepherd's and Acharya-Agarwal's methods. It further concluded that 93% of chilli was traded in the market by way of retailers and wholesalers, and only 7% within the village.

Keywords


Production, Marketed Surplus, Cost, Margin, Price Spread, Efficiency, Constraints

C81, C87, D24, M31, Q12, Q13, Y10

Paper Submission Date : September 15, 2015 ; Paper sent back for Revision : January 4, 2016 ; Paper Acceptance Date : January 18, 2016.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer%2F2016%2Fv5i1%2F87841