Arthshastra Indian Journal of Economics & Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Looking Back at the Nehru - Mahalanabis Strategy : A Discourse Analysis


Affiliations
1 Ph.D. Scholar, Economics Department, University of Calcutta. 56, B.T. Road, Kolkata - 700 050., India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper discussed the constitutive relations between the Nehru-Mahalanabis strategy and the discourse of planning that had characterized Indian economic policy-making over 40 years after independence in their continuities and discontinuities of interaction. It understood and analyzed the theoretical underpinnings behind the heavy-scale industrialization policy through public investment (under export pessimism) in reflection of the predominant discourse of development that the third world subscribed to at that period — that of central-planning led capitalist accumulation. Rather than engaging in the multiple debates that had raged the political-economic policy-making of the post-reforms period, like that of agriculture vs. industry, state planning vs. market motive, growth vs. equity, etc., it cut through the analysis by the discourse method, which identified the particular way of knowing the reality – how the discourse produced and disseminated effects of truth, and brought players (e.g., the State) to act and intervene, thereby securing the legitimacy and power of the representation, or the regime of truth of the discourse.

Keywords

Heavy-Scale Industrialization, Public Sector Investment, Export Pessimism, Planning As Discourse, Discourse As Hegemonic

JELClassification Codes : B1, O2, P1, Z1

Paper Submission Date : September 9, 2022 ; Paper sent back for Revision : November 25, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : November 30, 2022

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ahluwalia, D. (1993). Public distribution of food in India: Coverage, targeting and leakages. Food Policy, 18(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(93)90095-s

  • Balasubramanyam, V. N. (2010). Nehruvian legacy for the Indian economy. The Indian Economic Journal, 58(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019466220100103

  • Bardhan, P. K. (1984). Land, labor and rural poverty: Essays in development economics. Columbia University Press and Oxford University Press.

  • Bardhan, P. K. (1985). The political economy of development in India. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Bhagwati, J. N., & Desai, P. (1970). India: Planning for industrialisation. Oxford University Press.

  • Chakravarty, S. (1987). Development planning: The Indian Experience. Oxford University Press.

  • Chancel, L., & Piketty, T. (2019). Indian income inequality, 1922‐2015: From British Raj to billionaire Raj? The Review of Income and Wealth, 65(S1), S33–S62. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12439

  • Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton University Press.

  • Chattopadhyay, S. (1973). On the class nature of land reforms in India since independence. Social Scientist, 2(4), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/3516359

  • Chaudhuri, P. (1993). Changing perceptions to poverty in India: State and poverty. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B (1960–2002), 55(3), 310–321. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25052800

  • Dantwala, M. L. (1993). Agricultural policy: Prices and public distribution system: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48(2), 173–186.

  • Desai, M. (1998). Development perspectives: Was there an alternative to Mahalanobis? In I. J. Ahluwalia and IMD (eds.), India's economic reforms and development: Essays for Manmohan Singh. Oxford University Press.

  • Desai, M. (2007). Our economic growth: 1947–2007. Indian International Centre Quarterly, 33(3/4), 34–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23006067

  • Dreze, J. & Sen, A. (1989). Hunger and public action. Clarendon Press.

  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.

  • Foucault, M. (1972). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.

  • Foucault, M. (2001). The order of things. (2nd ed.). Routledge.

  • George, P. S. (1996). Public distribution system, food subsidy and production incentives. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(39), A140–A144. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4404627

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.

  • Joshi P.C. (1979). Dimensions of agricultural planning: Reflections on the Mahalanobis approach. Man and Development, 4, 9–31.

  • Karmakar A. K. (2012). Development planning & policies under Mahalanobis strategy: A tale of India's dilemma. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), 2(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v2i2.197

  • Krishna R. (1982). Assessing India's economic development. Mainstream, October 25.

  • Laclau E. & Mouffe C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Verso.

  • Lewis W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x

  • Mahalanobis P. C. (1955). The approach of operational research to planning in India. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics (1933–1960), 16(1/2), 3–130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25048270

  • Malamasuri K. Soumya B. Prashant P. & Malve S. (2013). Ahistorical prospective for minimum support price of agricultural crops. Kisan World, 40(12), 46–48.

  • Mooij J. E. (1994). Public distribution system as safety net: Who is saved? Economic and Political Weekly, 29(3), 119–126. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4400665

  • Nurkse R. (1953). Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. Oxford University Press.

  • Patnaik P.(2015).The Nehru–Mahalanob is strategy.Social Scientist,43(3/4),3–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24372932

  • Patnaik U. (1999). Export-oriented agriculture and food security in developing countries and in India. In, The long transition: Essays on political economy (pp. 351 – 416). Tulika Books.

  • Peet R. & Hartwick E. (2009). Theories of development. The Guildford Press.

  • Prebisch R. (1959). Commercial policies in underdeveloped countries. American Economic Review, 49(2), 251–273.

  • Price R. B. (1968). Reply: “On 'Ideology and Indian Planning.'” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 27(2), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1968.tb01042.x

  • Raj K. N. (1965). Indian economic growth: Performance and prospects. Allied Publishers.

  • Rao S. K. (2004). Indian development strategies and policies, 1945–70. Paper presented at the Wassenar Conference on The development of development policies: Theories, actors and structures, 1945–1970. Hyderabad: Administrative Staff College of India.

  • Rao V. K. (1971). The Nehru legacy. Popular Prakashan.

  • Ray D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton University Press.

  • Rosenstein-Rodan P. N. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/2226317

  • Sanyal K. (2007). Rethinking capitalist development: Primitive accumulation, governmentality and postcolonial capitalism. Routledge.

  • Singer H. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, 40, 473 – 485.

  • Smith A. (1975). The wealth of nations. Everyman's Library.

  • Srinivasan T. N. (1996). “Professor Mahalanobis and economics.” In (ed.) A. Rudra, P.C. Mahalanobis: A biography. Oxford University Press.

  • Stiglitz J. E. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. Norton and Company.

  • Thirlwall A. P. (1972). Growth and development with special reference to developing economies. The Macmillan Press Ltd.

  • Todaro M. P. & Smith S. C. (2012). (10 ed.). Pearson Education Limited. th Economic development

  • Vasudevan, A. (1968). On “Ideology and Indian Planning.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 27(2), 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1968.tb01041.x


Abstract Views: 341

PDF Views: 0




  • Looking Back at the Nehru - Mahalanabis Strategy : A Discourse Analysis

Abstract Views: 341  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

samyo basu
Ph.D. Scholar, Economics Department, University of Calcutta. 56, B.T. Road, Kolkata - 700 050., India

Abstract


This paper discussed the constitutive relations between the Nehru-Mahalanabis strategy and the discourse of planning that had characterized Indian economic policy-making over 40 years after independence in their continuities and discontinuities of interaction. It understood and analyzed the theoretical underpinnings behind the heavy-scale industrialization policy through public investment (under export pessimism) in reflection of the predominant discourse of development that the third world subscribed to at that period — that of central-planning led capitalist accumulation. Rather than engaging in the multiple debates that had raged the political-economic policy-making of the post-reforms period, like that of agriculture vs. industry, state planning vs. market motive, growth vs. equity, etc., it cut through the analysis by the discourse method, which identified the particular way of knowing the reality – how the discourse produced and disseminated effects of truth, and brought players (e.g., the State) to act and intervene, thereby securing the legitimacy and power of the representation, or the regime of truth of the discourse.

Keywords


Heavy-Scale Industrialization, Public Sector Investment, Export Pessimism, Planning As Discourse, Discourse As Hegemonic

JELClassification Codes : B1, O2, P1, Z1

Paper Submission Date : September 9, 2022 ; Paper sent back for Revision : November 25, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : November 30, 2022


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/aijer%2F2022%2Fv11i4%2F172191