A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bhatia, Shilki
- Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Corporate Financial Performance in Automotive Sector:A Study of Select Companies
Authors
1 Ramjas College, University of Delhi, IN
2 Delhi Institute of Advanced Studies, Affiliated to GGSIP University, Delhi, IN
Source
ANVESHAK-International Journal of Management, Vol 5, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 85-101Abstract
The upsurge of the corporations has shaped and continues to produce many social problems. A corporate cannot afford to ignore the problems of the environment in which it functions. The organizations are expected to act conscientiously and assume responsibility for addressing these problems. It is no longer an easy task to be sustainable, i.e., meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of the next generations to meet their own needs. Therefore, the organizations are now being called upon to take responsibility for the ways their operations impact societies and the natural environment. Corporate social responsibility disclosures are still not an obligation in most of the countries but the concept has evolved in scope from purely financial accounting and reporting in the past to sustainability reporting today, incorporating reporting on economic, environmental and social issues. The literature scripts that the most studied aspect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been its link to Corporate Financial Performance (CFP). A considerable amount of studies, theoretical insights and empirical findings have focused on understanding the relationship.
The present research conducts a study to understand the relation between the corporate social responsibility disclosure (economic, environmental and social) of companies with the corporate financial performance (return on equity, return on assets, profit after tax and debt on equity). The automotive companies listed in SENSEX constitute the sample and to examine the corporate social responsibility disclosure level, the reports of companies published in the five years commencing from 2009-10 to 2013-14 were considered. The findings of this research suggested no relationship between the CSR disclosure and debt on equity and the CSR disclosure (economic information) and profit after tax. However, a positive relationship between CFP variables (return on assets and return on equity) and CSR disclosure exists. The positive relationship between profit after tax and CSR disclosure (environmental and social information) of the companies is also highlighted in the study.
Keywords
Global Reporting Initiative G-3, National Voluntary Guidelines, CSR Disclosure Index, ROA, ROE, D/E Ratio, Profit after Tax, EPS.
References
- Aras, G. and Aybars, A. (2010), “Managing Corporate Performance: Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Emerging Markets”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 59(3), pp. 229–254.
- Bowman, E.H. and Haire, M. (1976), “Social Impact Disclosure and Corporate Annual Reports”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 1(1), pp.11–21.
- Cochran, P.L. and Wood, R.A. (1984), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 42–56.
- Dey, Munmun and Sircar, Shouvik (2012), “Integrating CSR Initiatives with Business Strategy: A Study of Some Indian Companies”, The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. 11(1), pp. 50–61.
- Ehlert, Christina (2010), “Corporate Social Responsibility: Concept and Current Overview in Automotive Industry within Europe, America and Asia”, Seminar Internationals’ Management.
- EsraNemliCaliskan, Yusuf Ayturk (2011), “Corporate Reputation and Financial Performance: Evidence from Turkey”, Research Journal of International Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 24–31.
- Ghosh, Sumona (2015), “Is Corporate Social Responsibility in India, Still in a Confused State? A Study of the Participation of the Private Sector Companies of India in Corporate Social Responsibility Activities”, Global Business Review, Vol. 16(1), pp. 151–181.
- Godfrey, P.C. and Hatch, N.W. (2007), “Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: Anagenda for the 21st Century”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 70, pp. 87–98.
- Gupta, Ananda Das (2012), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategy: A Bird’s Eye View”, Global Business Review, Vol. 13(1), pp. 153–165.
- Bedi, Harpreet Singh (2010), Financial Performance and Social Responsibility: Indian Scenario, 2010.
- Nasr, Hassan (2010), Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Examination of Framework of Determinants and Consequences, http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/480/
- Hackston, D. and Milne, M. (1996), “Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 9(1), pp. 77–108.
- Hillman, A.J. and Keim, G.D. (2001), “Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22(2), pp. 125–39.
- Jones, S. (2007), “An Empirical Examination of the Market Returns and Financial Performance of Entities Engaged in Sustainability Reporting”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 17(41), pp. 78–87.
- Khan and Hassan (2013), “Relationship between Financial Performance and CSR Activities in Companies in Pakistan”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol. 4, pp. 918–928.
- Kapoor, Shveta and Sandhu, H.S. (2010), “Does it Pay to be Socially Responsible? An Empirical Examination of Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance”, Global Business Review, Vol. 11(2), pp. 185–208.
- Rim, Makni and Claude, Francoeur (2008), “Causality between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms”, Journal of Business Ethics.
- McGuire (1988), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 854–72.
- McWilliams, A. and Siegal, D. (2000), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 603–609.
- Morhardt, J.E. (2002), “Scoring Corporate Environmental and Sustainability Reports using GRI 2000”, ISO 14031 and other Criteria, Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, Vol. 9, pp. 215–33.
- Vijaya, Murthy (2008), “Corporate Social Disclosure Practices of Top Software Firms in India”, Global Business Review, 2008, Vol. 9(2), pp. 173–188.
- Palmer, Harmony J. (2012), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Does it Pay to be Good?”, http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/529
- Preston, L.E. and O’Bannon, D.P. (1997), “The Corporate Social-financial Performance Relationship”, Business and Society, Vol. 36(4), pp. 419–29.
- Roberts, R. (1992), “Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17(6), pp. 595–612.
- Tewari, Ruchi and Dave, Darshana (2012), Corporate Social Responsibility: Communication through Sustainability Reports by Indian and Multinational Companies”, Global Business Review, Vol. 3(3), pp. 393–405.
- Tsoutsoura Margarita (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”, Applied Financial Project, University of California at Berkeley.
- Trotman, K. and Bradley, G.W. (1981), “Associations between Social Responsibility Disclosure and Characteristics of Companies”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 6(4), pp. 355–62.
- Waddock, S.A. and Graves, S.B. (1997), “The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18(4), pp. 303–319.
- Yang Fu-Ju, et al. (2010), “The Linkage between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4(4), pp. 406–413.