Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

LibQUAL+® Based Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis for Assessing Library Service Quality : A Case Study


Affiliations
1 Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
2 Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
3 Operations and Decision Sciences, T A Pai Management Institute, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
 

The main purpose of this study was to measure the strengths and weaknesses of library services using Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA). It also intends to identify the critical areas of the library within the three dimensions of LibQUAL+® based on student feedback. Data were collected from students at a private engineering institute in India, using a structured questionnaire to achieve these objectives. Respondents rated the importance and performance of library services on the three dimensions of LibQUAL+®: affect of service (AOS), information control (IC), and library as a place (LP) on a 7-point Likert scale. Analysis was carried out using IPMA to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the library services. The findings suggest that LP was the most essential and well-performing dimension in the library context. IC is the most important, but poorly performing dimension. Therefore, strategies are recommended to ensure the effectiveness of the service. The findings of this study would help library administrators, and policymakers formulate appropriate fund allocation/reallocation based on user requirements. The integration of IPMA and LibQUAL+® in measuring library service quality is a significant contribution of this study to LibQUAL+® literature.

Keywords

LibQUAL+®, Importance-Performance Analysis, Service Quality, Library Services.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Nyakweba I. Bukirwa, J M Sendikadiwa E and Ratanya F C, Users’ needs and expectations on information services provided in libraries: case of four public university libraries from the western region of Kenya, Library Management, 43 (1-2) (2022) 1–14.
  • Nitecki D A, Changing the concept and measure of service quality in academic libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship, 22 (3) (1996) 181–190.
  • Sajna K P and Mohamed Haneefa K, Service quality of special libraries in Kerala, India, DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 41 (2) (2021) 75–81.
  • Hossain M J Islam M A and Saadi M S, Evaluating users' experience of service performance using SERVPERF scale: A case study of some private university libraries in Bangladesh, Annals of Library and Information Studies, 60 (4) (2014) 249–259.
  • Hasugian J and Lubis D, Library service quality and student trust a case study of the University of Sumatera Utara Library, Indonesia, DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 41 (5) (2021) 345–351.
  • Ghaedi R, Valizadeh-Haghi S, Ahmadi E, Zeraatkar Z and Baghestani AR. Gaps between users expectations and their perceptions on service quality of college libraries of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences: a case study, DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 40 (5) (2020) 131–136.
  • Westbrook R A and Newman J W, An analysis of shopper dissatisfaction for major household appliances, Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (8) (1978) 456–467.
  • Carman J M, Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions, Journal of Retailing, 6 (1) (1990) 33.
  • Mallya J and Patwardhan V, Hospitality students’ perception of college library service quality: Importance-performance analysis, DESIDOC Journal of library and Information Technology, 38 (2) (2018) 125–131.
  • Roszkowski M J, Baky J S and Jones D B, So which score on the LibQual+TM tells me if library users are satisfied?, Library and Information Science Research, 27 (4) (2005) 424–439.
  • Hughes K, Tourist Satisfaction: A Guided “Cultural” Tour in North Queensland, Australian Psychologist, 26, 166–171 (1991).
  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V A and Berry L L, SERQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality, Journal of Retailing, 64 (1) (1988) 28.
  • Ladhari R and Morales M, Perceived service quality, perceived value and recommendation A study among Canadian public library users, Library Management, 29 (4-5) (2008) 352–366.
  • Choshaly S H and Mirabolghasemi M, Using SEM-PLS to assess users satisfaction of library service quality: evidence from Malaysia, Library Management, 40 (3-4) (2019) 240–250.
  • Edgar B, Questioning LibQUAL+: critiquing its assessment of academic library effectiveness, Proceedings of the American Society for Information, 43 (1) (2007) 1–17.
  • Thompson B Cook C and Heath F, The LibQUAL+gap measurement model: the bad, the ugly, and the good of gap measurement, Performance Measurement and Metrics, 1 (3) (2000) 165–178
  • Martilla J A and James J C, Importance-Performance Analysis, Journal of Marketing, 41(1) (1977) 77.
  • Jou R C and Day Y J, Application of revised importance–performance analysis to investigate critical service quality of hotel online booking, Sustainability, 13 (2021) 2043.
  • Thien L M. Leong M C and Por F P, Factors contributing to Gen Z’s deep learning: investigating undergraduates’ course experience in Malaysian private higher education institutions, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, (2021) https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2021-0005
  • Alburo H R, Feliscuzo L S and Cherry Lyn C L C, Visualizing students’ satisfaction and importance of academic services: Applications of c5.0 algorithm and importance-performance analysis method, Journal of Advance Research and Dynamic Control Systems, 12 (1) (2020) 121–131.
  • Buttle F, SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda, European Journal of Marketing, 30 (1) (1996) 8–32.
  • Iacobucci D, Ostrom A and Grayson K, Distinguishing service quality and customer satisfaction: the voice of the consumer, Journal Consumer Psychology, 4 (3) (1995) 277–303.
  • Kahneman D and Miller DT, Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives, Psychological Review, 93 (2) (1986) 136–153.
  • Bouman M and Van der Wiele T, Measuring service quality in the car service industry: building and testing an instrument, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 3 (4) (1992) 4–16.
  • Voorbij H, The use of LibQUAL+ by European research libraries, Performance Measurement and Metrics, 13 (3) (2012) 154–168.
  • Cronin J J and Taylor S A, Measuring service quality: A Re-examination and Extension, Journal of Marketing, 56 (3) (1992) 55-68.
  • Najiyah A N and Dachyar M, Service quality improvement strategy for container terminal using SERVQUAL and house of quality, 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, (2021) 1613–1621.
  • Verma K, Importance Performance Analysis and Servqual Model: an integrated approach for enhancing customer satisfaction, Review of Professional Management, 14 (1) (2016) 51–59.
  • Warjiyono W and Hellyana C, An analysis &measurement of website quality using the WebQual 4.0 and importance performance analysis (IPA) method (A Case Study Of Jagalempeni village Brebes). InProceedings of The 2nd International Conference On Advance And Scientific Innovation, ICASI 2019, 18 July, Banda Aceh, Indonesia 2019 Nov 26.
  • García-Fernández J, Fernández-Gavira J, Sánchez-Oliver AJ, Gálvez-Ruíz P, Grimaldi-Puyana M, Cepeda-Carrión G. Importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA) to evaluate servicescape fitness consumer by gender and age, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (18) (2020) 6562.

Abstract Views: 152

PDF Views: 82




  • LibQUAL+® Based Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis for Assessing Library Service Quality : A Case Study

Abstract Views: 152  |  PDF Views: 82

Authors

Giridhar Kamath
Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
Jyothi Mallya
Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
Vasanth Kamath
Operations and Decision Sciences, T A Pai Management Institute, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
Valsaraj Payini
Welcomgroup Graduate School of Hotel Administration, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India

Abstract


The main purpose of this study was to measure the strengths and weaknesses of library services using Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA). It also intends to identify the critical areas of the library within the three dimensions of LibQUAL+® based on student feedback. Data were collected from students at a private engineering institute in India, using a structured questionnaire to achieve these objectives. Respondents rated the importance and performance of library services on the three dimensions of LibQUAL+®: affect of service (AOS), information control (IC), and library as a place (LP) on a 7-point Likert scale. Analysis was carried out using IPMA to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the library services. The findings suggest that LP was the most essential and well-performing dimension in the library context. IC is the most important, but poorly performing dimension. Therefore, strategies are recommended to ensure the effectiveness of the service. The findings of this study would help library administrators, and policymakers formulate appropriate fund allocation/reallocation based on user requirements. The integration of IPMA and LibQUAL+® in measuring library service quality is a significant contribution of this study to LibQUAL+® literature.

Keywords


LibQUAL+®, Importance-Performance Analysis, Service Quality, Library Services.

References