Annals of Library and Information Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Perceptions of Engineering Faculty Members Regarding Research Collaborations


Affiliations
1 Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Research Assistant, Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
 

The purpose of this study is to connect the perceptions and understanding of the collaboration of faculty members of NIRF ranked top-performing engineering institutes with the publication they have. The quantitative bibliometric analysis along with the enquiry with authors show that national collaboration, mainly with academic authors of same or other institution, still is a preferred. Despite international collaboration leading to more average citations, there is no significant gain seen. Scholars collaborate for many reasons, but mostly to gain popularity among peers or to receive citation benefits. Collaboration with private or government organizations, although uncommon, is primarily used to test newly developed ideas or to provide consultancy. Most of the respondents believe that funding is important for research collaborations and low commitment of team members to the shared goal is a major barrier in collaboration. We argue that as the share of University-Industry-Government research collaborations is low, a strong congruence between knowledge capital and entrepreneurial capital is needed to develop an entrepreneurial university.

Keywords

Collaboration, University-Industry-Government Collaboration, Qualitative and Quantitative Study.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Huang F, Finkelstein M and Rostan M, The Internationalization of the Academy: Changes, Realities and Prospects, (Springer;Netherlands), 2014, p. 119–143. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7278-6_7

  • Vick T E and Robertson M A, Systematic literature review of UK university–industry collaboration for knowledge transfer: a future research agenda, Science Public Policy, 45 (2018) 579–590. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scx086

  • Dvir Y and Yemini M, Mobility as a continuum: European commission mobility policies for schools and higher education, Journal of Education Policy, 32(2) (2015) 198–210. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1243259

  • Douglass J A, The New Flagship University: Changing the Paradigm from Global Ranking to National Relevancy, (Palgrave Macmillan; New York), 2016, p. 9-29. doi:10.1057/9781137500496

  • Ankrah S and Al-Tabbaa O, Universities–industry collaboration: a systematic review, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3) (2015) 387–408. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003

  • Paswan J, Singh V K, Karmakar M and Singh P, Does university–industry–government collaboration in research gets higher citation and altmetric impact? A case study from India, Scientometrics, 127(11) (2022) 6063–6082. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04508-1

  • Audretsch D B and Belitski M, Three-ring entrepreneurial university: in search of a new business model, Studies in Higher Education, 46(5) (2021) 977–987. doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1896804

  • Moed H F, Bar-Ilan J and Halevi G, A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus, Journal of Informetrics, 10(2) (2016) 533–551.

  • Arroyabe M F, Schumann M and Arranz C F A, Mapping the entrepreneurial university literature: a text mining approach, Studies in Higher Education, 47(5) (2022) 955–963. doi:10.1080/03075079.2022.2055318

  • Radko N, Belitski M and Kalyuzhnova Y, Conceptualising the entrepreneurial university: the stakeholder approach, The Journal of Technology Transfer, (2022). doi:10.1007/s10961-022-09926-0

  • Baker J A and White M D, Economics and the Virtues: Building a New Moral Foundation, (Oxford University Press; Oxford), 2016, p. 119–140. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701392 .003.0007

  • Costa M R, The dynamics of social capital in scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51 (2014) 1–4. doi: 10.1002/meet.2014.14505101137

  • Volk S C, Comparative Communication Research: A Study of the Conceptual, Methodological, and Social Challenges of International Collaborative Studies in Communication Science, (Springer;New York), 2021, p. 175-261.

  • Borrego M, Beddoes K and Jesiek B K, International perspectives on the need for interdisciplinary expertise in engineering education scholarship, In Proceedings of the paper presented at 20th AAEE Annual Conference, University of Adelaide, Australia, 2009, p. 695-696.

  • Jesiek B K, Borrego M and Beddoes K, Advancing global capacity for engineering education research: relating research to practice, policy and industry, European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2) (2010) 117-134.

  • Cummings J N and Kiesler S, Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research, In Proceedings of the paper presented at ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Diego, CA, USA, 8-12 November 2008, p. 437–446. doi: 10.1145/1460563.1460633

  • Simon D, Kuhlmann S, Stamm J and Canzler W, Handbook on Science and Public Policy, (Edward Elgar Publishing; Cheltenham, UK), 2019, p. 419–447. doi: 10.4337/9781784715946.00033

  • Dusdal J and Powell J J W, Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: a sociology of science case study, Science Public Policy, 48 (2021) 235–245. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scab010

  • Bozeman B, Gaughan M, Youtie J, Slade C P and Rimes H, Research collaboration experiences, good and bad: dispatches from the front lines, Science Public Policy, 43 (2016) 226–244. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv035

  • Cummings J N, Kiesler S, Bosagh Zadeh R and Balakrishnan A D, Group heterogeneity increases the risks of large group size: a longitudinal study of productivity in research groups, Psychological Science, 24 (2013) 880–890. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463082

  • Newell C and Bain A, Academics’ perceptions of collaboration in higher education course design, Higher Education Research and Development, 39(4) (2020) 748–763. doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1690431

  • Kim S and Ju B, An analysis of faculty perceptions: attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution, Library & Information Science Research, 30 (2008) 282–290.

  • Manhong L and Linlin L, Early career researchers’ perceptions of collaborative research in the context of academic capitalism on the Chinese Mainland, Higher Education Research & Development, (2020). doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1724898

  • Cochran W G, Sampling Techniques, 3rd edn (John Wiley & Sons;New York), 1977, p. 74-75.

  • Mukherjee B and Gangopadhyay S, Inconsistencies in the retrieval of indic names in web of science: a case study of women authors, Annals of Library and Information Studies, 68(2) (2021) 170–77.

  • Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Liu J and Bu Y, Patterns of knowledge diffusion via research collaboration on a global level, In Proceedings of the paper presented at 18th international conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Leuven, Belgium, 12-15 July 2021, p. 269–280.

  • Bouabid H and Achachi H, Size of science team at university and internal co-publications: science policy implications, Scientometrics, 127 (2022) 6993–7013. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04285-x


Abstract Views: 147

PDF Views: 96




  • Perceptions of Engineering Faculty Members Regarding Research Collaborations

Abstract Views: 147  |  PDF Views: 96

Authors

Bhaskar Mukherjee
Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
Priya Tiwari
Research Assistant, Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to connect the perceptions and understanding of the collaboration of faculty members of NIRF ranked top-performing engineering institutes with the publication they have. The quantitative bibliometric analysis along with the enquiry with authors show that national collaboration, mainly with academic authors of same or other institution, still is a preferred. Despite international collaboration leading to more average citations, there is no significant gain seen. Scholars collaborate for many reasons, but mostly to gain popularity among peers or to receive citation benefits. Collaboration with private or government organizations, although uncommon, is primarily used to test newly developed ideas or to provide consultancy. Most of the respondents believe that funding is important for research collaborations and low commitment of team members to the shared goal is a major barrier in collaboration. We argue that as the share of University-Industry-Government research collaborations is low, a strong congruence between knowledge capital and entrepreneurial capital is needed to develop an entrepreneurial university.

Keywords


Collaboration, University-Industry-Government Collaboration, Qualitative and Quantitative Study.

References