Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Post-Publication Review: The Role of Science News Outlets and Social Media


Affiliations
1 Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
2 UniLaSalle, AGHYLE, Beauvais, France
3 Linköping University, Sweden
4 University of California, Riverside: Riverside, CA, India

This article explores the significant role of post-publication review in maintaining research integrity and the potential of science news outlets and social media to improve the process. By examining recent cases, this article reveals the vulnerabilities of pre-publication peer review and suggests a more inclusive approach. The importance of broader public scrutiny is emphasized, as retractions in these cases occurred only after gaining significant attention on social media. The term "peer-review" should be expanded to include various experts and platforms beyond traditional academic journals. The incidents examined in this study underscore the necessity of openness and vigilance in maintaining research integrity, especially in the era of artificial intelligence and digital platforms. Researchers need to understand that research integrity extends beyond journal-led pre-publication reviews. They should also apply their scientific intellect by conducting post-publication reviews.

Keywords

Pre-publication reviews, Post-publication reviews, Journal-led peer review, Community-led peer review, Academic misconduct, Research integrity
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 26




  • Post-Publication Review: The Role of Science News Outlets and Social Media

Abstract Views: 26  | 

Authors

Dasapta Erwin Irawan
Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Olivier Pourret
UniLaSalle, AGHYLE, Beauvais, France
Lonni Besançon
Linköping University, Sweden
Sandy Hardian Susanto Herho
University of California, Riverside: Riverside, CA, India

Abstract


This article explores the significant role of post-publication review in maintaining research integrity and the potential of science news outlets and social media to improve the process. By examining recent cases, this article reveals the vulnerabilities of pre-publication peer review and suggests a more inclusive approach. The importance of broader public scrutiny is emphasized, as retractions in these cases occurred only after gaining significant attention on social media. The term "peer-review" should be expanded to include various experts and platforms beyond traditional academic journals. The incidents examined in this study underscore the necessity of openness and vigilance in maintaining research integrity, especially in the era of artificial intelligence and digital platforms. Researchers need to understand that research integrity extends beyond journal-led pre-publication reviews. They should also apply their scientific intellect by conducting post-publication reviews.

Keywords


Pre-publication reviews, Post-publication reviews, Journal-led peer review, Community-led peer review, Academic misconduct, Research integrity