AMC Indian Journal of Civil Engineering

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Structural Performance of Cold Form Steel Truss and its Comparison with Hot Rolled Steel


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Managements Studies, Aurangabad, Maharashtra - 431 005, India
2 Head of Department (Civil Engineering Department), Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Managements Studies, Aurangabad, Maharashtra – 431 005, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper presents analytical observation results on the performance of cold formed steel truss and hot rolled steel truss. Two trusses of same dimensions and same type with different materials have been studied and compared. Both the materials are compared on the basis of fast, better, and economic construction. One truss is completely designed and analyzed in hot rolled steel while the same model is designed in cold formed steel. Both the trusses are designed in ETABS. Results of the present study would be handy in designing a truss that leads to optimal use of material. In constructions of residential and industrial buildings, the use of cold-formed steel (CFS) structures has now grown-up considerably, and now it is becoming a suitable alternative to general and conventional methods due to its massive advantages, like it is very light weight, it has high quality, and ease of construction. The present research targets to evaluate the lateral performance of cold formed steel truss systems. This research is crucial for improving the design of cold-formed steel (CFS) truss structures because there is unavailability of adequate information presently in the available codes and standards.

Keywords

Cold Formed Steel, ETABS , Hot Rolled Steel, Light Weight.

Manuscript Received: April 3, 2020; Revised: April 21, 2020; Accepted: April 25, 2020.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • General Construction In Steel-Code of-Practice, IS: 800-2007.

  • Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquakes) for Buildings and Structures - Dead Loads (DL), IS:875 (Part one) – 1987.

  • Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquakes) for Buildings and Structures - Live Loads (LL), IS : 875 (Part two), 1987.

  • Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures - Wind Loads (WL), IS : 875 (Part 3), 1987.

  • N. Subramanian, Design of steel-structures, 2008. Oxford University Press.

  • N. Subramanian, “Pre-engineered buildings selection of framing system, roofing and wall materials,” The Master-builder, 2008, pp. 48-62. [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f62b/eb498c99273a2691991918a1a76d58d25778.pdf

  • G. Singh, Introduction to pre-engineered buildings, Retrieved from http://www.engneeringcivil.com/pre-enginered-buildngs.html

  • A. Patrikar and K. K. Pathak, “Fully stressed design of the fink truss using STAAD.Pro Software,” Open J. of Civil Eng., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 631-642, 2016. https:/dx./doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2016.64051

  • John A. Rolfes and R. A. MacCrimmon, “Industrial building design - seismic issues,” The Iron and Steel Technol., pp. 282-298, 2007.


Abstract Views: 197

PDF Views: 1




  • Structural Performance of Cold Form Steel Truss and its Comparison with Hot Rolled Steel

Abstract Views: 197  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Sachin Salve
Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Managements Studies, Aurangabad, Maharashtra - 431 005, India
Sunil Shinde
Head of Department (Civil Engineering Department), Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Managements Studies, Aurangabad, Maharashtra – 431 005, India

Abstract


This paper presents analytical observation results on the performance of cold formed steel truss and hot rolled steel truss. Two trusses of same dimensions and same type with different materials have been studied and compared. Both the materials are compared on the basis of fast, better, and economic construction. One truss is completely designed and analyzed in hot rolled steel while the same model is designed in cold formed steel. Both the trusses are designed in ETABS. Results of the present study would be handy in designing a truss that leads to optimal use of material. In constructions of residential and industrial buildings, the use of cold-formed steel (CFS) structures has now grown-up considerably, and now it is becoming a suitable alternative to general and conventional methods due to its massive advantages, like it is very light weight, it has high quality, and ease of construction. The present research targets to evaluate the lateral performance of cold formed steel truss systems. This research is crucial for improving the design of cold-formed steel (CFS) truss structures because there is unavailability of adequate information presently in the available codes and standards.

Keywords


Cold Formed Steel, ETABS , Hot Rolled Steel, Light Weight.

Manuscript Received: April 3, 2020; Revised: April 21, 2020; Accepted: April 25, 2020.


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijce%2F2020%2Fv3i1%2F152719