Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Susceptibility of Diamond Back Moth Plutella xylostella (L.) to Diamide Insecticides


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Crop Protection, Agricultural College and Research Institute (AC&RI), TNAU, Vazhavachanur 606753, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Nano Science and Technology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
 

The results on the toxicity of diamide group of insecticides to diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) indicated that the LC50 and LC95 values of flubendiamide for F1 to F12 generation decreased from 0.016 to 0.003 and 0.233 to 0.213 ppm, respectively; and with chlorantraniliprole these decreased from 0.011 to 0.002 and 0.407 to 0.095 ppm, respectively. The corresponding values of cyantraniliprole decreased from 0.000990 to 0.000365 and 0.038 to 0.028 ppm, respectively. Considering the F12 generation as susceptible, the tentative discriminating doses (DD) by leaf disc method to third instar larvae were arrived at as 0.003, 0.002 and 0.000365 ppm for flubendiamide, chlorantraniliprole and cyantraniliprole, respectively based on LC50.

Keywords

Plutella xylostella, F1 to F12 generations, susceptibility, diamides, flubendiamide, chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole, acute toxicity, LC50, LC95, discriminating dose.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abbott W S. 1925. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265-267.
  • Calderson J I, Hare C J. 1986. Control of diamondback moth in Southeast Asia by profenofos. Diamondback moth management. Talekar N S, Griggs T D. (eds.). Proceedings. Ist international workshop, 1985, AVRDC, Taiwan. pp. 289-295.
  • Chandrasekaran J, Regupathy A. 1996. Status of insecticide resistance in field population of diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella in Tamil Nadu. IPM and Sustainable Agriculture - an Entomological Approach 6: 95-99.
  • Hou R F. 1986. Mass rearing of diamondback moth. Talekar N S, Griggs T D (eds.) Diamondback moth management. Proceedings. 1st International workshop. Asian vegetable research and development centre, Shunbua. Taiwan. pp. 89-95.
  • Krishnakumar N K, Srinivasan K, Suman C L, Ramachander P R. 1984. Optimum control strategy of cabbage pests from a chemical control trial. Progressive Horticulture 18: 104-110.
  • Lavanya D. 2004. Studies on the susceptibility of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on cabbage to the insecticides of new chemistry (special reference to Avermectins). M Sc Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. 59 pp.
  • Liu M Y, Sun C N. 1984. Rearing diamond back moth (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutide) on rape seedlings by a modification of the Koshihara and Yamada method. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 1608-1609.
  • Mohan M, Gujar G T. 2000. Susceptibility pattern and development of resistance in the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella L., to Bacillus thuringiensis Ber. var kurstaki in India. Pest Management Science 56: 189-194.
  • Muralitharan V, Manoharan T, Vinothkumar B, Preetha G. 2013. Acute toxicity of new molecular insecticides to diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Madras Agricultural Journal 100: 583-586.
  • Nanda Kishore M, Krishnamoorthy S V, Kuttalam S. 2014. Baseline susceptibility of diamondback Moth Plutella xylostella L (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC in Tamil Nadu. Trends in Biosciences 7(17): 2504-2510.
  • Pasupathi E, Johnson Thangaraj Edward Y S, Kannan M, Ramalingam J. 2021. Understanding the biology of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) of cauliflower under laboratory condition. Indian Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences 7(2): 1-6.
  • Raju S V S. 1996. An overview of insecticide resistance in Plutella xylostella L. in India. Resistant Pest Management 8(1): 23-24.
  • Regupathy A, Dhamu K P. 2001. Statistics work book for insecticide toxicology. Softeck computers, Coimbatore. pp. 180-181.
  • Sannaveerappanavar V T, Viraktamath C A. 1997. Management of insecticide resistance diamondback moth Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) on cabbage using some novel insecticides. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31: 230-235.
  • Sannaveerappanavar V T, Viraktamath C A. 2006. Resistance to insecticides in Indian strain of diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 15(2): 32-35.
  • Selby T P, Lahm G P, Stevenson T M, Hughes K A, Cordova D, Annan I B, Barry J D, Benner E A, Currie M J, Pahutski T F. 2013. Discovery of cyantraniliprole, a potent and selective anthranilic diamide ryanodine receptor activator with cross-spectrum insecticidal activity. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry letters 23: 6341-6345.
  • Shanmugapriya V, Johnson Thangaraj Edward Y S, Kannan M, Mohan Kumar S, Ramanathan A. 2019. Baseline toxicity of diamide group of insecticides against diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7(3): 3524-3527.
  • Sharma S, Senrung A, Singh A K. 2014. Toxic effect of neem, Azadirachta indica (A. Juss) foliage extracts against diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Biopesticides 7: 99-105.
  • Silva J E Da, De Siqueira A A H, Tadeu B M, De C Silva M R, Barros R. 2012. Baseline susceptible of cholarantraniliprole of Brazilian population of Plutella xylostella. L. Crop Protection 35: 97-101.
  • Singh H N. 2002. Mechanism and management of insecticide resistance in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. Final technical report of Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi project F1-14/96, Department of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. 48 pp.
  • Sunitha V, Singh T V K, Supriya G B, Satyanarayana J. 2020. Insecticide resistance monitoring of diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella (Linn.) in Delhi population. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 8(5): 1706-1712.
  • Tohnishi M, Nakao H, Furuya T, Seo A, Kodama H, Tsubata K, Fujioka S, Kodama H, Hirooka T, Nishimatsu T. 2005. Flubendiamide, a novel insecticide highly active against lepidopterous insect pests. Journal of Pesticide Science 30(4): 354-360.
  • Verma A N, Sandhu G S. 1968. Chemical control of diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curtis). Journal Agricultural Research Punjab Agricultural University 5: 420-423.
  • Yusoff N, Abd Ghani I, Othman N W, Aizat W M, Hassan M. 2021. Toxicity and sublethal effect of farnesyl acetate on diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Insects 12: 109.

Abstract Views: 136

PDF Views: 58




  • Susceptibility of Diamond Back Moth Plutella xylostella (L.) to Diamide Insecticides

Abstract Views: 136  |  PDF Views: 58

Authors

E. Pasupathi
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India
Y .S. Johnson Thangaraj Edward
Department of Crop Protection, Agricultural College and Research Institute (AC&RI), TNAU, Vazhavachanur 606753, Tamil Nadu, India
M. Kannan
Department of Nano Science and Technology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


The results on the toxicity of diamide group of insecticides to diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) indicated that the LC50 and LC95 values of flubendiamide for F1 to F12 generation decreased from 0.016 to 0.003 and 0.233 to 0.213 ppm, respectively; and with chlorantraniliprole these decreased from 0.011 to 0.002 and 0.407 to 0.095 ppm, respectively. The corresponding values of cyantraniliprole decreased from 0.000990 to 0.000365 and 0.038 to 0.028 ppm, respectively. Considering the F12 generation as susceptible, the tentative discriminating doses (DD) by leaf disc method to third instar larvae were arrived at as 0.003, 0.002 and 0.000365 ppm for flubendiamide, chlorantraniliprole and cyantraniliprole, respectively based on LC50.

Keywords


Plutella xylostella, F1 to F12 generations, susceptibility, diamides, flubendiamide, chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole, acute toxicity, LC50, LC95, discriminating dose.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2021.132