Indian Journal of Energy

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Is Solar Electrification a Sustainable Solution for Rural Electrification? Learning from Field Experience


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong-793022, India
 

Addressing the needs of sustainable development also needs to address the issue of rural electrification. The government of India has taken different policies for rural electrification for remote villages in India by distributing Solar Home System (SHS). Such programs have been executed in the state of Assam also, which is situated in the North Eastern part of India. But the thing to be noted is that such installations are highly subsidized. Under such circumstance people may not be eager to buy from market and there is problem of non-payment of monthly sustenance charge which beneficiaries are supposed to pay for replacement of batteries. There is difficulty in repairing SHS which is coupled with non availability of spare parts. Therefore, sustainability of such program is a very relevant issue to address. The main objective of this research is to see whether the installation process is sustainable or not and to discuss the impact of solar electrification on the community. It will also study the factors that affect purchasing decision of SHS. The study will help policy makers to promote sustainable rural development by providing reliable source of energy for rural electrification.

Keywords

Solar Home System, Village Electrification Committee, Subsidy
User
Notifications

  • Srivastava, L. and Rahman, I.H., (2006) Energy for sustainable development in India: Linkages and strategic direction Energy Policy, Vol. 34, pp. 643–654.

  • Bhattacharyya, S. C., (2006) Energy access problem of the poor in India: Is rural electrification a remedy? Energy Policy, Vol. 34, pp.3387-3397.

  • Buragohain, T.(2012) impact of solar energy in rural development in India, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp:334-338.

  • IEA (2013) World energy outlook, International Energy Agency, Avilable at http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org.

  • Palit, D. and J. Singh (2011) Lighting a Billion Lives – Empowering the rural poor, Boiling Point. Issue 59, pp: 42-45.

  • Urmee, T., and Harries, D., (2009) A survey of solar PV program implementers in Asia and the Pacific regions, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol.13, pp.24-32.

  • Mala, K., Schlapfer, A. and Pryor, T., (2009) Batter or worse? The role of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in sustainable development: Case studies of remote atoll communities in Kiribati, Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, pp.358-361.

  • Cherni, J.A. and Hill, Y., (2009) Energy and policy providing for sustainable rural livelihoods in remote locations – The case of Cuba, Geoforum, Vol. 40, pp. 645–654.

  • Wijayatunga, P.D.C and Attalage, R. A., (2005) Socio-economic impact of solar home systems in rural Sri Lanka: a case-study, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. No. 2l, pp. 5-9.

  • Mondal A. H. and Klein, D., (2011) Impacts of solar home systems on social development in rural Bangladesh, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 15, pp.17–20.

  • Iemsomboon P., Tangtham, N., Kanjanasuntorn, S. and Bualert, S., (2011) Modeling community quality of life indicators for developing solar home system in remote areas, Energy Procedia, Vol. 9, pp. 44–55.

  • Chakrabarti, S. and Chakrabarti, S., (2002) Rural electrification programme with solar energy in remote region–a case study in an island, Energy Policy, Vol.30, pp. 33–42.

  • DFID (2002) Energy for the poor, underpinning the millennium development goals. Department for International Development. Available at www.dfid.gov.uk.

  • Welsch, H. and Kühling, J., (2009) Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: The role of reference groups and routine behavior, Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, pp.166–176

  • Macintosh, A. and Wilkinson, D., (2011) Searching for public benefits in solar subsidies: A case study on the Australian government’s residential photovoltaic rebate program, Energy Policy, Vol. 39, pp. 3199–3209.

  • Batlle, C., (2011) A method for allocating renewable energy source subsidies among final energy consumers, Energy Policy, Vol. 39, pp. 2586–2595.

  • Chaurey, A., Ranganathan, M. and Mohanty, P., (2004) Electricity access for geographically disadvantaged rural communities-technology and policy insights, Energy Policy, Vol. 32, pp.1693-1705.

  • Palit, D. and Chaurey, A., (2011) Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia: Status and best practices, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol.15, pp. 266–276.

  • Wang, L., S. Bandyopadhyay, M. C. Davies and H. Samad (2011) Quantifying carbon and distributional benefits of solar home system programs in Bangladesh, Policy Research Working Paper, No: WPS 5545. Available at http://econ.worldbank.org.

  • AEDA (2013) Assam Energy Development Agency. Available at http://www.assamrenewable.org.

  • Diaz, P., Arias, C.A., Gonzaler, M.G., Sandoval, D and Lobato, R., (2011) Solar home system electrification in dispersed rural areas: a 10 year experience in Jujuy, Argentina, Prog. Photovolt: Res Appl, DOI:10.1002/pip.1181

  • Laufer, D. and Schafer, M., (2011) The implementation of solar home systems as a poverty reduction strategy-a case study in Srilanka, Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol15, pp.330-336

  • ESMAP (2002) Rural electrification and development in the Philippines: measuring the social and economic benefits, Report 255/02, World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.

  • Anderson, S. (2013) Logistic regression. Available at www.schatz.sju.edu.


Abstract Views: 564

PDF Views: 325




  • Is Solar Electrification a Sustainable Solution for Rural Electrification? Learning from Field Experience

Abstract Views: 564  |  PDF Views: 325

Authors

Daisy Das
Department of Economics, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong-793022, India

Abstract


Addressing the needs of sustainable development also needs to address the issue of rural electrification. The government of India has taken different policies for rural electrification for remote villages in India by distributing Solar Home System (SHS). Such programs have been executed in the state of Assam also, which is situated in the North Eastern part of India. But the thing to be noted is that such installations are highly subsidized. Under such circumstance people may not be eager to buy from market and there is problem of non-payment of monthly sustenance charge which beneficiaries are supposed to pay for replacement of batteries. There is difficulty in repairing SHS which is coupled with non availability of spare parts. Therefore, sustainability of such program is a very relevant issue to address. The main objective of this research is to see whether the installation process is sustainable or not and to discuss the impact of solar electrification on the community. It will also study the factors that affect purchasing decision of SHS. The study will help policy makers to promote sustainable rural development by providing reliable source of energy for rural electrification.

Keywords


Solar Home System, Village Electrification Committee, Subsidy

References