Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Critical Analysis of Direct Benefit Transfer in India


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India
 

Objectives: To critically evaluate direct benefit transfer mission in India, in terms of Aadhaar Card linkages, seeded bank accounts and in light of global experience. The paper also takes an account of the inflationary pressures that unconditional cash transfers may bring in to the system.

Methods: This is more of a descriptive study. Literature related to the study is critically approached and a few facts and figure that are officially released by direct benefit transfer mission of India has been used for the better understanding for the period 2013-2017.

Findings: From the analysis it is evident that by the time the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) system has been introduced in 2013, 5.68 crore beneficiaries were not holding an Aadhaar and the number became 8.36 crore in 2017. In 2017 only 29.01 % of fund transfer has been done through Aadhaar seeded bank accounts. Therefore even though Direct Benefit Transfer system is an innovative and efficient system, India was not prepared to take it up. So serious efforts of government is required in the grass ischolar_main level by providing Aadhaar and Aadhaar bridge payment assistance to the common people.

Application: Continuous evaluation is required to ensure that no beneficiaries have denied their services in name of Aadhaar bridge payments. They must be given enough time and support considering India’s depth and breadth in size and its poor literacy level among poor people. A study in the future when more data is available about the implementation of direct benefit transfer, can tell more systematically about the success and failures of the programme in India.


Keywords

Conditional Versus Unconditional Benefit Transfers, Direct Benefit Transfers, Aadhaar Bridge Payments, Aadhaar Seeded Bank Accounts.
User
Notifications

  • Vinod Vyasulu. Brazil’s’ Fome Zero’ strategy: can India implement cash transfers? Economic and Political Weekly. 2010; 45(26), 89-95.
  • Gaspar Fajth, Claudia Vinay. Conditional cash transfers: A global perspective. MDG Insights. 2010; 1, 1-6.
  • Marco Stampini, Leopoldo Tornarolli. The growth of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean: did they go too far? Technical report. IZA Policy Paper. 2012.
  • Nandan Nilekani. Interim report of the task force on direct transfer of subsidies on kerosene. Environment Portal Knowledge for Change. 2011.
  • Deepak Mohanty. Report of the committee on medium-term path on financial inclusion. Reserve Bank of India. 2015; 1-102.
  • Devesh Kapur, Partha Mukhopadhyay, Arvind Subramanian. The case for direct cash transfers to the poor. Economic and Political Weekly. 2008; 37-43.
  • Cash versus kind. https://www.theigc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Ghatak-Et-Al-2013-Working-Paper.pdf. Date accessed: 03/07/2013.
  • Sudha Narayanan. A case for reframing the cash transfer debate in India. Economic and Political Weekly. 2011; 41-48.
  • Ariel Fiszbein, N.R. Schady. Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty. World Bank Publications. 2009.
  • Francesca Bastagli. Conditional cash transfers as a tool of social policy. Economic and political weekly. 2011; 61-66.
  • Mihir Shah. Direct cash transfers: no magic bullet. Economic and Political Weekly. 2008; 77-79.
  • Dilip Mookherjee, Debraj Ray. A dynamic incentive-based argument for conditional transfers. Economic record. 2008; 84(s1), 1-21.
  • Sarah Baird, Ephraim Chirwa, Craig McIntosh, Berk Ozler. The short-term impacts of a schooling conditional cash transfer program on the sexual behavior of young women. Health economics. 2010; 9(S1), 55-68.
  • Puja Dutta, Stephen Howes, Rinku Murgai. Small but effective: India’s targeted unconditional cash transfers. ASARC Working Paper. 2010, 1-21.

Abstract Views: 424

PDF Views: 222




  • A Critical Analysis of Direct Benefit Transfer in India

Abstract Views: 424  |  PDF Views: 222

Authors

Justin Joy
Department of Economics, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India

Abstract


Objectives: To critically evaluate direct benefit transfer mission in India, in terms of Aadhaar Card linkages, seeded bank accounts and in light of global experience. The paper also takes an account of the inflationary pressures that unconditional cash transfers may bring in to the system.

Methods: This is more of a descriptive study. Literature related to the study is critically approached and a few facts and figure that are officially released by direct benefit transfer mission of India has been used for the better understanding for the period 2013-2017.

Findings: From the analysis it is evident that by the time the Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) system has been introduced in 2013, 5.68 crore beneficiaries were not holding an Aadhaar and the number became 8.36 crore in 2017. In 2017 only 29.01 % of fund transfer has been done through Aadhaar seeded bank accounts. Therefore even though Direct Benefit Transfer system is an innovative and efficient system, India was not prepared to take it up. So serious efforts of government is required in the grass ischolar_main level by providing Aadhaar and Aadhaar bridge payment assistance to the common people.

Application: Continuous evaluation is required to ensure that no beneficiaries have denied their services in name of Aadhaar bridge payments. They must be given enough time and support considering India’s depth and breadth in size and its poor literacy level among poor people. A study in the future when more data is available about the implementation of direct benefit transfer, can tell more systematically about the success and failures of the programme in India.


Keywords


Conditional Versus Unconditional Benefit Transfers, Direct Benefit Transfers, Aadhaar Bridge Payments, Aadhaar Seeded Bank Accounts.

References