Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of Intermittent Leather Based on Image Score Pattern


Affiliations
1 Knowledge Portfolio Management Division, CSIR-Central Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Chennai 600 020, India
2 Department of Computer Science, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600 025, India
 

The process of intermittent leather inspection is being predominantly carried out with the support of human intervention based on homogenous distribution of colors. However, results of the observations between one experts to another expert may be different in opinion. Therefore, to emphasis some sort of supporting hand to the experts while taking decision, the authors have introduced an algorithm based on Image Score Pattern to distinguish between defect versus non-defect intermittent leather images. About 32 features generated from Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix, Simple Linear Iterative Clustering and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering from the training and testing datasets of about 1132 and 404 generated. The results of the classifier Support Vector Machine has confirmed the accuracy of 84% for the proposed Image Score Pattern method for these datasets. Similarly, other performance measures such as Precision, Recall, F1-Score, Specificity and Error Rate are also confirming that proposed method is performing in aligning of intermittent leather.

Keywords

Intermittent Leather, Image Score Pattern, Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix, Simple Linear Iterative Clustering, Support Vector Machine.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • MascianĂ  P, World statistical compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear, (2015).
  • http://leatherindia.org/industry-at-a-glance (11 May 2019).
  • Vasagam S, Madhan B, Chandrasekaran B and Rao J R, J Am Leather Chem Assoc, 108 (2013) 210.
  • Poelzleitner, W &Niel A, In Machine Vision Applications, Architectures, and Systems Integration, 2347 (1994) 50.
  • Georgieva, L, Krastev, K and Angelov, N, In CompSys Tech, 3 (2003) 303.
  • Viana Roberto, Ricardo B Rodrigues, Marco A Alvarez, and Hemerson Pistori, In Pacific-Rim symposium on image and video Technology (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), (2007).
  • Villar P, Mora M, Gonzalez P, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), (2011).
  • Shivashankar S and Madhuri R Kagale, Int J Comput Appl, 180 (2018) 34.
  • Pereira, R F, Medeiros, C M and Rebouças Filho, P P, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, (IEEE), (2018).
  • Jawahar, M and Vani, K, J.Am Leather Chem Assoc, 114 (2019).
  • Liong, Sze-Teng, ArXiv abs/1903.12139 (2019).
  • Aslam, M, Khan, T M, Naqvi, S S, Holmes, G and Naffa, R, IEEE Access, 7 (2019) 176065.
  • Amorim, W P, Pistori, H, Pereira, M C and Jacinto, M A C, IEEE, (2010) 353.
  • Baxes, G A, Digital Image Processing Principles and Applications, (Wiley), (2005).
  • Ekstrom M P, Digital Image Processing Techniques, (Academic Press), (2012).
  • Yang X, Teng G, Zhao H, Li G, An P and Wang G, International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, (IEEE), (2014).
  • Wang X and Bu J, Digital Signal Processing, 20 (2010) 1173.
  • Sivakumar R, Gayathri M and Nedumaran D, Conference on Open Systems, (IEEE), 2010.
  • Hsu C and Wu J, Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 45 (1998) 1097.
  • Basu M, IEEE Tran. Syst Man Cybern, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 32 (2002) 252.
  • Bao P, Zhang L, and Wu X, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 27 (2005) 1485.
  • Wang X, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 29 (2007) 886.
  • Taneja A, Ranjan P and Ujjlayan, International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization, (IEEE), (2015).
  • Patel J M and Gamit N C, International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking, (IEEE), 2016.
  • Lin P T, and Lin B R, IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications, (IEEE), 2016.
  • Zhang F, Du B and Zhang L, IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 54 (2015) 1793.
  • Xia L, Meng J, Xu R, Yan B and Guo Y, IEEE Microw Wirel Compon, (2006).
  • Ahmad I, Basheri M, Iqbal M J and Rahim, IEEE Access, 6 (2018) 33789.
  • Haghighi S, Jasemi M, Hessabi S and Zolanvari A, J Open Source Softw, 3 (2018) 729.

Abstract Views: 81

PDF Views: 67




  • Assessment of Intermittent Leather Based on Image Score Pattern

Abstract Views: 81  |  PDF Views: 67

Authors

S. Nithiyanantha Vasagam
Knowledge Portfolio Management Division, CSIR-Central Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Chennai 600 020, India
M. Sornam
Department of Computer Science, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600 025, India

Abstract


The process of intermittent leather inspection is being predominantly carried out with the support of human intervention based on homogenous distribution of colors. However, results of the observations between one experts to another expert may be different in opinion. Therefore, to emphasis some sort of supporting hand to the experts while taking decision, the authors have introduced an algorithm based on Image Score Pattern to distinguish between defect versus non-defect intermittent leather images. About 32 features generated from Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix, Simple Linear Iterative Clustering and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering from the training and testing datasets of about 1132 and 404 generated. The results of the classifier Support Vector Machine has confirmed the accuracy of 84% for the proposed Image Score Pattern method for these datasets. Similarly, other performance measures such as Precision, Recall, F1-Score, Specificity and Error Rate are also confirming that proposed method is performing in aligning of intermittent leather.

Keywords


Intermittent Leather, Image Score Pattern, Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix, Simple Linear Iterative Clustering, Support Vector Machine.

References