Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Optimization on Manufacturing Processes at Indian Industries Using TOPSIS


Affiliations
1 Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India
2 Division of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Jalandhar 144402, India
3 Department of Medical Physics, Hilla University College, Babylon 51001, Iraq
 

Evaluation and optimization of multi-criteria with multiple alternatives have been essential activities for decision-making process. TOPSIS (Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique, has been adopted in the past for research & decision-making and ranking of alternatives by optimizing input parameters to get the maximum overall output from the system. This study aims to explore the context, reasons, and particular advantages of using TOPSIS in the materials science and engineering field for realizing goals of competitive supply chains (SCs). This study has reviewed and analyzed research papers from the approach of systematic review of the literature. This study has presented a conceptual framework to emphasize the antecedents and consequences of using the TOPSIS methodology for output optimization in the materials science and engineering industry that can improve the competitiveness of SCs. This study found that TOPSIS based methodologies have been used in eleven types of industries in India, indicating the prowess of TOPSIS methodology. The results of TOPSIS have compared very well with other MCDM methods that are relatively more difficult and cumbersome. This study will help the engineers, practitioners, academicians, researchers, and SC managers with the application approach of TOPSIS for output optimization in various fields.

Keywords

Engineering, MCDM, Materials, Manufacturing, TOPSIS.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Kumar V, Singh B, Himanshu, Chandel S, & Singhal P, Mater Today Proc, (2020) 1449.
  • Singhal P, & Agrawal M, IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 988 (2020) 012075.
  • Chakladar ND, & Chakraborty S, Proc Inst Mech Eng , Part B J Eng Manuf, 222 (2008) 1613.
  • Kumar S, & Dvivedi A, Mater Sci Semicond Process, 102 (2019) 1.
  • Adalarasan R, & Shanmuga Sundaram A, J Chinese Inst Eng, 39 (2016) 484.
  • Singh B, Sharma S, Kumar V, Maheshwari K, & Singhal P, IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 1116 (2021) 012080.
  • Kulshreshtha A, Gupta SK, & Singhal P, Mater Today Proc, 26 (2020) 1638.
  • Kamble AG, Gupta S, Trivedi B, & Jangale P, Int J Manuf Technol Manag, 26 (2012) 39.
  • Raju SS, & Murali GB, J Reinf Plast Compos, 39 (2020) 721.
  • Diyaley S, Shilal P, Shivakoti I, Ghadai RK, & Kalita K, Period Polytech Mech Eng, 61 (2017) 255.
  • Saravanan KG, Thanigaivela RN, & Soundarrajan M, Bull Polish Acad Sci Tech Sci, 69 (2021) 1.
  • Deb M, Debbarma B, Majumder A, & Banerjee R, Energy, 117 (2016) 281.
  • Singh S, Agrawal V, & Mohanty RP, J Adv Manag Res, 19 (2022) 414.
  • Naik SS, Rana J, & Nanda P, Int J Mech Eng Technol, 9 (2018) 1083.
  • Tripathy S, & Tripathy DK, Mach Sci Technol, 21 (2017) 362.
  • Gupta MK, Sood PK, Singh G, & Sharma VS., Int J Mater Prod Technol, 57 (2018) 299.
  • Muniappan AS, Veerabhadrarao SK, Jayakumar V, Thiagarajan C, & Arunagiri A, Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev, 8 (2018) 138.
  • Ramalingam A, & Muthuvel S, Int J Manuf Mater Mech Eng, 7 (2017) 19.
  • Manivannan R, & Kumar MP, Mater Manuf Process, 32 (2017) 209.
  • Parthiban K, Duraiselvam M, & Manivannan R, Opt Laser Technol, 102 (2018) 32.
  • Mandal P, & Chandra S, Measurement, 169 (2021) 1.
  • Goyal KK, Jain PK, & Jain M, Int J Prod Res, 50 (2012) 4175.
  • Kumar M, Indian J Eng Mater Sci, 27 (2020) 300.
  • Rana R, Walia RS, & Murtaza Q, Coatings, 11 (2021) 760.
  • Sen B, Abou S, Hussain I, Mia M, Mandal UK, & Mondal SP, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 103 (2019) 1811.
  • Panwar A, Kumar R, Thakur R, Goel B, Rana A, Pathania A, et al., Int J Emerg Technol, 11 (2020) 178.
  • Vivekh P, Sudhakar M, Srinivas M, Vishwanthkumar V, & Campus H, Int J Low-Carbon Technol, (2016) 1.
  • Senthilkumar C, Int J Mach Mach Mater, 21 (2019) 480.
  • Vinodh S, Thiagarajan A, & Mulanjur G, Int J Serv Oper Manag, 18 (2014) 342.
  • Shukla A, Agarwal P, Rana RS, & Purohit R, Mater Today Proc, 4 (2017) 5320.
  • Sharma A, Belokar RM, & Kumar S, Indian J Eng Mater Sci, 24 (2017) 437.
  • Magibalan, Subramaniam Senthilkumar, Palanisamy Senthilkumar C, & Prabu M, Indian J Eng Mater Sci, 27 (2020) 458.
  • Balasubramaniyan S, & Selvaraj T, J Chinese Inst Eng, 40 (2017) 267.
  • Subbaian V, Jacob KB, & Durairaj R, Indian J Eng Mater Sci, 27 (2020) 424.
  • Prakash DB, Krishnaiah G, & Shankar NVS, Int J Mech Eng Technol, 7 (2016) 483.
  • R. SM, & S. V, Rapid Prototyp J, 27 (2021) 155.
  • Joshi R, Banwet DK, & Shankar R, Expert Syst Appl, 38 (2011) 10170.
  • Palanisamy D, & Senthil P, Arch Mech Eng, 63 (2016) 397.
  • Ramesh S, Viswanathan R, & Ambika S, Measurement, 78 (2016) 63.
  • Joshi G, Singh S, & Vig R, J Vis Commun Image Represent, 71 (2020) .
  • Arunramnath R, Thyla PR, Mahendrakumar N, Ramesh M, & Aravind S, Mater Manuf Process, 34 (2019) 530.
  • Kumar A, & Gulati V, Indian J Eng Mater Sci, 27 (2020) 246.
  • Tamizharasan T, & Barnabas JK, Indian J Eng Mater Sci, 21 (2014) 543.
  • Chakraborty S, & Chatterjee P, J Inst Eng Ser E, 98 (2017) 79.
  • Patra P, & Angira M, Trans Electr Electron Mater, 21 (2019) 157.
  • Khan I, & Rahman Z, Int Strateg Manag Rev, 3 (2015) 1.
  • Tranfield D, Denyer D, & Smart P, Br J Manag, 14 (2003) 207.
  • Joshi Y, & Rahman Z, Int Strateg Manag Rev, 3 (2015) 128.
  • Praveenkumar S, & Sankarasubramanian G, J Build Pathol Rehabil, 6 (2021) .
  • Deshmukh D, & Angira M, Trans Electr Electron Mater, 20 (2019) 181.
  • Kumar D, & Mondal S, Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng, 8 (2019) 3306.
  • Majumdar A, Sarkar B, & Majumdar PK, J Text Inst, 96 (2005) 303.
  • Choudhary D, & Shankar R, Energy, 42 (2012) 510.
  • Sakthivel G, Ilangkumaran M, & Gaikwad A, Ain Shams Eng J, 6 (2015) 239.
  • Chauhan R, Singh T, Tiwari A, Patnaik A, & Thakur NS, Energy, 134 (2017) 360.
  • Thakur R, Kumar S, Kashyap K, Kumar A, & Aggarwal S, Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng, 9 (2019) 2418.
  • Baranitharan P, Ramesh K, & Sakthivel R, J Clean Prod, 234 (2019) 315.
  • Sasikumar G, & Ayyappan S, J Inst Eng Ser C, 100 (2019) 707.
  • Lionus LGM, Subramani S, & Sundaraganesan A, Trans Famena, 43 (2019) 83.
  • Muqeem M, Sherwani AF, Ahmad M, & Khan ZA, Int J Heavy Veh Syst, 26 (2019) 69.
  • Ganesh Kumar P, Meikandan M, Sakthivadivel D, & Vigneswaran V. S, Int J Ambient Energy, (2018) 1.
  • Athawale VM, & Chakraborty S, J Inst Eng (India), Part PR Prod Eng Div, 90 (2010) 8.
  • Gholap AB, & Jaybhaye MD, Int J Eng Adv Technol, 8 (2019) 495.
  • Mohammed R, Reddy BR, Sridhar K, & Manoj A, Int J Recent Technol Eng, 8 (2019) 3118.
  • Li N, Sheikh-ahmad JY, El-sinawi A, & Krishnaraj V, Measurement, 132 (2019) 252.
  • Kumar J, & Verma RK, FME Trans, 48 (2020) 628.
  • Santhi M, Ravikumar R, & Jeyapaul R, Multidiscip Model Mater Struct, 9 (2013) 243.
  • Routara BC, Bhuyan RK, & Parida AK, Int J Manuf Mater Mech Eng, 4 (2014) 49.
  • Senthil P, Vinodh S, & Singh AK, Int J Mach Mach Mater, 16 (2014) 80.
  • Elango V, & Jegadheesan C, Int J Appl Eng Res, 10 (2015) 44092.
  • Yuvaraj N, & Pradeep Kumar M, Mater Manuf Process, 30 (2015) 882.
  • Singaravel B, & Selvaraj T, Teh Vjesn - Tech Gaz, 22 (2015) 1475.
  • Santhiand M, & Mohamed F, Int J Appl Eng Res, 10 (2015) 3797.
  • Tripathy S, & Tripathy DK, Eng Sci Technol an Int J, 19 (2016) 62.
  • Manivannan R, & Kumar MP, J Mech Sci Technol, 30 (2016) 137.
  • Raj SON, & Prabhu S, Int J Mach Mach Mater, 19 (2017) 76.
  • Gopal PM, & Soorya Prakash K, Meas J Int Meas Confed, 116 (2018) 178.
  • Gobinath R, & Hariharan P, J Balk Tribol Assoc, 24 (2018) 796.
  • Pradhan MK, & Tiwari A, Int J Mach Mach Mater, 20 (2018) 513.
  • Pradhan MK, Int J Ind Syst Eng, 29 (2018) 273.
  • Ramakrishnan H, Balasundaram R, Selvaganapathy P, Santhakumari M, Sivasankaran P, & Vignesh P, SN Appl Sci, 1 (2019) .
  • Sharma N, Khan ZA, Siddiquee AN, & Wahid MA, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci, 0 (2019) 1.
  • Pradeep N, Sundaram SK, & Pradeep Kumar M, J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng, 47 (2019) .
  • Shukla S, & Shukla H, Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng, 8 (2019) 1315.
  • Kumar D, Protim PP, Chakraborty S, Sharma A, & Swain BP, J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng, 41 (2019) 1.
  • Ananthakumar K, Rajamani D, Balasubramanian E, & Davim JP, Measurement, 135 (2019) 725.
  • Reddy VV, Krishna MG, & Reddy KS, J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst, 11 (2019) 42.
  • Sharma V, Int J Eng Trends Technol, 68 (2020) 37.
  • Natarajan H, Paramasivam SSSS, Kumaran D, Balakumaran G, & Naveen R, Int J Veh Struct Syst, 12 (2020) 388.
  • Dey A, Shrivastav M, & Kumar P, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf, 235 (2021) 2174.
  • Khadar BS, Jagannadha RM V., & Murahari K, Stroj Cas - J Mech Eng, 71 (2021) 1.
  • Kolli M, Prasad AVSR, & Naresh DS, SN Appl Sci, 3 (2021).
  • Banik A, Saha A, Barma JD, Acharya U, & Saha C, Measurement, (2021) .
  • Bodukuri AK, & Kesha E, Int J Adv Technol Eng Explor, 8 (2021) 735.
  • Praveen V, Raju R, & Raju J, Int J Mod Manuf Technol, 13 (2021) 149.
  • Kumar D, & Mondal S, Int J Mod Manuf Technol, 13 (2021) 84.
  • Umamaheswarrao P, Rangaraju D, & Suman KNS, INCAS Bull, 13 (2021) 211.

Abstract Views: 91

PDF Views: 58




  • Optimization on Manufacturing Processes at Indian Industries Using TOPSIS

Abstract Views: 91  |  PDF Views: 58

Authors

Satbir Singh
Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India
Vivek Agrawal
Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India
Kuldeep Kr Saxena
Division of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Jalandhar 144402, India
Kahtan A Mohammed
Department of Medical Physics, Hilla University College, Babylon 51001, Iraq

Abstract


Evaluation and optimization of multi-criteria with multiple alternatives have been essential activities for decision-making process. TOPSIS (Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique, has been adopted in the past for research & decision-making and ranking of alternatives by optimizing input parameters to get the maximum overall output from the system. This study aims to explore the context, reasons, and particular advantages of using TOPSIS in the materials science and engineering field for realizing goals of competitive supply chains (SCs). This study has reviewed and analyzed research papers from the approach of systematic review of the literature. This study has presented a conceptual framework to emphasize the antecedents and consequences of using the TOPSIS methodology for output optimization in the materials science and engineering industry that can improve the competitiveness of SCs. This study found that TOPSIS based methodologies have been used in eleven types of industries in India, indicating the prowess of TOPSIS methodology. The results of TOPSIS have compared very well with other MCDM methods that are relatively more difficult and cumbersome. This study will help the engineers, practitioners, academicians, researchers, and SC managers with the application approach of TOPSIS for output optimization in various fields.

Keywords


Engineering, MCDM, Materials, Manufacturing, TOPSIS.

References