Open Access
Subscription Access
Tensile Behaviour of Natural Polymer Composite Materials at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures
The behaviour of materials can change significantly when they are exposed to high temperatures. Therefore, it is essential to understand how materials perform under elevated temperature conditions before recommending them for applications that involve exposure to high temperatures. The present work describes the preparation of composite materials using natural biodegradable waste materials such as groundnut shell powder and teak wood powder as reinforcement phases for a polyester matrix. The composites were tested for their mechanical properties such as tensile modulus, tensile strength, and percent of elongation, as well as their thermal conductivity at room temperature. Later, using the simulation studies, the experimental behaviour of natural composites at room temperature was validated and further extended to find the same composite behaviour at elevated temperatures. From the current studies, it is identified that teak wood powder reinforced composites experienced more stress than the ground nut shell powder reinforced composites at the selected elevated temperatures, such as 50 °C, 80 °C, 100 °C, 120 °C, and 150 °C respectively. At room temperature, the teak wood powder reinforced composites had a 60% higher tensile modulus, 97% higher tensile strength, and 12.5% greater thermal conductivity than the GNSP composite under similar particle loading, hosting medium, and environmental conditions.
Keywords
Biodegradable Composite, Ground Nutshell, Wood Powder, Finite Element Method, Elevated Temperatures, Equivalent Stresses.
User
Font Size
Information
- Vickers N, J Curr Biol, 54 (2016) 62.
- Malladi R, Nagalakshmaiah M, Robert M & Elkoun S, ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 6 (2018) 2807.
- Nemaleu JGD, Belela EA, Nana A, Kaze RC, Venyite P, Yanou RN & Kamseu, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 29 (2022) 449.
- Malkapuram R, Kumar V & Negi YS, J Reinf Plast Compos, 28 (2009) 1169.
- Ouagne P, Bizet L, Baley C & Bréard J, J Compos Mater, 44 (2010)1201.
- Manalo AC, Wani E, Zukarnain NA, Karunasena W& Lau KT, Compos B Eng, 80 (2015) 73.
- Nakamura R, Goda K, Noda J & Ohgi J, J Express Polym Lett, 3 (2009) 19.
- Keya KN, Kona NA, Koly FA, Maraz K M, Islam MN & Khan RA, Mater Eng Res,14 (2019)1494.
- Tahir PM, Ahmed AB, SaifulAzry SO & Ahmed Z Bioresour, 6 (2011).
- Khan MZ, Srivastava SK Gupta MK, Polym Test, 89 (2020) 106721.
- Poletto M, Zattera AJ, Forte MM & Santana RM, Bioresour Technol, 109 (2012) 148.
- Dan-Asabe B, J King Saud Univ Eng Sci, 30 (2018) 296.
- Sundarababu J, Anandan SS & Griskevicius P, Mater. Today, 39 (4) (2021)1241.
- Awasthi A, Saxena KK & Arun V, Mater Today, 44, (2021) 2069.
- Bandhu D, Kumari S, Prajapati V, Saxena KK & Abhishek K Mater Manuf, 36 (2021)1524.
- Agarwal KM, Tyagi RK & Saxena KK, Adv Materb Process, 8(2022) 828.
- Sharma SK Saxena KK, Mater Today Proc, 56 (2022) 2278.
- Dhawan A, Gupta N, Goyal R & Saxena KK, Mater Today 44 (2021)17.
- Ichazo MN, Albano C, Gonzalez J, Perera R & Candal AM, Compos Struct, 54 (2001) 207.
- Prasanthi P, Kondapalli SB, Morampudi NKSR, Vallabhaneni VVM, Saxena KK, Mohammed KA & Buddhi D, Mater 15(2022) 7032.
- Nagaraja Ganesh B & Rekha B, Arch Civ Mech, 20 (4) (2020) 1.
- Jain NK & Gupta MK, Mater Res Express 5(12) (2018) 125306.
- Raju GU & Kumarappa SJ, Reinf Plast Compos 30(2011) 1029.
- Madhav VV, Chaitanya CS, Prasanthi PP, Gupta AV SSKS, Spandana VV, Saxena KK & Prakash C, Interact Des Manuf, (2022) 1.
- Kumar PSS & Allamraju KV, Mater Today (18) (2019) 2556.
- Budarapu PR, YB SS & Natarajan R Front. Struct. Civ, (10) (2016) 394.
- Sudhir Sastry YB, Krishna Y & Budarapu PR, Comput Mater, 96 (2015) 416.
Abstract Views: 153
PDF Views: 83