Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Electrical Properties of Gamma-rays Exposed 1D Nanostructures


Affiliations
1 Department of Physics, Aggarwal College Ballabgarh, Faridabad 121004, India
2 National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra 136 119, India
3 Manav Rachna International Institute of Research & Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad 121 004, India
 

Electrical properties of matter has a very significant role in characterization of a particular material to utilize it for device applications. One-dimensional nanostructures play an important role as interconnects in nanoscale based electronic devices. Hence, the flow of electric current is a very significant parameter to control the quality of electronic device. The electrical conductivity of nanomaterials is found to vary with diameter of 1D nanostructures. However, keeping the diameter of 1D nanostructures constant, and exposing them to radiations can also cause reduction in their electrical conductivity. In present work, we analyzed the consequence of gamma rays induced variation in current voltage characteristics and hence the electrical conductivity of 1D silver and zinc nanostructures. We synthesized the 1D silver and zinc nanostructures via TEMs and exposed them to gamma radioactive Cobalt-60 source. In the post exposure cases, I-V characteristics (IVC) are found to be severely affected that indicates the dampening of electronic flow across nano-needles. And around 2 Volts of applied potential difference, electronic flow across 1D nanostructures approaches to zero, however, a little variation in the potential is observed in different cases of irradiation with no specific pattern.

Keywords

Electrical Conductivity, Gamma Rays, Silver Nanowires, Structural Modification, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD).
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Monson C F& Wooley A T, Nano Lett. 3 (2003) 359.

  • Wilms M, Conard J, Vasilev K, Kreiter M & Wegner G, Appl Surf Sci 238 (2004) 490.

  • Cheng C & Hayine D T, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 (2005) 263112.

  • Vargiamidis V & Petsos G, Mat Sci and Eng B 69-70 (2000) 449.

  • Choi D S, Rheem Y, Yoo B, Myung N V & Kim Y K, Curr Appl Phy 10 (2010) 1037.

  • Lee W, Kang M G, Kim B S, Hong B H, Whang D & Hwang S W, Scripta Materialia 63 (2010) 1009.

  • Karim S, Ensinger W, Cornelius T W & Neumann R, Physica E 40 (2008) 3173.

  • Picaud F, Pouthier V, Giraadet C & Tosatti E, Surf Sci 547 (2003) 249.

  • Stella L, Santoro G E, Fabrizio M & Tosatti E, Surf Sci 566-568 (2004) 430.

  • Callister W D, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering, 2nd ed. Wiley & Sons, pp. 252.

  • Doherty R D, Hughes D A, Humphreys F J, Jonas J J, Jensen D J, Kassner M E, King W E, McNelley T R, McQueen H J & Rollett A D, Mat Sci Eng A 238 (1997) 219.

  • Paroni R, Journal of Elasticity 60 (2000) 19.

  • Cheng Y Q, Chen Z H, Xia W J, J Mater Science 42 (2007) 3552.

  • Shakai T, Furushima T, Manabe K, Morimoto H & Nakamachi E, JSME Internaional Journal series A 49 (2006) 216.

  • Kavakita M, Kawakita J & Sakka Y, J Nanopart Res 12 (2010) 2621.

  • N. Hansen, X. Huang and G. Winther, Metallur Materials Trans A (2010)

  • Valiev R Z, Murashkin M Y, Semenova I P, Metallur Materials Trans A 41 (2010) 816.

  • Cress C D, Christopher M S, Landi B J, Messenger S R, Raffaelle R P & Walters R J, J. Appl. Phys. 107 (2010) 014316.

  • Ding Y, Cui Y, Liu X, Liu G & Shan F, Applied Materials Today 20 (2020) 100634.

  • Wu C, He C, Guo D, Zhang F, Lic P, Wang S, Liu A, Wu F, Tang W, Materials Today Physics, 12 (2020) 100193.

  • Razaghi Z, Xie D Y, Lin M, Zhu G, RSC Adv. 12 (2022) 5577.

  • Mai L, Yang F, Zhao Y, Xu X, Xu L, Hu B, Luo Y & Liu H, Materials Today 14 (2011) 346.

  • Kwon Y J, Kang S Y, Wu P, Peng Y, Kim S S & Kim H W, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 8 (2016), 13646.

  • Shani L, Fried A, Fleger Y, Girshevitz O, Sharoni A & Yeshurun Y, J Supercond Nov Magn 35 (2022) 657.

  • Huczko A, Appl. Phys. A 70 (2000) 365. 26 Gehlawat D, Chauhan R P, Sonkawade R G, Sci Adv Mat 4 (2012) 1134.

  • Chakarvarti S K, Radiation Measurements 44 (2009) 1085.

  • Gehlawat D, Chauhan R P, Sonkawade R G & Chakarvarti S K, Appl Phy A 106 (2012) 157.

  • Panchal S & Chauhan R P, Physica E: Low dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 87 (2017) 37.

  • Cullity B D, Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, Addison- Wesley publishing comp. pp 139.

  • Barret C & Massalski T B, Structure of Metals, Petgamon, Oxford (1980), pp 1923.

  • Harris G B, Phil. Mag., 43 (1952) 113.

  • Cornelius T W, Brotz J, Chtanko N, Dobrev D, Miehe G, Newmann R & Toimil Molares M E, Nanotechnology 16 (2005) S246.

  • Kumar N, Kumar R, Kumar S, & Chakarvarti S K, Radiation Physics and Chemistry 119 (2016) 44.

  • Chauhan R P & Rana P, Radiation Measurements 83 (2015) 43.

  • Wechsler M S & Murty K L, Metallurl Trans Av, 20A (1989) 2637.

  • Fukuya K, Nakano M, Fujii K & Torimaru T, J Nucl Sci Tech 41 (2004) 594. 38 Mayadas A F, Shatzkes M, Phys. Rew. B 1 (1970) 1382.

  • Fuches K, In Proceedings of the Cambridge Philos. Soc.34 (1938) 100.


Abstract Views: 49

PDF Views: 31




  • Electrical Properties of Gamma-rays Exposed 1D Nanostructures

Abstract Views: 49  |  PDF Views: 31

Authors

Devender Gehlawat
Department of Physics, Aggarwal College Ballabgarh, Faridabad 121004, India
R. P. Chauhan
National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra 136 119, India
K. Kant
Department of Physics, Aggarwal College Ballabgarh, Faridabad 121004, India
S. K. Chakarvarti
Manav Rachna International Institute of Research & Studies (MRIIRS), Faridabad 121 004, India

Abstract


Electrical properties of matter has a very significant role in characterization of a particular material to utilize it for device applications. One-dimensional nanostructures play an important role as interconnects in nanoscale based electronic devices. Hence, the flow of electric current is a very significant parameter to control the quality of electronic device. The electrical conductivity of nanomaterials is found to vary with diameter of 1D nanostructures. However, keeping the diameter of 1D nanostructures constant, and exposing them to radiations can also cause reduction in their electrical conductivity. In present work, we analyzed the consequence of gamma rays induced variation in current voltage characteristics and hence the electrical conductivity of 1D silver and zinc nanostructures. We synthesized the 1D silver and zinc nanostructures via TEMs and exposed them to gamma radioactive Cobalt-60 source. In the post exposure cases, I-V characteristics (IVC) are found to be severely affected that indicates the dampening of electronic flow across nano-needles. And around 2 Volts of applied potential difference, electronic flow across 1D nanostructures approaches to zero, however, a little variation in the potential is observed in different cases of irradiation with no specific pattern.

Keywords


Electrical Conductivity, Gamma Rays, Silver Nanowires, Structural Modification, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD).

References