Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Investment Behavior of Secondary Equity Investors : An Examination of the Relationship Among the Biases


Affiliations
1 Research Associate, Loyola Institute of Business Administration, Loyola College, Chennai - 600 034, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Director, Loyola Institute of Business Administration, Loyola College, Chennai - 600 034, Tamil Nadu

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Behavioral finance attempts to explain the emotions in the stock market which lead to anomalous stock market behavior. Behavioral biases exhibited by the investors explain their irrational decision making. Knowledge about the interaction among the biases would help to comprehend the investors' financial personality better. Using a dataset of 436 secondary equity investors residing in Chennai, this study measured eight behavioral biases on a Likert scale through a questionnaire survey. The biases studied included mental accounting, anchoring, gambler's fallacy, availability, loss aversion, regret aversion, representativeness, and overconfidence. Significant relationships among the behavioral biases were documented in the study. The biases: (a) overconfidence, regret aversion, and anchoring biases; (b) loss aversion and anchoring; (c) representativeness, gambler's fallacy, and mental accounting; (d) mental accounting and availability biases exhibited by the secondary equity investors were found to be interrelated. Hence, the financial advisors could improve their advice and recommend guidelines to the investors based on the biases they are likely to exhibit.

Keywords

Behavioral Finance, Behavioral Biases, Mental Accounting, Anchoring, Gambler's Fallacy, Availability, Loss Aversion, Regret Aversion, Representativeness, Overconfidence, Secondary Equity Market, Equity Investors' Behavior

JEL Classification: D91, G11, G41

Paper Submission Date : May 18, 2018 ; Paper sent back for Revision : August 14, 2018 ; Paper Acceptance Date : August 19, 2018

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 218

PDF Views: 0




  • Investment Behavior of Secondary Equity Investors : An Examination of the Relationship Among the Biases

Abstract Views: 218  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

R. Renu Isidore
Research Associate, Loyola Institute of Business Administration, Loyola College, Chennai - 600 034, Tamil Nadu, India
P. Christie
Director, Loyola Institute of Business Administration, Loyola College, Chennai - 600 034, Tamil Nadu

Abstract


Behavioral finance attempts to explain the emotions in the stock market which lead to anomalous stock market behavior. Behavioral biases exhibited by the investors explain their irrational decision making. Knowledge about the interaction among the biases would help to comprehend the investors' financial personality better. Using a dataset of 436 secondary equity investors residing in Chennai, this study measured eight behavioral biases on a Likert scale through a questionnaire survey. The biases studied included mental accounting, anchoring, gambler's fallacy, availability, loss aversion, regret aversion, representativeness, and overconfidence. Significant relationships among the behavioral biases were documented in the study. The biases: (a) overconfidence, regret aversion, and anchoring biases; (b) loss aversion and anchoring; (c) representativeness, gambler's fallacy, and mental accounting; (d) mental accounting and availability biases exhibited by the secondary equity investors were found to be interrelated. Hence, the financial advisors could improve their advice and recommend guidelines to the investors based on the biases they are likely to exhibit.

Keywords


Behavioral Finance, Behavioral Biases, Mental Accounting, Anchoring, Gambler's Fallacy, Availability, Loss Aversion, Regret Aversion, Representativeness, Overconfidence, Secondary Equity Market, Equity Investors' Behavior

JEL Classification: D91, G11, G41

Paper Submission Date : May 18, 2018 ; Paper sent back for Revision : August 14, 2018 ; Paper Acceptance Date : August 19, 2018




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf%2F2018%2Fv12i9%2F131556