Indian Journal of Finance

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Information Content in Bonus Issue Announcements : Evidence from the Indian Corporate Sector


Affiliations
1 University School of Applied Management, Punjabi University Patiala, Patiala - 147 002, Punjab & Inspector Audit, Punjab Cooperation Department, Chandigarh, India
2 University School of Applied Management, Punjabi University Patiala, Patiala - 147 002, Punjab, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The bonus issue has remained the center of attraction among researchers within the finance literature due to its puzzling nature. This study tried to revalidate two hypotheses namely, information signalling hypothesis and liquidity hypothesis in the Indian stock market in context of bonus issue announcements. Price reaction and trading volume on and around the announcement as well as ex-date were investigated during the study period (2004 – 2016). The study also measured the market depth through augmented liquidity tests around these two dates. The findings of the study observed significant positive abnormal reaction on the day of announcement as well as ex-bonus date. The presence of significant positive abnormal reaction in the pre-announcement period indicated the existence of insider trading and/or information leakages. The significant negative price reaction observed during the post ex-bonus day indicated the presence of bonus stripping practices in the study period. The study observed abnormally high trading volume around the announcement date and the ex-bonus date. The augmented liquidity tests, that is, stock’s trading volume, stock’s relative trading volume, and liquidity ratio revealed that stocks traded on NSE experienced enhanced liquidity in the post bonus issue period. The empirical findings of the research were in line with the information signalling hypothesis and liquidity hypothesis.

Keywords

Bonus Issues, Stock Dividends, Signalling, Liquidity, Announcement Date.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adaoglu, C., & Lasfer, M. A. (2003). Why do companies pay stock dividends ? The case of bonus distributions in an inflationary environment. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 38(5-6), 601– 627.

  • Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 223 – 249.

  • Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., & Lauterbach, B. (1997). Market microstructure and securities values : Evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 365 – 390.

  • Anderson, H., Cahan, S., & Rose, L. C. (2001). Stock dividend announcement effects in an imputation tax environment. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(5 – 6), 653 – 669.

  • Baker, H. K., & Phillips, A. L. (1993). Why companies issue stock dividends. Financial Practice and Education, 3(2), 29 – 37.

  • Balachandran, B., Faff, R., & Jong, L. (2005). Announcements of bonus share options : Signalling of the quality of firms. Global Finance Journal, 16(2), 180 – 190.

  • Ball, R., Brown, P., & Finn, F. J. (1977). Share capitalization changes, information, and the Australian equity market. Australian Journal of Management, 2(2), 105 – 125.

  • Barker, C. A. (1958). Evaluation of stock dividends. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 99 – 114.

  • Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns : The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3 – 31.

  • Conroy, R. M., Harris, R. S., & Benet, B. A. (1990). The effects of stock splits on bid - ask spreads. The Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1285 – 1295.

  • Cooper, S. K., Groth, J. C., & Avera, W. E. (1985). Liquidity, exchange listing, and common stock performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 37(1), 19 – 33.

  • Copeland, T. E. (1979). Liquidity changes following stock splits. The Journal of Finance, 34(1), 115 – 141.

  • Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review, 10(1), 1 – 21.

  • Grinblatt, M. S., Masulis, R. W., & Titman, S. (1984). The valuation effects of stock splits and stock dividends. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(4), 461 – 490.

  • Joshipura, M. (2009). Price and liquidity effects of stock split : Empirical evidence from the Indian stock market. Indian Journal of Finance, 3(10), 22 – 31.

  • Lakonishok, J., & Lev, B. (1987). Stock splits and stock dividends: Why, who, and when. The Journal of Finance, 42(4), 913 – 932.

  • Lakonishok, J., & Vermaelen, T. (1986). Tax-induced trading around ex-dividend days. Journal of Financial Economics, 16(3), 287 – 319.

  • Lamoureux, C. G., & Poon, P. (1987). The market reaction to stock splits. The Journal of Finance, 42(5), 1347 – 1370.

  • Lukose, J., & Sapar, N. R. (2002). Does bonus issue signal superior profitability ? A study of the BSE listed firms. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.428122

  • MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13 – 39.

  • Malhotra, M., Thenmozhi, M., & Kumar, G. A. (2012). Evidence on changes in stock prices and liquidity around rights issue announcement: Industry specific analysis. International Journal of Business Insights and Transformation, 5(2), 1 – 32.

  • McNichols, M., & Dravid, A. (1990). Stock dividends, stock splits, and signalling. The Journal of Finance, 45(3), 857 – 879.

  • Miller, M., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business, 34(4), 411 – 433.

  • Mishra, A. (2005). An empirical analysis of market reaction around the bonus issue in India. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.733043

  • Murray, D. (1985). Further evidence on the liquidity effects of stock splits and stock Dividends. The Journal of Financial Research, 8(1), 59 – 68.

  • Muscarella, C. J., & Piwowar, M. S. (2001). Market microstructure and securities values : Evidence from the Paris Bourse. Journal of Financial Markets, 4(3), 209 – 229.

  • Nguyen, N. H., & Wang, D. Y. (2013). Stock dividends in China: Signalling or liquidity explanations ? Accounting & Finance, 53(2), 513 – 535.

  • Papaioannou, G. J., Travlos, N.G., & Tsangarakis, N.V. (2000). Valuation effects of Greek stock dividend distributions. European Financial Management, 6(4), 515 – 531.

  • Pradhan, S. K., & Kasilingam, R. (2018). Stock split announcements and their impact on shareholders' wealth: A study on the Indian stock market. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(10),46–61 . https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2018/v12i10/132499

  • Rao, K. C., & Geetha, T. (1996). Indian capital market: informational signalling and efficiency. New Delhi : APH Publishing Corporation.

  • Ray, K. K. (2011). Stock split and rights issue effect on Indian stock market : An empirical study. Indian Journal of Finance, 5(1), 17 – 25.

  • Woolridge, J. R. (1983). Stock dividends as signals. The Journal of Financial Research, 6(1), 1 – 12.


Abstract Views: 248

PDF Views: 0




  • The Information Content in Bonus Issue Announcements : Evidence from the Indian Corporate Sector

Abstract Views: 248  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Heena Basra
University School of Applied Management, Punjabi University Patiala, Patiala - 147 002, Punjab & Inspector Audit, Punjab Cooperation Department, Chandigarh, India
Ravi Singla
University School of Applied Management, Punjabi University Patiala, Patiala - 147 002, Punjab, India

Abstract


The bonus issue has remained the center of attraction among researchers within the finance literature due to its puzzling nature. This study tried to revalidate two hypotheses namely, information signalling hypothesis and liquidity hypothesis in the Indian stock market in context of bonus issue announcements. Price reaction and trading volume on and around the announcement as well as ex-date were investigated during the study period (2004 – 2016). The study also measured the market depth through augmented liquidity tests around these two dates. The findings of the study observed significant positive abnormal reaction on the day of announcement as well as ex-bonus date. The presence of significant positive abnormal reaction in the pre-announcement period indicated the existence of insider trading and/or information leakages. The significant negative price reaction observed during the post ex-bonus day indicated the presence of bonus stripping practices in the study period. The study observed abnormally high trading volume around the announcement date and the ex-bonus date. The augmented liquidity tests, that is, stock’s trading volume, stock’s relative trading volume, and liquidity ratio revealed that stocks traded on NSE experienced enhanced liquidity in the post bonus issue period. The empirical findings of the research were in line with the information signalling hypothesis and liquidity hypothesis.

Keywords


Bonus Issues, Stock Dividends, Signalling, Liquidity, Announcement Date.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf%2F2020%2Fv14i5-7%2F153322