Indian Journal of Finance

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Determinants of Audit Fee - Evidence from Indian Companies


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, School of Business and Management, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore - 560 029, India
2 Assistant Professor, School of Business and Management, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore - 560 074, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Several studies have examined the factors influencing audit fees across the world, especially on the possible conflict of interest of auditor and client that may be affecting the quality of audit. The paper is about the trend in audit fee in the Indian setting, with the backdrop of two regulatory changes: mandatory auditor rotation and the implementation of Ind AS, the converged version of IFRS. Examining the determinants of audit fees, the paper categorized the explanatory variables into three attributes; auditee (size, risk, and complexity), auditor (auditor size, tenure, joint audit, and auditor rotation), and regulatory (mandatory auditor rotation and IFRS). The sample consisted of all non-financial companies listed on the National Stock Exchange for a period of 10 years from 2009 – 2018 resulting in 12,419 firm years. The paper deployed panel data regression with fixed effects with audit fee as the dependent variable. The key findings suggested that audit fee was positively associated with the size of the auditor and the auditee and the ratio of accounts receivable. The paper also indicated that with the tenure of the auditor, the fee tended to increase, and auditor rotation had a significant impact on the auditor's fee. The findings of the study will help the policymakers on the regulation around auditor engagements.

Keywords

Auditor Rotation, Joint Audit, Complexity, Fixed Effects Model, Ind AS, NSE.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abu Risheh, K. E., & Al-Saeed, M. A. (2014). The impact of IFRS adoption on audit fees : Evidence from Jordan. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 13(3), 520– 536.

  • Ahmed, K., & Goyal, M. K. (2005). A comparative study of pricing of audit services in emerging economies. International Journal of Auditing, 9(2), 103– 116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00236.x

  • Al-Ajmi, J. (2009). Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality : Evidence from Bahrain. Advances in Accounting, 25(1), 64– 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2009.02.005

  • Al-Harshani, M. O. (2008). The pricing of audit services: Evidence from Kuwait. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(7), 685– 696. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810890643

  • Al-Mutairi, A., Naser, K., & Al-Enazi, N. (2017). An empirical investigation of factors affecting audit fees : Evidence from Kuwait. International Advances in Economic Research, 23, 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-017-9649-5

  • Amba, S. M., & Al-Hajeri, F. K. (2013). Determinants of audit fees in Bahrain : An empirical study. Journal of Finance & Accountancy, 13 (July), 1– 9.

  • Arens, A. A. & Loebbecke, J. H. (1994). Auditing : An integrated approach. Englewood Cliffs.

  • Billor, N., Hadi, A. S., & Velleman, P. F. (2000). BACON: Blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 34(3), 279– 298.

  • Biswas, S. (2019). Do audit fees adjust quickly ?– Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 1– 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919843382

  • Boon, K., Crowe, S., McKinnon, J., & Ross, P. (2005). Compulsory audit tendering and audit fees : Evidence from Australian local government. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00288.x

  • Cohen, S., & Leventis, S. (2013). An empirical investigation of audit pricing in the public sector : The case of Greek LGOs. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(1), 74– 98. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12003

  • Curry, B., & Peel, M. J. (1998). Neural networks and business forecasting : An application to cross-sectional audit fee data. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 8(2), 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047370

  • DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183– 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

  • El Guindy, M. N., & Trabelsi, N. S. (2020). IFRS adoption/reporting and auditor fees: The conditional effect of audit firm size and tenure. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(4), 639– 666. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0107

  • El-Gammal, W. (2012). Determinants of audit fees : Evidence from Lebanon. International Business Research, 5(11), 136– 145. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n11p136

  • Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality ? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345– 368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAR.2004.09.003

  • Gates, S. K., Jordan Lowe, D., & Reckers, P. M. J. (2006).Restoring public confidence in capital markets through auditor rotation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710715611

  • Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing : A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.67

  • Gonthier - Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2007). Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710718654

  • Grant Thornton. (2018). The future of audit in India– A series by Grand Thornton. Grand Thornton Prime Database.

  • Greene, WH. (2018). Econometric analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.

  • Guedhami, O., & Pittman, J. A. (2006). Ownership concentration in privatized firms : The role of disclosure standards, auditor choice, and auditing infrastructure. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5), 889– 929. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00219.x

  • Gul, F. A., Kim, J. - B., & Qiu, A. A. (2010). Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.11.005

  • Hải, P. T., Toan, L. D., & Quy, N. L. D. (2019). Effect of audit rotation, audit fee and auditor competence to motivation auditor and audit quality: Empirical evidence in Vietnam. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(2), 1–15.

  • Hay, D. (2010). The accumulated weight of evidence in audit fee research : Further steps in meta - analysis. Sixth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, 1– 40.

  • Higgins, S., Lont, D., & Scott, T. (2016). Longer term audit costs of IFRS and the differential impact of implied auditor cost structures. Accounting & Finance, 56(1), 165– 203.

  • Houqe, M. N., Ahmed, K., & Van Zijl, T. (2015). Effects of audit quality on earnings quality and cost of equity capital: Evidence from India. International Journal of Auditing, 21(2), 177–189.

  • Ivanova, M. N., & Prencipe, A. (2020). The effects of board interlocks with an allegedly fraudulent company on audit fees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 1– 31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X20971947

  • Jackson, A. B., Moldrich, M., & Roebuck, P. (2008). Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(5), 420– 437. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810875271

  • Joshi, P. L., & Al-Bastaki, H. (2000). Determinants of audit fees : Evidence from the companies listed in Bahrain. International Journal of Auditing, 4(2), 129– 138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00308

  • Joshi, P.L., Krishnan, A., Nik Salleh, N.M. (2017). The determinants of firms’ characteristics on the audit and non-audit premium : An analysis of firms listed in the Malaysia Stock Exchange. Indian Journal of Finance, 11(4), 7– 22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i4/112627

  • Kaawaase, T. K., Assad, M. J., Kitindi, E. G., & Nkundabanyanga, S. K. (2016).Audit quality differences amongst audit firms in a developing economy : The case of Uganda. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 6(3), 269– 290. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-08-2013-0041

  • Kamath, R., Huang, T. - C., & Moroney, R. A. (2018). Auditor rotation and perceived competence and independence : The effect of fees and industry specialization. Journal of International Accounting Research, 17(3), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-52227

  • Kim, J. - B., Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on audit fees : Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2061–2094. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50223

  • Li, C., Song, F. M., & Wong, S. M. (2008). A continuous relation between audit firm size and audit opinions : Evidence from China. International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099 1123.2008.00374.x

  • Lin, H. - L., & Yen, A. - R. (2016). The effects of IFRS experience on audit fees for listed companies in China. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(1), 43– 68. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-02-2014-0028

  • Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2018). Findings and recommendations on regulating audit firms and the networks. http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/2018_CommitteeExperts_Report_08112018.pdf

  • Mohamed, D. M., & Habib, M. H. (2013). Auditor independence, audit quality and the mandatory auditor rotation in Egypt. Education, Business and Society : Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 6(2), 116– 144. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBS-07-2012-0035

  • Narayanaswamy, R., & Raghunandan, K. (2019). The effect of mandatory audit firm rotation on audit quality, audit fees and audit market concentration : Evidence from India. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3360256

  • Pouraghajan, A. A. (2009). Factors influencing audit quality: With evidence. Indian Journal of Finance, 3(7), 16– 24. Retrieved from http://www.indianjournaloffinance.co.in/index.php/IJF/article/view/71600

  • Pratt, J., & Stice, J. D. (1994). The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees. The Accounting Review, 69(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/248435

  • Prime Database Group. (2019). Mutual fund & DII ownership at all time high ; FPI holding at 2-year high : NSEinfobase.com. http://www.primedatabase.com/doc_email/nseinfobase.com_Quarterly%20Shareholding%20Tracker_%20June%202019_Detailed%20Report.pdf

  • Rawat, V. (2017, September 7). 'Ind– AS is still a moving goal post’: IFRS expert. CFO.com. https://cfo.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ind-as-is-still-a-moving-goal-post/60374017

  • Sandra, W. M. H., & Patrick, P. H. N. (1996). The determinants of audit fees in Hong Kong: An empirical study. Asian Review of Accounting, 4(2), 32– 50. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060673

  • Simon, D. T., & Taylor, M. H. (2002). A survey of audit pricing in Ireland. International Journal of Auditing, 6(1), 3– 12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2002.tb00002.x

  • Stewart, J., & Munro, L. (2007). The impact of audit committee existence and audit committee meeting frequency on the external audit : Perceptions of Australian auditors. International Journal of Auditing, 11(1), 51– 69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00356.x

  • Vanstraelen, A. (2000). Impact of renewable long-term audit mandates on audit quality. European Accounting Review, 9(3), 419– 442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180020017140

  • Venkatesh, & Aghajan, A. P. (2008). The relationship between non-audit service and auditor independence with evidence. Indian Journal of Finance, 2(5), 26–32. Retrieved from http://www.indianjournaloffinance.co.in/index.php/IJF/article/view/71658


Abstract Views: 272

PDF Views: 0




  • Determinants of Audit Fee - Evidence from Indian Companies

Abstract Views: 272  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Latha Ramesh
Associate Professor, School of Business and Management, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore - 560 029, India
Rajashree Kamath
Assistant Professor, School of Business and Management, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore - 560 074, India

Abstract


Several studies have examined the factors influencing audit fees across the world, especially on the possible conflict of interest of auditor and client that may be affecting the quality of audit. The paper is about the trend in audit fee in the Indian setting, with the backdrop of two regulatory changes: mandatory auditor rotation and the implementation of Ind AS, the converged version of IFRS. Examining the determinants of audit fees, the paper categorized the explanatory variables into three attributes; auditee (size, risk, and complexity), auditor (auditor size, tenure, joint audit, and auditor rotation), and regulatory (mandatory auditor rotation and IFRS). The sample consisted of all non-financial companies listed on the National Stock Exchange for a period of 10 years from 2009 – 2018 resulting in 12,419 firm years. The paper deployed panel data regression with fixed effects with audit fee as the dependent variable. The key findings suggested that audit fee was positively associated with the size of the auditor and the auditee and the ratio of accounts receivable. The paper also indicated that with the tenure of the auditor, the fee tended to increase, and auditor rotation had a significant impact on the auditor's fee. The findings of the study will help the policymakers on the regulation around auditor engagements.

Keywords


Auditor Rotation, Joint Audit, Complexity, Fixed Effects Model, Ind AS, NSE.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf%2F2021%2Fv15i4%2F158671