Indian Journal of Finance

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Sustainability Reporting of Indian Companies and the Adherence to GRI Disclosure Framework


Affiliations
1 Justice KS Hegde Institute of Management (JKSHIM), Nitte - 574 110, Karnataka, India

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Given that all significant stakeholders expect companies to be transparent with financial and nonfinancial disclosures, companies are under increasing pressure and are also morally obliged to adhere to voluntary disclosure frameworks. In this regard, the GRI disclosure framework (non-financials) has recently attracted a lot of attention, and listed Indian companies are about to comply with this disclosure framework. Accordingly, this study attempted to gain insights into the extent to which recorded Indian companies adhere to the GRI disclosure framework. For this purpose, we captured the sustainability reports of Indian listed companies from the GRI Sustainability Disclosure Database (SDD) for a span ranging from 20 years from 2000 onwards. The results from this study indicated that of the million listed companies in India, only a few (425 companies) submitted their sustainability reports with GRI in compliance with the guidelines. However, another interesting finding is that majority of these compliant companies are long-listed and from the ESSI industry classification. As GRI disclosure compliance gives away companies’ ethical solid governance practices, it is pretty surprising that exceptionally few Indian companies choose to do so consistently. In line with the findings of this study, we discussed practical and research implications.

Keywords

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Social Disclosure, Sustainability Reporting, GRI Disclosure Framework, Compliance.

JEL Classifications Codes : M14, M16, M41

Paper Submission Date : August 20, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : May 26, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 20, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : September 15, 2022

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abd Rahman, N. H., Zain, M. M., & Al‐Haj, N. H. (2011). CSR disclosures and its determinants: Evidence from Malaysian government link companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111141486

  • Adams, C. A., Hill, W.-Y., & Roberts, C. B. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behavior? The British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1997.0060

  • Ahamed, N. (2014). Multiple directorship & interlock: An empirical study of its impact on firms' financial performance. Indian Journal of Finance, 8(10), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i10/71848

  • Baskin, J. (2006). Value, values and sustainability: Corporate responsibility in emerging market companies. Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1094573

  • Bedenik, N. O., & Barišić, P. (2019). Nonfinancial reporting: Theoretical and empirical evidence. In, M. Sarfraz, M. I. Abdullah, A. Rauf, & S. G. M. Shah (eds.), Sustainable management practice. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87159

  • Behal, V., & Gupta, M. (2022). Reporting of corporate social responsibility practices: An evidence from Indian BSE-listed companies. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(3), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i3/165633

  • Bhatia, A., & Tuli, S. (2014). An empirical analysis of sustainability disclosure practices: Evidence from India and China. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 3(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975214542057

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z

  • Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8

  • Charumathi, B., & Ramesh, L. (2017). Do social and environmental disclosures increase firm value? Evidence from Indian companies. Indian Journal of Finance, 11(4), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i4/112628

  • Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000006264

  • Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963818042000339617

  • Cowen, S. S., Ferreri, L. B., & Parker, L. D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8

  • Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures — A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852

  • Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

  • Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2008). GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00670.x

  • Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9721-4

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

  • Jose, A. M., Jose, M. T., & Suresh, G. (2022). Impact of corporate governance on financial performance of Nifty 50 companies: An empirical analysis. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 8(3), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2021/v8i3/167955

  • Kansal, M., Joshi, M., & Batra, G.S. (2014). Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Advances in Accounting, 30(1), 217–229.

  • Kolk, A. (2010). Trajectories of sustainability reporting by MNCs. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.001

  • Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003

  • Mohtsham Saeed, M., & Arshad, F. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of competitive advantage: The mediating role of social capital and reputational capital. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 19(4), 219 – 232.

  • Paine, L. S., & Srinivasan, S. (2019). A guide to the big ideas and debates in corporate governance. Harvard Business Review, 2 – 19.

  • Passah, H., Ninan, G., & Anuradha, P. (2020). Asymmetric effects of sustainability indices in emerging Asian countries. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 7(4), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2020/v7i4/157912

  • Preuss, L., & Barkemeyer, R. (2011). CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: Is Russia a different shape of BRIC? Corporate Governance, 11(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701111159226

  • Quick, R. (2008). Voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Germany: A study on reporting quality. Portuguese Journal of Accounting and Management, 5(1), 7–35.

  • Roberts, D.H., & Koeplin, J.P. (2007). Sustainability reporting practices in Portugal: Greenwashing or triple bottom line. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 6(9), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v6i9.3403

  • SDD - GRI Database. (2018). Globalreporting.org. http://database.globalreporting.org/

  • Tuli, S. (2013). A comparative study of sustainability disclosure practices of India and USA. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 9(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X13483509

  • Wilburn, K., & Wilburn, R. (2013). Using Global Reporting Initiative indicators for CSR programs. Journal of Global Responsibility, 4(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561311324078


Abstract Views: 220

PDF Views: 0




  • Sustainability Reporting of Indian Companies and the Adherence to GRI Disclosure Framework

Abstract Views: 220  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rakhesh Shetty
Justice KS Hegde Institute of Management (JKSHIM), Nitte - 574 110, Karnataka, India
K. Ashalatha
Justice KS Hegde Institute of Management (JKSHIM), Nitte - 574 110, Karnataka, India

Abstract


Given that all significant stakeholders expect companies to be transparent with financial and nonfinancial disclosures, companies are under increasing pressure and are also morally obliged to adhere to voluntary disclosure frameworks. In this regard, the GRI disclosure framework (non-financials) has recently attracted a lot of attention, and listed Indian companies are about to comply with this disclosure framework. Accordingly, this study attempted to gain insights into the extent to which recorded Indian companies adhere to the GRI disclosure framework. For this purpose, we captured the sustainability reports of Indian listed companies from the GRI Sustainability Disclosure Database (SDD) for a span ranging from 20 years from 2000 onwards. The results from this study indicated that of the million listed companies in India, only a few (425 companies) submitted their sustainability reports with GRI in compliance with the guidelines. However, another interesting finding is that majority of these compliant companies are long-listed and from the ESSI industry classification. As GRI disclosure compliance gives away companies’ ethical solid governance practices, it is pretty surprising that exceptionally few Indian companies choose to do so consistently. In line with the findings of this study, we discussed practical and research implications.

Keywords


Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Social Disclosure, Sustainability Reporting, GRI Disclosure Framework, Compliance.

JEL Classifications Codes : M14, M16, M41

Paper Submission Date : August 20, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : May 26, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 20, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : September 15, 2022


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf%2F2022%2Fv16i9%2F172160