International Journal of Financial Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Multi-Index Conditional Investment Performance Measure:An Empirical Analysis


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Commerce, Rabindra Mahavidyalaya, Champadanga, Hooghly, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study seeks to examine the mutual fund performance of the open-ended selected equity schemes of UTI based on multi-index measures as well as conditional multi-index measure. It is observed from the analysis that multi-index measure is able to capture the beta and alpha effects on market adjusted basis and the estimated coefficients is a better representative as compared to the single index measure. When time lagged (lagged at 1 month, 2 months, quarterly and yearly) multi-index measures are applied then the estimated coefficients (alpha&beta) which are market adjusted and time adjusted look more representative than the multi-index measure (without lagged effect). Finally, when we extended the time lagged multi-index measure on a conditional way (conditional on public information variables) then we observe that conditional multi-index lagged measure provides much more representative results in all respects as compared to the all measures after conditioning public information effects.

Keywords

Single Index Measure, Multi-Index Measure, Conditional Multi-Index Measure, Stock Selection, Asset Class Exposures.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Arditi, F. D. (1971). Another look at mutual fund performance. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 6(3), 909-912.

  • Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business, 45(3), 444-454.

  • Brown, S. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (1995). Performance persistence. Journal of Finance, 50, 679-698.

  • Bollen, N., & Busse, J. A. (2001). On the timing ability of mutual fund manager. Journal of Finance, 56, 1075 -1094.

  • Coggin, T. D., Fabozzi, F. J., & Rahman, S. (1993). The investment performance of US equity pension fund managers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Finance, 1039-1055.

  • Chang, E. C., & Lewellen, W. G. (1984). Market-timing and mutual fund investment performance. Journal of Business, 57, 57-72.

  • Christopherson, J., Ferson, Wayne, & Glassman, Debra. (1998). Conditioning manager alphas on economic information: Another look at the persistence of performance. Review of Financial Studies, 11(1), 111-142.

  • Christopherson, J., Ferson, W., & Turner, A. (1999). Performance evaluation using conditional alphas and betas. Journal of Portfolio Management, 26(1), 59-72.

  • Dybvig, P., & Ross, S. (1985). Differential information and performance measurement using a security market line. Journal of Finance, 40(2), 383-399.

  • Elton, E., Gruber, M. I., Das, S., & Hlavka, M. (1993). Efficiency with costly information: a reinterpretation of evidence from managed portfolio. The review of Financial Studies, 6(1), 1-22.

  • Fama, E. F. (1972). Components of investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 27(3), 551-567.

  • Ferson, W., & Schadt, R. (1996). Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions. Journal of Finance, 51(6), 425-461.

  • Fama, E., & French, K. (1989). Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 23-49.

  • Fransworth, H. (1997). Conditional performance Evaluation. In paxson, D., Wood, D. (eds), Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Finance, Blackwell Business, 23-24.

  • Ferson, W., & Warther, V. (1996), Evaluating fund performance in a dynamic market. Financial Analysts Journal, 52(6), 20-28.

  • Ferson, W., & Qian, M. (2004). Conditional performance evaluation, revisited. Working Paper, Boston College-EUA.

  • Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1989). Portfolio performance evaluation: Old issues and new insights. Review of Financial Studies, 2(3), 393-422.

  • Gordon, M. J., & Gangoli, R. (1962). Choice among and scale of play on lottery type alternative. College of Business Administration, University of Rochester, 1-25.

  • Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (1996). Market-timing ability and volatility implied in investment newsletter’ asset allocation recommendation. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(3), 397-421.

  • Ilmanen, A. (1995). Time-varying expected returns in international bond markets. Journal of Finance, 50(2), 481-506.

  • Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23, 389-416.

  • Jensen, M. (1972). Optimal utilization of market forecasts and the evaluation of investment performance. In Szego, G; Shell, K. (eds), Mathematical methods in Investment and Finance, North-Holland, 310-335.

  • Kon, S., & Jen, F. (1978). The investment performance of mutual funds: An empirical investigation of timing, selectivity and market efficiency. Journal of Business, 52, 263-289.

  • Koulis., Beneki., Adam, & Botsaris. (2011). An assessment of the performance of Greek mutual equity funds selectivity and market-timing. Applied Mathematical Science, 5(4), 159-171.

  • Linter, J. (1965). Security prices, risk and maximal gains from diversification. The Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587-615.

  • Lee, C. F., & Rahman, S. (1990). Market-timing, selectivity and mutual fund performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business, 63, 261-278.

  • Leite, A. P., & Cortez, C. M. (2005). Conditional performance evaluation: Evidence for the Portuguese mutual fund market. www.ssrn.com.pdf, 1-24.

  • Ljung, G.M. & Box G.E.P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series analysis models. Biometrika, Vol. 65(2), 297-303.

  • Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, 34, 141-183.

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 12, 77-91.

  • Moreno, D., Nawrocki, N.D, & Olmeda,I. (2003). On persistence of performance measures. Universidad Carlos III, C/Madrid 126, 28903 Getafe (Madrid), Spain, 1-20.

  • Otten, R., & Bams, D. (2004). How to measure mutual fund performance: Economic versus Statistical relevance. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 44(2), 203-222.

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Timmermann, A. (1995). Predictability of stock returns: Robustness and economic significance. Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1201-1228.

  • Rosenberg, B., & Mckibben, W. (1973). The prediction of systematic and specific risk in common stocks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8(2), 317-333.

  • Rosenberg, B., & Marathe, V. (1975). Common factors in security returns: Microeconomic determinants and macroeconomic correlates. Research Programme in Finance, Working Paper, 1-57.

  • Romacho, J., & Cortez, M. C. (2006). Timing and selectivity in Portuguese mutual fund performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 20(3), 275-374.

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 39, 119-138.

  • Santos, A., Tusi, J., Costa, N. D., & Silva, S. D. (2005). Evaluating Brazilian mutual funds with stochastic frontiers. www.economicsbulletin.com /volume13/EB-05M20002A.pdf, 1-37.

  • Silva, F., Cortez, M., & Armada, M. (2003). Conditioning information and European bonds fund performance. European Financial Management, 9(2),201-230.

  • Shanmughan, R., & Zabiulla. (2011). Stock selection strategies of equity mutual fund managers in India. Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 11, 19-27

  • Tobin. J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behaviour towards risk. The Review of Economic studies, 25, 65-86.

  • Thanou, E. L. (2008). Mutual fund performance evaluation during up and down market condition: The case of Greek equity mutual funds. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 13, 84-93.


Abstract Views: 235

PDF Views: 1




  • Multi-Index Conditional Investment Performance Measure:An Empirical Analysis

Abstract Views: 235  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Subrata Roy
Dept. of Commerce, Rabindra Mahavidyalaya, Champadanga, Hooghly, West Bengal, India

Abstract


The present study seeks to examine the mutual fund performance of the open-ended selected equity schemes of UTI based on multi-index measures as well as conditional multi-index measure. It is observed from the analysis that multi-index measure is able to capture the beta and alpha effects on market adjusted basis and the estimated coefficients is a better representative as compared to the single index measure. When time lagged (lagged at 1 month, 2 months, quarterly and yearly) multi-index measures are applied then the estimated coefficients (alpha&beta) which are market adjusted and time adjusted look more representative than the multi-index measure (without lagged effect). Finally, when we extended the time lagged multi-index measure on a conditional way (conditional on public information variables) then we observe that conditional multi-index lagged measure provides much more representative results in all respects as compared to the all measures after conditioning public information effects.

Keywords


Single Index Measure, Multi-Index Measure, Conditional Multi-Index Measure, Stock Selection, Asset Class Exposures.

References