International Journal of Financial Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Value: Empirical Evidence from Non-Financial Firms in Pakistan


Affiliations
1 Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This research examines the effect of enterprise risk management on firm value in Pakistan. Further, this study empirically examines company characteristics that establish the execution of an enterprise risk management system. Using a sample of final dataset of 83 non-financial firms located in Pakistan. The sample included non-financial firms from the year 1999 to 2015 and so up to seventeen observation years per company. As in context of Pakistan, most of the organizations are already implement an ERM programs and establish specialized ERM departments because the ERM is now a global term and has become increasingly relevant because of the growing difficulty of risk and an additional development of regulatory frame works. For the empirical evidences, data collected from non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Results of logistic regression shows that Capital Opacity, Profitability, Financial Leverage, Firm Size and Slack have positive impact on the implementation of an ERM system but Industrial diversification, Industry and Return on Equity are negatively related to an ERM engagement. The results of ordinary least square regression finds positive relationship between use of an ERM and firm value.

Keywords

Enterprise Risk Management, Firm Characteristics and Firm’s Value (Shareholder Value).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics, identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. Wiley

  • Beasley, M. S., Pagach, D. P., & Warr, R. S. (2008). Information conveyed in hiring announcements of senior executives overseeing enterprise-wide risk management processes. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance, 23, 311–332.

  • Beasley, M., Branson, B., & Hancock, B. (2010). COSO’s report on ERM-Current state of enterprise risk over-sight and market perceptions of COSO's ERM frame-work. Raleigh: ERM Initiative at North Carolina State University.

  • Beaslwy, M. S., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. R. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(3), 311–332.

  • Butt, S. A. (2014). Strategic finance: Finance book (2nd ed.).

  • Dickinson, G. (2001). Enterprise risk management its origins and conceptual foundation. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 26(3), 360–366.

  • Farrell, M., & Gallagher, R. (2015). The valuation implications of enterprise risk management maturity. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(3), 625–657.

  • Fraser, J. R. S., & Simkins, B. J. (2007). Ten common misconceptions about enterprise risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19(4), 75–81.

  • Gatzert, N., & Martin, M. (2013). Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: Empirical evidence from the literature. Working Paper, Department for Insurance Economics and Risk Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) of Erlangen.

  • Gatzert, N., & Martin, M. (2015). Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: Empirical evidence from the literature. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 18(1), 29–53.

  • Genrikh, L. (2015). The impact of enterprise risk management on firm performance of small and medium Enterprise. European Scientific Journal, 11(13), 1857–7881.

  • Golshan, N., & Rasid, S. (2012). Determinants of enterprise risk management adoption: An empirical analysis of Malaysian public listed firms. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 6, 119–126.

  • Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28, 301–327.

  • Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2003). The determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the Appointment of chief risk officers. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 6(1), 37–52.

  • Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2008). The value of the enterprise risk management: Evidence from the U.S. Insurance Industry.

  • Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795–822.

  • Li, Q.,Wu, Y., Ojiako, U., Marshall, A., & Chipulu, M. (2014). Enterprise risk management and firm value within China’s Insurance Industry. ActaCommercii, 14(1), 1–10.

  • Lin, Y., Wen, M. M., & Yu, J. (2012). Enterprise risk management: Strategic antecendents, risk integration and performance. North American Actuarial Journal, 16(1), 1–28.

  • McShane, M. K., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2011). Does enterprise risk management increase firm value? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26(4), 641–658.

  • Moeller, R. R. (2011). COSO Enterprise risk management: Establishing effective governance, risk, and compliance process (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Nocco, B. W., & Stulz, R. M. (2006). Enterprise risk management: Theory and practice. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(4), 8–20.

  • Pagach, D., &Warr, R. (2010). The effects of enterprise risk management on firm performance. Working Paper Raleigh: North Carolina State University.

  • Pagach, D., & Warr, R. (2011). The characteristics of firms that hire chief risk officers. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(1), 185–211.

  • Philipp, L., & Nadine, G. (2017). Determinants and value of enterprise Risk management: empirical evidence from Germany. The European Journal of Finance, 1351(874), 1466–4364.

  • Razali, A. R., & Tahir, I. M. (2011). Review of the literature on enterprise risk management. Business Management Dynamics, 1(5), 8–16.

  • Razali, A. R., Yazid, A. S., & Tahir, I. M. (2011). The determinants of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Practices in Malaysian public listed companies. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 1(5), 202–207.

  • Subhani, M. I., & Osman, A. (2011). The essence of enterprise risk management in today’s business enterprises in developed and developing nations. European Journal of Social Sciences (EJSS).


Abstract Views: 257

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Value: Empirical Evidence from Non-Financial Firms in Pakistan

Abstract Views: 257  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nouman Nasir
Capital University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract


This research examines the effect of enterprise risk management on firm value in Pakistan. Further, this study empirically examines company characteristics that establish the execution of an enterprise risk management system. Using a sample of final dataset of 83 non-financial firms located in Pakistan. The sample included non-financial firms from the year 1999 to 2015 and so up to seventeen observation years per company. As in context of Pakistan, most of the organizations are already implement an ERM programs and establish specialized ERM departments because the ERM is now a global term and has become increasingly relevant because of the growing difficulty of risk and an additional development of regulatory frame works. For the empirical evidences, data collected from non-financial firms listed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Results of logistic regression shows that Capital Opacity, Profitability, Financial Leverage, Firm Size and Slack have positive impact on the implementation of an ERM system but Industrial diversification, Industry and Return on Equity are negatively related to an ERM engagement. The results of ordinary least square regression finds positive relationship between use of an ERM and firm value.

Keywords


Enterprise Risk Management, Firm Characteristics and Firm’s Value (Shareholder Value).

References