International Journal of Financial Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Relevance of Intellectual Capital Valuation: Indian Evidence


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce, Kalna College, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Commerce, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Intellectual capital (IC) shows a significantly growing acceptance as a worthy topic of academic investigation and practical implication. The main objective of this study is to determine the monetary value of intellectual capital and to examine whether the joint explanatory power of intellectual capital (IC), book value (BV) and earnings (residual income based on GAAP) for stock price is superior to that of earnings and book value of Indian companies. Additionally, the study aims to investigate the impact of intellectual capital on corporate value creation. This study is conducted on 110 leading knowledge companies operating in India during the period 2007 to 2011. An appropriate method is to be applied for measuring the intellectual capital performance of the company. In our study we extend the Ohlson's (1995) discounted residual income method to rationally measure firm's value by considering intellectual capital (IC). Regression models are examined in order to test the hypotheses included in the proposed conceptual framework. The empirical findings suggest that the efficient management of company's intellectual capital, in addition to earnings and tangible assets, can explain corporate value. Results proved that, in the Indian business context, the development of Intellectual resources seems to be one of the most significant factors of success. This study extends the understanding of the role of intellectual capital in creating corporate value and building sustainable competitive advantages for companies in emerging economies like India and may bring implications for valuation and reporting of intellectual capital.

Keywords

Intellectual Capital, Valuation, Efficiency, Market Value, Indian Companies
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abernethy, M., Bianchi, P., Del Bello, A., Labory, S., Lev, B., Wyatt, A. Zambon, S. (2003). Study on the measurement of intangible assets and associated reporting Practices. Commission of the European Communities Enterprise Directorate General. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/internal_market/.../2003-study-intangassets-full_en.pdf

  • Abeysekera, I. & Guthrie, J. (2005). An empirical investigation of annual reporting trends of intellectual capital in Sri Lanka. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3), 151-163.

  • Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H. & Landsman, W. R. (1998). Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a functional of financial health. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 25(1), 1-34.

  • Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital- Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. London: International Thomson Business Press.

  • Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J. & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 159-176.

  • Cheng, M., Lin, J., Hsiao, T. & Thomas, W. L. (2010). Invested resource, competitive intellectual capital, and corporate performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(4), 433-450.

  • Chu, S. K. W., Chan, K. H. C. & Wendy, W. Y. W. (2011). Charting intellectual capital performance of the gateway to China. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 249-276.

  • Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The Proven Way to Establish your Company’s Real Value by Measuring its Hidden Brainpower. London: Judy Piatkus.

  • Firer, S. & Stainbank, L. (2003). Testing the relationship between intellectual capital and a company’s performance: Evidence from South Africa. Meditari Accountancy Research, 11(1), 25-44.

  • Gan, K. & Saleh, Z. (2008). Intellectual capital and corporate performance of technology-intensive companies: Malaysia evidence. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 1(1), 113-130.

  • Ghosh, D. & Wu, A. (2007). Intellectual capital and capital market: Additional Evidence. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(2), 216-238.

  • Goldfinger, C. (1997). Understanding and Measuring the Intangible Economy: Current Status and Suggestions for Future Research. Helsinki: CIRET Seminar.

  • Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Ferrier, F. & Wells, R. (1999). There is No Accounting for Intellectual Capital in Australia: A Review of Annual Reporting Practices and Internal Measurement of Intangibles. Paper presented at the OECD Symposium on Measuring and Reporting of Intellectual Capital, Amsterdam.

  • Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. & Kochhar, P. (2001). Direct and moderating Effects of human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-Based Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13-28.

  • Ismail. & Karem. (2011). Intellectual capital and the financial performance of banks in Bahrain. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 1(1), 63-77.

  • Iswari. & Anshori. (2007). The Influence of Intellectual Capital to Financial Performance at Insurance Companies in Jakarta Stock Exchanges. Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Australia.

  • Komnenic, B. & Pokrajcic, D. (2012). Intellectual capital and corporate performance of MNCs in SERBIA. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(1), 106-119.

  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press

  • Lev, B. & Radhakrishnam, S. (2003). The measurement of firm-specific organization capital, NEBR Working Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w9581.

  • Lev, B., Sarat, B. & Sougiannis, T. (2005). R&Drelated reporting biases and their consequences. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 977-1026.

  • Mondal, A. & Ghosh, S. K. (2012). Intellectual capital and financial performance of Indian Banks. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 515-530.

  • Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-87.

  • Pulic, A. (2000). VAICTM- An accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(5/6/7/8), 702-714.

  • Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2003). Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: a study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(2), 215-226.

  • Roos, J., Edvinsson, L. & Dragonetti, N. (1998). Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. New York: University Press.

  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth:Managing & Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

  • Stewart. T. A. (1997), Intellectual Capital-The NewWealth of Organizations. New York: Doubleday. Dell Publishing Group.

  • Wiig, K. M. (1997). Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 399-405.

  • Wong, M. & Gardner, C. T. (2005). Intellectual capital disclosure: New Zealand evidence. Paper presented at 2005 AFAANZ Conference, Melbourne. Retrieved from www.afaanz.org/web2005.pdf


Abstract Views: 393

PDF Views: 14




  • The Relevance of Intellectual Capital Valuation: Indian Evidence

Abstract Views: 393  |  PDF Views: 14

Authors

Amitava Mondal
Department of Commerce, Kalna College, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India
Santanu Kumar Ghosh
Department of Commerce, The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Intellectual capital (IC) shows a significantly growing acceptance as a worthy topic of academic investigation and practical implication. The main objective of this study is to determine the monetary value of intellectual capital and to examine whether the joint explanatory power of intellectual capital (IC), book value (BV) and earnings (residual income based on GAAP) for stock price is superior to that of earnings and book value of Indian companies. Additionally, the study aims to investigate the impact of intellectual capital on corporate value creation. This study is conducted on 110 leading knowledge companies operating in India during the period 2007 to 2011. An appropriate method is to be applied for measuring the intellectual capital performance of the company. In our study we extend the Ohlson's (1995) discounted residual income method to rationally measure firm's value by considering intellectual capital (IC). Regression models are examined in order to test the hypotheses included in the proposed conceptual framework. The empirical findings suggest that the efficient management of company's intellectual capital, in addition to earnings and tangible assets, can explain corporate value. Results proved that, in the Indian business context, the development of Intellectual resources seems to be one of the most significant factors of success. This study extends the understanding of the role of intellectual capital in creating corporate value and building sustainable competitive advantages for companies in emerging economies like India and may bring implications for valuation and reporting of intellectual capital.

Keywords


Intellectual Capital, Valuation, Efficiency, Market Value, Indian Companies

References