International Journal of Financial Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Economic Value added Vis-a-vis Thinking of Indian Corporate Managers: A Survey Analysis


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The main rationale of this study is to explore the manager's thoughts towards the hottest idea of fi nancial performance measurement i.e. economic value added or EVA. Debate is going on in corporate world of fi nance regarding the intrinsic worth and rarity of EVA. EVA was promoted profoundly by Stern Stewart, a New York based consulting fi rm, during 1990's. The proponent of EVA presented it as the wonder remedy of the millennium in overcoming all corporate ills at one stroke and ultimately helps in raising the wealth of the shareholders, which is identical with the maximization of the fi rm value. But till date, EVA is the generally misapprehended phrase among the academicians and practitioners of corporate fi nance. For assessing the ingenious thinking of corporate managers of select industries, this study has been carried on the basis of primary data. For this purpose data has been collected from managers working in information technology (IT) and pharmaceutical industries through a well structured questionnaire. Manager's opinion towards important attributes like perception towards EVA, views regarding superiority, existing status of different fi nancial measurement tools, expected outcomes of EVA, causes of reluctance for applying EVA , heterogeneous perception towards EVA among managers working in select industries and Respondents' opinion towards EVA: without boundaries are essentially measured by using fi ve point interval scales. Out of the 81 valid responses only 3.4% respondent organizations are using Economic Value Added (EVA) as a fi nancial performance measurement tool. Most of the respondents agreed that it is the better fi nancial tool than traditional tools. But, yet Indian corporate is not very sure about its cost, effect and implementation in the organization. They still feel that they should wait and watch. Moreover, there is signifi cant difference between the thinking of the managers of Information Technology and Pharmaceutical industries regarding enthusiastic application of economic value added.

Keywords

Value Based Management, Economic Value Added, Market Value Added, Nopat And Financial Performance Measurement Tools
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bravo, O., Gaitan, I. and Torres, J. (2009). EVA Theory. Journal of Management for value, 19-42.

  • Bhattacharyya, A.K. and Phani, B.V. (2004). Economic Value Added- A General Perspective. Working Paper Series, Available at SSRN.

  • Chen, S., and Dodd, J. L. (1997). Economic Value Added (EVA TM): An empirical examination of a new corporate performance measure. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(3), 318 - 333.

  • Ehrbar, AL (1999) Using EVA to measure performance and assess strategy. Journal of Strategy and Leadership, 27(3), P. 20.

  • Freeman, L.N. (2004). Economic value added refl ects long-term benefi ts of investments, projects. Ophthalmology Times, July, 29 (14), P. 60.

  • Huang, D.T., Chen, S.S. and Liu, Z.C. (2007). Board Composition, Capital Expenditure and Corporate value in high-technology Firms. Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacifi c Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 784-793.

  • Iseri, M. and Kayakutla, G. (2006). Economic Value Added by Intellectual Retailers in a Developing Country. Review of Social, Economic and Business Studies, Vol. ¾, 83-98.

  • Ismail, A., (2006). Is economic value added more associated with stock return than accounting earning? The UK evidence. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4), 343-353.

  • Kudla, R.J. and Arendt, D.A. (2000). Making EVA Work. Journal of corporate Finance, 20 (4), 98-103.

  • Kukreja, B.K. and Giridhar, B.S. (2005). Value-based performance metrics in the pharmaceutical industry. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, January- March, 60-73.

  • Makelainen, Esa (1998). Economic Value Added as a Management tool Unpublished Master’s thesis, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki, Finland and also available at www.evanomics.com.

  • Morard, B. and Olivia, F.O. (2009), “Developing a practical model for calculating the economic value added,” The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies at http://www.investopedia.com.

  • Petravicius, Tomas and Tamosiuniene, Rima (2008). Corporate performance and the measure of value added. Journal of Transport 23 (3), 194-201 also available at www.transport.vgtu.it.

  • Phillips, D., (2007). The Value of Economic Reality: Applying Economic Value Added. Liberty University Spring, 1-30.

  • Satish, R. and Rau, S.S. (2009). Awareness and Adaptability of Economic Value Addition. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, October-December, 48-57.

  • Singh and Garg, M.C. (2004). Economic Value Added in Indian Corporate. Deep and Deep Publications, Ch.8, 261-273.

  • Stewart, G.B.. (1994). EVA: Fact and Fantasy. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2) 71- 84.


Abstract Views: 327

PDF Views: 0




  • Economic Value added Vis-a-vis Thinking of Indian Corporate Managers: A Survey Analysis

Abstract Views: 327  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abstract


The main rationale of this study is to explore the manager's thoughts towards the hottest idea of fi nancial performance measurement i.e. economic value added or EVA. Debate is going on in corporate world of fi nance regarding the intrinsic worth and rarity of EVA. EVA was promoted profoundly by Stern Stewart, a New York based consulting fi rm, during 1990's. The proponent of EVA presented it as the wonder remedy of the millennium in overcoming all corporate ills at one stroke and ultimately helps in raising the wealth of the shareholders, which is identical with the maximization of the fi rm value. But till date, EVA is the generally misapprehended phrase among the academicians and practitioners of corporate fi nance. For assessing the ingenious thinking of corporate managers of select industries, this study has been carried on the basis of primary data. For this purpose data has been collected from managers working in information technology (IT) and pharmaceutical industries through a well structured questionnaire. Manager's opinion towards important attributes like perception towards EVA, views regarding superiority, existing status of different fi nancial measurement tools, expected outcomes of EVA, causes of reluctance for applying EVA , heterogeneous perception towards EVA among managers working in select industries and Respondents' opinion towards EVA: without boundaries are essentially measured by using fi ve point interval scales. Out of the 81 valid responses only 3.4% respondent organizations are using Economic Value Added (EVA) as a fi nancial performance measurement tool. Most of the respondents agreed that it is the better fi nancial tool than traditional tools. But, yet Indian corporate is not very sure about its cost, effect and implementation in the organization. They still feel that they should wait and watch. Moreover, there is signifi cant difference between the thinking of the managers of Information Technology and Pharmaceutical industries regarding enthusiastic application of economic value added.

Keywords


Value Based Management, Economic Value Added, Market Value Added, Nopat And Financial Performance Measurement Tools

References