Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Portfolio Construction and The Reduction of Diversifiable Risk


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor , Commerce, Rabindra Mahavidyalaya, Hooghly, West Bengal, India
2 Professor, Department of Commerce, University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study attempts to construct the optimum mutual fund portfolios by the open-ended mutual fund schemes (income&growth). The study also examines whether the newly constructed portfolios are able to reduce diversifiable risk and which type of mutual fund schemes is better. For the achievement of these objectives, monthly closing net asset values of the open-ended income and growth schemes have been considered and the data have been obtained from the website of Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI). Similarly, the yields of 7 years Gov. dated securities have been taken into account as the proxy of risk free rate and finally, the monthly index values of Bombay Sensitive index have been considered as market surrogate for this study. The study period has been considered from 2001 to 2010. It has been observed from the study that the diversifiable risk (unsystematic risk) of both types of schemes (Income&Growth) is in decline when new portfolios have been made. It has also been found that the unsystematic risk of the newly constructed portfolios of income as well as growth schemes is higher.

Keywords

Mutual Fund, Portfolio Construction, Diversifiable Risk, Market Index, Risk-Free Rate
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bhalla. (2005). Security Analysis and Portfolio Management. New Delhi: Sultan Chand & Company Ltd.
  • Chander, R. (2002). An Evaluation of Portfolio Performance Components across Fund Characteristics. Finance India, 26(4), pp. 1377-1391.
  • Chander. (2005). Empirical Investigation on the Investment Managers Stock Selection Abilities: The Indian Experience. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 11, pp. 5-20.
  • Choudhary, K. (2007). The Components of Investment Performance of Fund Managers: Evidences from Indian Capital Market. Abhigyan, pp. 16-27
  • Evans. & Archer. (1968). Diversification and the Reduction of Dispersion: An Empirical Analysis. The Journal of Finance, December, 23(5), pp. 761-767.
  • Fama. (1972). Components of Investment Performance. The Journal of Finance, 27(3), pp. 551-567.
  • Gupta. & Sehgal. Investment Performance of Mutual Funds: The Indian Experience. Paper Presented at 2nd UTI-ICM Capital Markets Conference. December 23-24 at Vasi, Navi Mumbai.
  • Jayadev, M. (1996). Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Monthly Returns. Finance India, March, 10(1), pp. 73-84.
  • Jensen. (1968). The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23, pp. 389-416.
  • Narasimhan. & Vijayalakshmi. (2010). Performance Analysis of Mutual Funds in India. Finance India, March, 15(1), pp. 155-174.
  • Panwar. & Madhumathi. Characteristics and Performance Evaluation of Selected Mutual Funds in India. website of ssrn.com.
  • Rao. & Ravindran. Performance Evaluation of Indian Mutual Funds. Website of ssrn.com.
  • Reilly, F. K. (1982). Investment. New York: The Dryden Press.
  • Sadhak, H. Mutual Funds in India: Marketing Strategies and Investment Practices. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Sharpe, W.F. (1966). Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Business, 39, pp. 119-138.
  • Shah, S. M. A. & Tahirhijazi, S. (2005). Performance Evaluation of Mutual Funds in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, Winter, 44(2), pp. 863-876.
  • Sipra, N. (2006). Mutual Fund Performance in Pakistan, 1995-2004 Website of SSRN. Paper No. 06-45.
  • Sondhi. & Jain. (2006). Can Growth Stocks be Identified for Investment? A Study of Equity Selectivity Abilities of Fund Managers in India. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 13, pp. 17-30.
  • Treynor, J. L. (1965). How to Rate Management of Investment Funds. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), pp. 63-75.
  • Treynor. & Mazuy. (1966). Can Mutual Funds Outguess the Market?” Harvard Business Review, pp. 131- 136.

Abstract Views: 278

PDF Views: 0




  • Portfolio Construction and The Reduction of Diversifiable Risk

Abstract Views: 278  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Subrata Roy
Assistant Professor , Commerce, Rabindra Mahavidyalaya, Hooghly, West Bengal, India
Shantanu Kumar Ghosh
Professor, Department of Commerce, University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India

Abstract


The study attempts to construct the optimum mutual fund portfolios by the open-ended mutual fund schemes (income&growth). The study also examines whether the newly constructed portfolios are able to reduce diversifiable risk and which type of mutual fund schemes is better. For the achievement of these objectives, monthly closing net asset values of the open-ended income and growth schemes have been considered and the data have been obtained from the website of Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI). Similarly, the yields of 7 years Gov. dated securities have been taken into account as the proxy of risk free rate and finally, the monthly index values of Bombay Sensitive index have been considered as market surrogate for this study. The study period has been considered from 2001 to 2010. It has been observed from the study that the diversifiable risk (unsystematic risk) of both types of schemes (Income&Growth) is in decline when new portfolios have been made. It has also been found that the unsystematic risk of the newly constructed portfolios of income as well as growth schemes is higher.

Keywords


Mutual Fund, Portfolio Construction, Diversifiable Risk, Market Index, Risk-Free Rate

References