International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Gap Analysis: Comparison of Job-related Attributes between Importance and Satisfaction.


Affiliations
1 Department of Recreation, Hospitality and Parks Management, College of Communication and Education, California State University, Chico, Yolo Hall 192, Box 0560, Chico, CA 95929-0560.
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Employees have their own perceptions or attitudes about many aspects of work itself, and their own satisfaction with job or non-work-related attributes. Job satisfaction has been widely studied by many researchers and practitioners. This study surveys selected work-related attributes to help hoteliers improve work environments. This study initially identifies the level of importance on work-related attributes and the level of satisfaction with those attributes among hotel workers. Whether differences exist between the levels of importance of work-related attributes and satisfaction with those attributes is also explored. The purpose of this study is to identify how hotel workers perceive their work environments and identify areas that need more attention from hotel managers. Based on the purpose of this study, work-related attributes are measured according to the level of importance and the level of satisfaction. The study indicates that hotel workers consider their work environments, in terms of who they work with; to be well provided; however, work-related expectation, in terms of what they receive for their work, has not met their expectations. This study finds supervisor's friendlessness, job security, and pay are top three most important.

Keywords

Job Satisfaction, Work Attributes
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abu-Bader, S. (2005). Gender, ethnicity and job satisfaction among social workers in Israel. Administration in Social Work, 29(3), 7–21.

  • Augustyn, M., & Ho, S. K. (1998). Service quality and tourism. Journal of Travel and Research, 37(1), 71-75.

  • Bai, B., Brewer, K., Sammons, G., & Swerdlow, S. (2006). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and internal service quality. Journal of Human resources in Hospitality and Tourism, 5(2), 37-54.

  • Branham, L. (2005). The 7 Hidden Reasons Employees Leave: How to Recognize the Subtle Signs and Act Before It’s Too Late, AMACOM, New York, NY.

  • Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

  • Cho, S., Johanson, M.M., & Guchait, P. (2009). Employees intent to leave: A comparison of determinants of intent to leave versus intent to stay. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(4), 374-381.

  • Choi, K. (2006). A structural relationship analysis of hotel employees’ turnover intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 11(4), 321-37.

  • Clark, A. (1996). Job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(2), 189-217.

  • Cole, D., Panchanadeswaran, S., & Daining, C. (2004). Predictors of job satisfaction of licensed social workers: Perceived efficacy as a mediator of the relationship between workload and job satisfaction. Journal of Social Service Research, 31, 1–12.

  • Decker, F.H., Harris-Kojetin, L.D., & Bercovitz, A. (2009). Intrinsic job satisfaction, overall satisfaction, and intention to leave the job among nursing assistants in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 49(5), 596-610.

  • Dienhart, J.R. & Gregoire, M.B. (1993). Job satisfaction, job involvement, job security, and customer focus of quickservice restaurant employees. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 16(29), 29-43.

  • Feather, N. T. & Rauter, K.A. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 81-94.

  • Fields D.L. (2002). Taking the Measure of Work: A Guide to Validated Scales for Organizational Research and Diagnosis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Gleason-Wynn, P. & Mindel, C. H. (1999). A proposed model for predicting job satisfaction among nursing home social workers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 32(3), 65–79.

  • Go, F. & Zhang, W. (1997). Applying importance-performance analysis to Beijing as an international meeting destination. Journal of Tourism Research, Spring, 42-49.

  • Guadagnolo, F. (1985). The important-performance analysis:An evaluation and marketing tool. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 3(2), 13-22.

  • Hartman, S.C. & Yrle, A.C. (1996). Can the hobo phenomenon help explain voluntary turnover? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 8(4), 11-16.

  • Hudson, S., Hudson, P., & Miller, G. A. (2004). The measurement of service quality in the tour operating sector: A methodological comparison. Journal of Travel Research, 42(3), 305-312.

  • Huxley, P., Evans, S., Gately, C., Webber, M., Mears, A., Pajak, S., Kendall, T., Medina, J., & Katona, C. (2005). Stress and pressures in mental health social work: The worker speaks. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 1063–1079.

  • Karl, K. & Peluchette, J. (2006). How does workplace fun impact employee perceptions of customer service quality? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(2), 2-13.

  • Kim, W.G., Leong, J.K., & Lee, Y.K. (2004). Effect of service orientation on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention of leaving in a casual dining chain restaurant. Hospitality Management, 24, 171-93.

  • Lam, T. & Zhang, H.Q. (2003). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in the Hong Kong fast food industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15 (4), 214-220.

  • Lee, E.U. & Lee, S.B. (2003). A study of the turnover intention factors on kitchen employees in the hotel industry. Journal of Tourism & Leisure Research, 15(2), 237-52.

  • Lee, C. & Moreo, P.J. (2007). What do seasonal lodging operators need to know about seasonal workers? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(1),148-160.

  • Lee, C. & Way, K. (2010). Individual employment characteristics of hotel employees that play a role in employee satisfaction and work retention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(3), 344-353.

  • Lee, Y.K., Nam, F.H., Park, D.H., & Lee, K.A. (2006). What factors influence customer-oriented prosocial behavior of customer-contact employees? Journal of Services Marketing, 20(4), 251-64.

  • Lowry, D.S., Simon, A., & Kimberley, N. (2002). Towardimproved employment relations practices of casual employees in the New South Wales registered industry. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 53-70.

  • MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Ahearne, M. (1998). Some possible antecedents and consequences of in-role and extra-role salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 87-98.

  • Martilla, J. A. & James, J.C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 70-77.

  • Martin, D. W. (1995). An importance-performance analysis of service providers. Perception of Quality Service in the Hotel Industry, 3, 5-17.

  • Matzler, K. & Sauerwein E. (2002). The factor structure of customer satisfaction: An empirical test of the importance grid and the penalty–reward–contrast analysis. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(4), 314–332.

  • O’Brien, G.E. & Dowling, P. (1980). The effects of congruency between perceived and desired job attributes upon job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(2), 121-130.

  • Oliver, R.L. (1997). Satisfaction. A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

  • Pearce, D.W. (1992), Macmillan Dictionary of Modern Economics. London, UK: The Macmillan Press.

  • Pezeshki, V., Mousavi, A., & Grant, S. (2009). Importanceperformance analysis of service attributes and its impact on decision making in the mobile telecommunication industry. Measuring Business Excellence, 13(1), 82–92.

  • Pockett, R. (2003). Staying in hospital social work. Social Work in Health Care, 36(3), 1–24.

  • Price, J. & Mueller, C.W. (1986). Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.

  • Rusbult, C., Farrell, D., Roger, G., & Mainous, A. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.

  • Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.

  • Silva, P. (2006). Effects of disposition on hospitality employee job satisfaction and commitment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(4), 317-328.

  • Sledge, S., Miles, A. K., & Coppage, S. (2008). What role does culture play? A look at motivation and job satisfaction among hotel workers in Brazil. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1667-1682.

  • Spector, P.E. (1997). Job satisfaction. London, UK: Sage Publications.

  • Spinelli, M.A. & Canavos, G.C. (2000). Investigating the relationship between employee satisfaction and guest satisfaction. Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(6), 29-33.

  • Szivas, E., Riley, M., & Airey, D. (2003). Labor mobility into tourism: Attraction and satisfaction. Annals of Tourism research, 30(1), 64-76.

  • Wade, D. J. & Eagles, P. F. J. (2003). The use of importanceperformance analysis and market segmentation for tourism management in parks and protected areas: An application to Tanzania’s national parks. Journal of Ecotourism, 2(3), 196-212.

  • Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V., England, G.W., & Loftquist, L.H. (1967). Manual of the Minnesota satis.


Abstract Views: 575

PDF Views: 8




  • Gap Analysis: Comparison of Job-related Attributes between Importance and Satisfaction.

Abstract Views: 575  |  PDF Views: 8

Authors

Chang Lee
Department of Recreation, Hospitality and Parks Management, College of Communication and Education, California State University, Chico, Yolo Hall 192, Box 0560, Chico, CA 95929-0560.

Abstract


Employees have their own perceptions or attitudes about many aspects of work itself, and their own satisfaction with job or non-work-related attributes. Job satisfaction has been widely studied by many researchers and practitioners. This study surveys selected work-related attributes to help hoteliers improve work environments. This study initially identifies the level of importance on work-related attributes and the level of satisfaction with those attributes among hotel workers. Whether differences exist between the levels of importance of work-related attributes and satisfaction with those attributes is also explored. The purpose of this study is to identify how hotel workers perceive their work environments and identify areas that need more attention from hotel managers. Based on the purpose of this study, work-related attributes are measured according to the level of importance and the level of satisfaction. The study indicates that hotel workers consider their work environments, in terms of who they work with; to be well provided; however, work-related expectation, in terms of what they receive for their work, has not met their expectations. This study finds supervisor's friendlessness, job security, and pay are top three most important.

Keywords


Job Satisfaction, Work Attributes

References