![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
Impact of Intervention in Remediating Visual Perception Skills of Urban School Children with Poor Handwriting
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The present study is an attempt to evaluate the impact of intervention programme in remediating visual perception skills of urban school children with poor handwriting. The total sample consisted of 60 children of grade 3 from the public schools of Ludhiana city with average or above average intellectual abilities. Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (Raven, 1965) was used to assess the intellectual abilities of the children. Occupational Therapy Screening Test (Lilley, 2006) Set A and Set B were used to assess handwriting and different sub-skills of visual perception respectively. An individualized need-based remedial intervention programme based on multisensory, visuo-motor integration and cognitive approaches was developed to improve handwriting legibility of children. Efficacy of the developed programme was assessed by comparing pre and post-intervention scores of the children. Pre-intervention scores revealed that more than half of the children with poor handwriting skills were found to have poor visual perception followed by average and good level. However, after intervention, significant improvement was found in this skill. The results also revealed that before intervention, out of all the sub-skills of visual perception 'Visual Motor Integration' followed by 'Visual Discrimination' were found to be the poorest among such children. However, after receiving intervention, these sub-skills became the strongest skills of such children. It was further found that significant improvement in the mean scores of children was observed during post-intervention assessment across all the levels and sub-skills of visual perception.
Keywords
Visual Perception, Visual Discrimination, Visual Motor Integration, Intervention.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Asher, A. V (2006). Handwriting instruction in elementary schools. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 461-471.
- Case-Smith, J. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy intervention on handwriting. American Journal of'Occupational Therapy, 56,17-25.
- Cornhill, H., & Case-Smith, J. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 732-739.
- Daly, C. J., Kelley, G. T., & Krauss, A. (2003). Relationship between visual-motor integration and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten: A modified replication study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57,459-462.
- Desai, A. S., & Rege, R V. (2005). Correlation between developmental test of visual motor integration and handwriting in cerebral palsy children. Indian Journal Occupational Therapy, 37, 22-26.
- Donica, D. (2010). A historical journey through the development of handwriting instruction: The occupational therapists' role. Journal of Occupational Therapy Schools Early Intervention, 3, 32-53.
- Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. EducationalPsychology Review, 8, 77-87.
- Karlsdottir, R, & Stefansson, T. (2002). Problems in developing functional handwriting. Perceptual Motor Skills, 94,623-662.
- Lilley, R (2006). Occupational therapy screening test. 27 Barker Rise, Browns Bay. Auckland, New Zealand.
- Pagliarini, E., Guasti, M. T., Toneatto, C, Riva, R, Sarti, D., & Stucchi, N. (2015). Dyslexic children fail to comply with the rhythmic constraints of handwriting. Human Movement Science, 42,161-182.
- Raven, J. C. (1965). Coloured Progressive Matrices. HK Lewis publishing Co, London.
- Sovik, N. (1975). The effects of different principles of instruction in children's copying performance. JournalojExperienced ChildPsychology, 45, 38-45.
- Sudsawad, P., Trombly, C.A., Henderson, A., & Tickle, D.L. (2001). The relationship between the evaluation tool of children's handwriting and teachers perception of handwriting legibility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55,518-523.
- Tseng, M. H., & Cermak, S. (1993). The influence ofergonomic factors and perceptual motor abilities on handwriting performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47,919-926.
- Weintraub, N., & Graham, S. (2000). The contribution of gender, orthographic, finger function and visual-motor processes to the prediction of handwriting status. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 121-140.
- Zwicker, J. G., & Hadwin, A. R (2009). Cognitive versus multi sensory approaches to handwriting intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Occupational Therapy Journal ofResearch, 29,40-48.
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 414
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 1